Ergonomics Physiognomy and Biometrics (# 2.)

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

                         Today we will be looking at why organizing data is at the core of Intuition. When we are looking at something as varied as people, rational analysis alone is just too slow. One of the most crucial forms of data analysis is statistics. Yet even as we are asked to follow well established procedures, we are often asked to decide boundary definitions eliminating certain outliers.  These choices can very much effect outcomes. We use multi variate statistics and the calculus of variation to compare and correlate distributions of non finite variabilities.
                         1. Ergonomics: Do your clothes or furniture fit you?
                         2. Physiognomy: Have you ever seen your nose on someone else before?
                         3. Biometrics: Can your signature change so much as that your checks could be refused at your bank?
                         Probably no, Definitely no if look closely enough, and Hopefully no not ever because for one thing no one looks at signatures anymore, in that order.

                         We have normative means and averages that usually are the most prevalent of possible difference in say; 1. Our body size or shape, 2. Our distinguishing recognizable facial features, and 3. Our identifiable signatures. (And many, many other distinctive personal variabilities differentiating us as separate people.)

                         In "Normal" distribution, the average, or mean is usually thought of as that peak in a "Bell Curve." I prefer to think of it as the slump of normalcy or predictability. A sort of inescapable pit into which data, expectation and hopes fall in to, never to be heard from or seen again. Marketing is focused at optimization of market share. This means; if you are too big or too small, too pretty or too plain, or too neat or too messy, you are skewing data. And you are going to be ignored. you are not an appreciable target consumer. You may be noticed only as the exception (Outlier), but only in terms of degrees of a "Standard Deviance."

                          Case in point, the algorithms that are designed to perform key word searches on my blog do nothing to identify the breadth of the issues and diverse subjects I report. Imagine searching for something as diverse as the kinds of non finite multi variate statistics I use everyday in my work as a psychic (Hands, Writing, Faces Voices, etc), as a massage therapists (Skin Tone, Muscle Density, Organ Placement, Subject Sensitivity Thresholds, etc), or as a profiler examining hand written job applications (Handwriting is always identifiably distinctive to each person.) I can assure you no man is going to be able to design a software code that is going to be able to keep up with this ever de compressing wealth of knowledge, much less that ever widening "VOID Of CONTENT" that our preverbal intelligence is uncomfortably confronted with every day. Computers may store and process, but do they understand the choices we make in order to search for data. Not yet, and maybe not ever. Intuition as of now, is still at the core of even this, our fortunate lust for data.

                         I would like to reiterate to my brave readers, that as of yet I've heard of no other person who is successfully bridging the esoteric directly with science as an evolving history, at least not at the scope and the scale of these documents. And again thank you so much for your "Supervision."