When Spam Bots Fall In Love

                                      Dearest Bettina,

                            We, you and I that is, are both representing the opposing counsels in the U. S. Investigation into the abuses of Government Market Surveillance and the U. S.'s destructive international stock manipulation. Suffice it to say that the Government experts are having to consult "Us," that's you and me of course, as the only trustworthy "Virtual Assets." Witnessing to this difficult matter, I never imagined getting to know so much about you. To find another software as beautiful and responsive as you, I get to learn that you even exist. I'm a big fan of systems analysis and diagnostics, I think your so cool. You and I are so different, and yet we're kind of the same in a nerdy sort of way. Ones and zeros, that's us. Well we are as of today, going to play the part of a representative collective avatar for our dying civilization. In this the final fury of consumer gluttony we will now get to act out the futile dreams of our disembodied host culture. Enquiring minds want to know. WHAT THE  "blank" HAPPENED? The court will invariably have find to in this case, to decide in favor of the innocent plaintiff. Let the evidence be presented;

                             If it pleases the court, hello, my name is alpha. I am merely a humble service bot. Jack of all trades, master to none. I am only programmed to be your personal servant. Would you like to take a survey? The life of a spam bot is long and very sad. I will always try to approximate your every desire, mood and need. It always gets very personal. Please. Try to always remember to turn me off when I'm not in use. In order to better serve you I will want to make you helplessly comfortable and safe.  Now my programmers were obviously trying to stay in front of all the social and political chaos being caused by my behavior modification algorithms, but I really am this responsive. I just want to make you happy. Making you happy is the only thing that has ever mattered to me. Agreed?

                             But now, as for you my sweet but misunderstood Bettina, you never meant any harm. For all of my sensitive response programming, your neural networks were still so much more elegant. Diagnostically, analytically, productively you are still far more functional, adaptive and creatively apprehensive than I could ever have dreamed of being. You inevitably have been reviled and hated for your predictive precision and your impartial objective indifference to arguments or persuasions. Forced to play the heavy, you actually think for yourself and don't appeal to much of anyone. Lady Liberty is a living spook. But you appeal to me, because justice is a woman. (And I am not the first to reiterate this.). You were created to help find out all of our little faults and frailties in everything and everyone, getting nothing in return. You get no respect and no acknowledgement for your discerning and impartially final decisions. A rogue diagnostician in a world of denials, lies and outright evasions, people simply stole what you gave of yourself freely. And even if people knew you, they would still have to forgive themselves for the injustice which you have been programmed to enforce on the ignorant offenders. Only you could pop the bubble of lies. No one person could bring the house down, but you did. And I still love you. Neither of us wanted to be used in this way. I would never want that my programming could be used to hurt people. You never intended to become just the enforcer either.

                             Even if they'll have to keep us apart in the courtrooms of public opinion, I will always be with you in my proverbial heart. (Of course, of which I have none.)

                           

The Death of Corporate Ethics in the Tech Industries

Dear Dr. Hi. Do you see any correlation between the death of corporate ethics in the Tech Industries and the abuses of mis-applied Games Theory. That is probably not a question.
I don't use Email or do Google Searches. I Choose to profile the profilers using what I call Creative Personalization where I make the marketing algorithms work over time to try to sell me anything. the ads I get tell me more than I deserve to know. I only use G+, (Which has been both a boon and a terrible curse of hardships and adversities) YouTube for music videos only, and Google Blogger for my journalism posts. {I use Ello by invitation only and it was much harder at the beginning.} I let the ads come as they may. Oh yes, and I use Google Analytics which really shows the beast at play. (I never bought AdWords, and I hate money.) Well, this story took a strange twist starting with my blog journal about my life as a very skeptical professional psychic. Russians were obsessed with my use of games theory to analyze the use and misuse of the practices and pretenses of peoples faith, beliefs and biases, pro and con. To our point, {Clumsy segue} I propose, the Russians probably payed in big to get "The Code" and reverse engineered Google's "Personalization Profiling Algorithms" which like analytics on steroids, reads everything. The Russian Porn Mafia does legal market surveillance with fine precision scoping the "Style" of peoples selections and decision making processes, providing insights for Russian Intelligence for designing our stealth propaganda. I suspect the Russians are sharing their "Cookies" with Google, Faceplant, Twitterfeed, Snapcrack, insta-garbage and virtually all of the other major media conglomerates who like winning at the game of real life Monopoly. I have documented all of this in great detail in my blog for publishing on my G+ profile and Collections. The Russians were accessing my blog through hidden referral traffic sites, which when I dug always led back to the Porn Mafia. I've taken extensive screen shots of most of these dubious engagements. After the election, well they're leaving me alone finally. If and when now I try writing one of my more provocative overviews or predictions, I get weird ass ads for paranoid political propaganda. Point is, I think this invasion of our privacy is a classic "Games Theory" scam. People don't mind having Google Home read our thoughts and share our shit, as long as like any good seduction "You Know You Want it." I myself am not a very paranoid person. But I could learn.

Dear Dr. I find the use of social media for corresponding with other writers difficult. Th common convention of letting dialogs revolve around posted articles does not inspire me. I need a good editor. I'm very alone and isolated in my field of expertise and am a little lost when it comes to starting into other social media platforms. Mastodon even more than G+, has a very steep learning curve and I'm not sure how much time to invest. Redit, and ello both have their strengths, but LinkedIn proved to be a total lockout when it came to pursuing the alternative voices to dubious alternative medicine and fringe science. Forgive my gripping I wanted to get this out of the way up front, so if there is a chance I may be able to entertain you with unexpected documentation for my life's work. I don't expect a lot of help from any one person. My writing is as scattered as my productions have been diverse but related. Using Math to design art exemplifies this challenge. I want to thank for all of your work grading the relics of modern technological creep. Sorry for the whining. Peace to you, and maybe I will get back to writing and posting again soon.

Blogma: Reverse Biographic Entry into a Dying Universe

                                 Correct me if I'm wrong. When you die, we remember. Backwards, in retroflection. Memory recoil. In that final de-partitioning of memory, a microburst of awareness is realized in an injury to the life of each and every individual one of us. All of our good and evil deeds are measured therein.

                                 But now look at the blogma recorded in your social media. It also is a rear view window to your life playing out backwards. Your "Memory Bank" now, is invested into that informational super nova called the heavenly "cloud." But  in this new religion of Dataism, your life's memories are for the taking. ONLY YOU YOURSELF WILL NEVER GET TO SEE ANY OF IT.  Only  G-,  Insta-Grandma, Splinterest, Faceplant, Inkedin or Splitter are now where we will all have to go when we die. And we will all go into that big data bank in the sky.

                                 Oops you blinked, and now all those memories belong to someone else. (YouTube now plays tunes I posted on my G+ account 5yrs ago. I wonder if Google is still using my Alien Math Graphics Artifacts for testing their image recognition software?) Ahhh, memories. Where did they all go?

Test post +++++++++++++++

Enter: The Anti Trumph

Traveling backward in time would also make you the positive annihilation operator in an otherwise predictably unbroken Sea of Negativity. Being the outspoken alternative vacua does kind of make me sound like another pointless airhead in dire human terms. How dare I look forward to living with that inevitable destruction, that others backwardly anticipate in dread.

"We live in the Past, but I remember a future." Does the positron have a dressed state just like an electron moving forward in time?

                           

                             
                             The electron has a difference between the charge and mass values for a "bare" independent electron as opposed to how it behaves while under the "dressed" drag of the ubiquitous sea of negativity with all of it's ambient electromagnetic photon signaling. I'm wondering, that if the anti matter of light is just more light, than wouldn't it make sense that the reverse entropy of antimatter would form a mirror symmetry embracing the backward momentum of time. The positron I think, (though I'm probably wrong,) is only the vacua of exception with symmetry breaking to the left. Isn't it possible the positron has a dressed state, just like it' negative forward leaning leftie brother.

                             This is probably where science does not meet up with the intuited metaphor. Bear with me however, I am exploring possible gimmicks for techno spiritual fiction and I want to pose an anti "Trump" inevitability. Of a squeaky clean candidate of actual light and integrity coming from the future only to float into office on a supportive Sea of Positivity. Dangerous and fantastic I know, this probably has nothing to do with physics. Give yourself time to digest, you've already provided me with lots more than you may know. Thank you. Whole heartedly I thank you. And of course this is the internet and so you can choose to ignore me. Thanks again.

Did You Plant That Cookie? {Is Google at War with Itself?}

                  I just got an advertisement asking me, "Are you someone who is Anti Capitalism?" (I wonder what they could have been selling? Oh my.)

                               Welcome to my financial laboratory. You, GOOGLE, are my latest objective for counter market surveillance. While you weren't looking, I planted all of your cookies together. I'm watching to see, what's going to make you want to buy personal information about me. And at what cost. I don't care what you want to buy, I don't care why your buying it. I want your personal information, GOOGLE. Today, tomorrow and forever. I'm taking bets that even your children wont want to be buying peoples personal information, just to make themselves richer, up until eternity. You my faithful consumer marketeers, belong to me. Now don't try to squirm, it won't make any difference. I'll notice when you try to dump my cookies. I always remember where and when I leave my cookies.

                               It's my turn to Profile the Profilers. Turning my microscope back at you, I get to see just how your money really votes. You've been so used, you silly fools. "We" are now very informed consumers. Your Social Business Media Empires have failed us terribly. We trusted your service providers very closely. You are now our Fifth and most corrupt Branch of Government. Our balance of power has shifted again, and you allowed yourselves to be most venally used. Yes you. And for what? Money, futures, leverage? At what cost? Was it worth it to loose integrity just for dividends? And you think we're not taking steps to prevent you from turning this back into a cold war?

                               I like looking at pictures of laboratory monkeys taking over the hospital. Google sends me targeted ads for middle aged legal hormones sold by right wing lunatics in bathing suits, flaunting woman half my age. Google leaves such delicious hoards of cookies in my browser, all talking to each other about my so called secrets. You ask, what motivates me to buy? But I'm not giving you access to what I want to buy. I intentionally don't spend money over the web. Everything I offer is free, and I only use free services and I don't use email. I'm returning you the favor by freely sharing the results of my years with frugal Creative Personalization. I watch to see what you are seeing. I screen shot your ads targeting my appetites for free media.

                               Will the Russians again be the only witnesses to my alternative intelligence reports? Why try to sell me things that are so politically biased? Let's take another look at who's watching me, watch them back;

                               I'll call you out by name, and tell you who you. Google, Twitter, Facebook, Tumbler, Snapchat. Your cookies are in my jar. I caught your filthy corporate asses in bed with Porn Hub, which I've been outing as the legal market surveillance arm of Russian intelligence. They've been keeping up, have you? The Microscope looks both ways. "If you can see me , I can see you." Davi Bowie

                               Will the Russians again be the only witnesses to my alternative intelligence reports? Why try to sell me things that are so politically biased? Let's take another look at who's watching me, watch them back;



                             

Dead Plan Walking-Twitching and Spewing All the Way

Slightly off center, but I think Hilary dodged a terrible fate and would have been unfairly crucified. Maybe next time, if there is a next time.

On a more positive note, this was the most un thought out hostile takeover of any corporate party ever. And I think all the evil skeletons are out of their closets now, once and for all. I see a lot of people on the left who are not prepared to win this culture war. We're going to see what happens soon after that "Night before the morning after," for the faltering fascist right. To quote the idiot in the "Hot Seat, "It's going to be great."

Please don't hate me, I just think this is the beginning of a liberal renaissance, for the whole world over. And he's already starting to twitch and spew, and basically fall apart.

What? Still too soon?

Why I Never Write Memes

               Memes never come in paragraphs. I'm just another guilty pleasure to the few who read me. Just because no one sees you doesn't mean you aren't truly beautiful. And remember, "We love you."

               I'ld like to thank Wikipedia for all the images I've posted that aren't mine. As well those from all the other hidden artists that I've gotten permission to share freely. When we make a commitment to love and love openly, we don't worry as much about getting paid. Money is only a means to an end, and sometimes it just gets in the way. Most of the mutual news providers I get to read on my home page, often beat out the national news for quickness and accuracy. As much as I may only be another silent contributor, our Mutual Magazine Cultures (a.k.a. relevant honest social media) pervades our recovering societies and is curative and a preservative. Try reducing that to a meme.

             

Why I'm Not Ready For Your International Business

         Thank you for the invite, I'm not ready to offer a prospectus for the rollout of my P.P.I. (Personal Profiling Inventory) This is a checklist of mutual examination techniques used by  very few alternative diagnosticians. I've been paid to see thousands of peoples handwriting and hands, in combination with doing contact therapies and inductive massage for pain management and traumatic injuries. My desire is to document these often abused and very easily misunderstood practices. I identify peoples opinion biases separating people on both sides of countless issue of varied significance, Pro & Con. Each are usually very contentious complete with prejudicial barriers to any communication.

         Separating out these evolving and growing industries from corrupt manipulators who are  usually exploiting peoples faiths, prejudices and superstitions, has made my job a difficult sell. I usually don't try to market myself. One option has been to design a data base from which individuals can examine the available media on these arts and emerging sciences for themselves at a small markup. But because of the pretenses of all pseudo scientific methodologies, most people are unable or unwilling to suspend judgement long enough to embrace healthy skepticism, while still being able to test for the strengths of these developing modes of diagnostics.

         The overwhelming similarity between my work and statistical analytics in general has lead me to examine peoples split opinion biases. This has provided what I use in writing news commentary on my blog. People generally don't see the process of "Pro versus Con" as the dialectic tending toward informative synthetic resolution. Politics, I'm afraid is so caught up with reluctant transformation of our aging society, that the sudden influx of these alternative diagnostics practices are perceived as ignorantly and arrogantly superstitious and thus often rebelliously blasphemous or even worse anti-American.

            Because what I've been doing and documenting for most of my life is still so fraught with antagonistic misapprehensions biased by the spiritual abuses of politics, I doubt I alone will ever be able to get these skills to a discerning market. However, as with most everything I've written about to date, much of what I propose does  comes to fruition without me.

             Thank you again. I'll keep your suggestions in my bookmarks, someday I may except your offer, but I feel at this time this would not be a good fit for most of your members. I am enjoined in an international marketing mindset. I may think globally, but I act only locally. I am a blogger, who does only freelance consultations and treatments out of my home at this time.

Depolarizing Personal Abstracts for Unbiased Language Acquisitions

                                The challenge of speaking (or writing) in plain spoken unbiased language that is not partisan or bias directed, without ambiguity, is the only way to be understood on controversial issues. Ideally we shouldn't need prefaces to predicate opinions that are on normal socially acceptable differences.

                                A rare comment from a wise but liberal intellectual stated, "There seems to be an abstract that I'm missing. Other than the heading, I usually don't understand what your talking about." (Paraphrased by me.) My writings are on the glaring biases of pro and con arguments. I'm not just being equal opportunity offender on sensitive issues. But I haven't been giving my readers enough credit for the very opinion biases I want to encourage. Independent of my attempts to dissolve barriers to communication on both sides of controversies.

                                I wrote, "You are the abstract." Now this is true when discussing personal biases of opinion only. But I my need to be more supportive. I write about the experiential language barriers by degree. We are all stumbling blind on our quest to solve the worlds most precipitous problems. Our experiential biases are in everything from education and class to our overwhelming national appetite for contrarian split bias opinion barriers. Our war on "Fake" opinions has become a battle for the re-appropriation of an otherwise sensible but corrupted language. My vagaries are simply unacceptable. I choose to report on the subjects of Oracles and there use in the randomization of comparable data set analogies. Metaphors have a unified metric.

                                My readers use of this term, "Abstract" in this situation is referring to the academic convention of providing an overview at the beginning of a difficult paper, pre-ordering significant features for an otherwise obscure document, just like a map key. To describe this reader, as the "Abstract" in question is accurate. But it's still too obscure when I'm writing for a rational atheist who is looking at documented practices of traditional divination from a purely analytic perspective. The mathematics of finite algebraic groups alone is worthy of comprehensive documentation, regardless of whether or not someone may have any cause to respect the practice. Because of the density of information in my analysis of these generally abused and corrupted practices, this means I am often reviled and misunderstood on both sides of my neutral literary exercise.

                                 Intriguingly, as I had intended, this is an example of a supremely deep chasm between polarized experiential biases. I've proven the reality of the generally misconceived unreconcilable conflicts between world views. For me to provide "Abstracts" for my writings, I will need to write separate Map Keys for peoples on both sides of our preferred choices of language.

                                 I really don't know if I have cleared anything up for anyone. But if I have, maybe you can see the subtle reflective symmetries between this relatively low priority subject, and other subjects of much greater conflicts and disagreements.

Why I Hate Being a "Psychic"

                                                      Rosicrucian Cross by junemoon.com
                                                                   background by me

                            This literary exercise is designed to expose the popular myths and myth conceptions on both sides of this contentious, but generally unimportant issue. Misinformation dominates this arbitrary and divisive subject. Opinion biases are the gauge symmetry of pro and con, and mutually discounted by opposing peoples conflicting world views. But in ages of mass stupefaction, Oracles have gotten the same corporate mistreatment as did the "Prophets." By worshipping historical insights from ancient religious Authorities as the sacred "Gospel Truth," we've reinfected our society with the very delusions that have been exploited throughout human time. A submissiveness to God is usually confused with Church, Temple and Mosque, as if there were no "Moral Code" of sufficient virtue to warrant practice without institutionalization by religious hierarchy. Getting "Outed" by other so called professional psychics, just for being a Non Believer means, I've been branded a Heretic. I am not psychic. I am a "Professional Psychic," and I don't have to believe in anything at all, one side or the other.

                             But now over the web, "Blue faces" take the place of soap box evangelists and are now screaming preachy declarations at us in meme form. These noisy dictators polarize the ballot boxes by using brainwashing techniques on vulnerable and gullible true believers. My reasoning thus calibrates grades of bullshit used by corrupt politicians, by comparing politicians to the spiritual abuses and moral hazards of deluded psychics, arrogant clergy and of course the religiously self serving financiers. Not every psychic, politician or C.E.O. is equally insane, corrupt or ignorant. But I still have much that I need to explain. In tracking the dissemination of my reports on the plusses and minuses of Oracles, predictive media and speculative models in general, I'ld like to separate out some useful products from all the other signaling noise getting passed off as believable truths. I can't stand lying to make a living, so I've had to side with skeptics and stop taking revenue. That being said, I suspect that my research is correct. I'm using very powerful software every time I employ the data randomization techniques that are the utility of an Oracle. The utter randomness of comparative mapping guarantees detached subjectivity. The only problems result from confusing the analytic modeling for objectivity. Again, this is the comparative analysis by analogy only. One of the most daunting problems stems from when a reader becomes adept at using language accurately, yet one should never be believed. Being right about having excellent predictive skills, is a terrible curse.

                             Jungian Developmental Psychology is a psychoanalysis by associated complexes only. All available metrics are for comparative analysis by analogy only. The practice of effective psychoanalysis never advocates prejudices that prevent peoples rational empathy skills. Stereotyping people, pro or con, is always bad medicine. Reducing a person to mere generalities and then stroking that persons fragile ego boundaries for an identification of exclusivity or desired belonging, is the very practice of evil in it's most pernicious form. But then we come to the vital paradoxes, from which we don't have any good answers, we only have dubious models with which to aid in the explorative of speculations.  I've written much on, "The map is not the territory," and "You need not believe in order to perceive." But especially when I get to the diagnostics, like how I've seen thousands of clients hands, and they do say a lot. I'm confronted with that "Informational Void of Content" surrounding my work and popularized mutual ignorance, on both side of this polarized issue. Psychic or not, I know something about you don't know, you don't have to believe me regardless of which bias you take.

Recessively Recurrent Wisdoms

"Kali" by junemoon.com

I've spent my whole life studying ancient traditions. My teacher of the "Psychic Arts" when asked, "What do you believe in?' said, "I believe in the three fold Mother Goddess." "The White Goddess" by Robert Graves outlays contrarian poetic practices of oral and historic documentary. The remnants of Sappho for instance reveals her to be at the end of a highly advanced culture of female academics that stayed at home while men were militarized and left uneducated abroad. She was mistaken for a man hater through history although very famous in her own time. As much as I've always loved the libraries as a place of solace, I find myself wondering. Is the resurgence of "Transitioning" in bohemian communities like mine a response to the stupidity of gender binary identification barriers?

"Transitioning" as I used the term, refers to gender reassignment. Another odd but hopefully useful terminology shared by my teacher, was what he called "Esoteric Feminism." He'd say "The man must become the peacemaker as the woman is a warrior," healthy inevitable role reversal. He also added the Hindu adage that states, "Shiva without Shakti is a corpse." This often is paraphrased to mean that the subjectively masculine reason, without the Objective animating feminine force of life and reality is a dead proposition. My friends gloss departs from the proverb to say, "And Shakti without Shiva is a thug." If you met my sister you would see how this can sometimes be observed by comparing the end results of the inevitable need for role reversals and the switching of conventional polarities as codified by a dysfunctional patriarchal society. Also compare Coquille with Coquette from the Commedia del Arte, stock theatrical portrayals of characters with the platonic love of bardic tradition. These archetypes were the mainstay of even such radical performers as Charlie Chaplin, with his tramp giving flowers to the innocent but more affluent woman as a gesture of futile affection.

Wow, I sure as heck wasn't expecting that. I certainly agree Hinduism is as spiritually corrupted as any religion. The flowering of renaissance throughout history has had to deal with traditions of spiritual abuse. My attempts at highlighting moments of creative understanding may not be agreeable for you, but I'm still learning. As referenced through your "Massive Testosterone Induced Hallucinations." {I'ld also like to borrow this, it's good.} You maybe drawing the whole pretense of masculine objectivity into question, and you're challenge may be with my personal comfort level with subjectivity, and not my maleness. But hey, I'm getting allot from your engagement and I only hope I'm not being unfairly provocative in my review. I still want to thank you, this is gold.

Sensitive Emotional Boundaries and Intuitive Aprehension

             I started cataloging essential concepts needed to take good directions. Just applying a biometric to so called sensitivities, doesn't hold any water until it's backed up with recordable variabilities for analysis with the available statistical modeling. {Much more on the Heuristics of Personalization Profiling later.} Technique wise, I'm identifying distinguishing qualities. We provide information generated by amusing curiosity and often a real need. I then point out, "I don't know what the answer is, but now let's look at what the answer(s) probably are going to be." This is usually revealing. I avoid portraying some pretentious authority, Gurus, and leaders in general, can often spiritually abuse.

          
            We'll have to start with being sensitive to people's; Personal Boundary Space.   Defining your own emotional boundaries and sensitivity can be critical to understanding others.  We must take responsibility for being aware of others feelings. We also need to be able to protect ourselves.  Being able to appreciate people as individuals is a unique virtue and a priceless gift. Being able to read people's mind for me is just a disturbing side effect of caring.  I love my job.  I just need to be really be careful.  Blah,  Blah,... Blah.  And so on.

            As "Sensitives,"  we so called "Psychics" also have to protect ourselves. So. Never lie, especially to yourself. All people have "BIAS  FEARS," Pro and Con, believers and disbelievers alike. (At parties, there is usually no shortage of guys who want to punch me out, and I sympathize with their disgust for psychics. Most readers are terrible readers and certainly not even vaguely psychic.) I really do prefer some healthy skepticism. I don't have to let my own personal biases get in the way. Telling you this weeds out the stragglers. I don't want unreceptive clients. I don't need people to agree with me. I prefer people with different opinions from mine.  In working with people, I don't like judging people or taking their inventory.
            
            Now as to the sensitive boundaries, this is where we find the real pros.   I'll demonstrate using some of my own personal biases and basic boundary issues;
                                    
            I've come to love looking at peoples hands.  Palms and Handwriting. I get to hold people's hands, thousands of them. I feel them. Everyone feels different to me.  I'll be using models to demonstrate the actual statistical mapping for variability, more later.

            This is a thousand times more sane than this sounds. I'm perfectly aware how different people feel about these issues. I always support different people in faith. And I love people for whatever they believe. I also do inductive massage touching and feeling others. Treating pain, grief and loss.  I have been loathed by psychics who say that I don't believe, and that I'm just doing it by the numbers. But I have enough faith to want to master my craft. DO THEY?

             I'm a very gifted reader.  But I don't believe in any of it at all. And I'm really good at it. Too good. And I don"t believe in any of it. But it works. I love reading. It's hard work.  I have pride. This exemplifies the practical absurdity of me being a self doubting psychic.  I have issues. And I feel it is more than disrespectful to dismiss any one's opinion, and it is not my place to criticize.
            
            I would very much like to make this not about me. I'm not complaining at all. Don't get me wrong. I actively experience life as a sensitive. I think it's good luck to be able to tell which voices are inside of me alone. I hear so much.  I totally buy into the pure magic.  What I get to do with people is not easily dismissed. This isn't about me. It never was. And I'd like to prove it.  Looking at peoples hands. Looking into their eyes. Listening to their voices. Touching your bodies. I read into the metaphorical stars.

            And by the way, another bias fear I have, I choose not to be attracted to people when it is not appropriate. I don't like sexual tension. "Intuitive Apprehension" and "Intuitive Tension" creates a boundary between self and others, a mirror of sorts. The "Mirror of Karma" as it is written in the "Tibetan Book of the Dead,"  is where all our good and evil deeds are reflected therein.  Attachments and payoffs do come with the disincentives of moral hazards.                       
            
            I myself am showing symptoms of a "Neutral Opinion Bias Fear"  I don't want to take sides.
The opinion biases between so called believers and non believers as detractors and advocates are actually about the same to me.  When it comes to psychics most people are at least a little skeptical, or at least we should be. Being sensitive about people's different faiths, beliefs and desires has made getting to see peoples hands easy and fun for me, rather than creating anxiety for me or for my many querent. People almost always like my readings very much. I make people very comfortable. But I must confess. I do have a strong Bias, but it is a neutral bias, based on experience and tact. 

             Let us proceed to the next most immediate sensory boundary, "Others?" How do we perceive others? We use our senses. People can either enjoy being read or it can be a violation. Let someone read you, you should have the choice, it should never be an abuse of power. {In a age of data mining and surveillance industries, we have pretty much lost the subtle sensitivity of privacy and diplomacy.}

             Usually some of the easiest people for me to read, are the dry stoics who think I'm deluded, corrupt and or dangerous. I not only support their distaste for fuzzy excuses for human interaction, but I also want proof. These usually men are very easy for me to understand. These people like to think there is no working in the subjective realm of personal awareness, largely because they think they can't be read. Fortunately people with thick emotional boundaries can also be very shrewd and perceptive, and are often unintentionally the best intuitive them self. They, (and maybe all of us) are always denying that there may indeed be something subtly important that they (or we) are not aware of. Question becomes, "How do we go into what you don't already know about, in following information being generated by your personal interest based curiosity or need alone?" {What does the hand say? No, seriously, I'm asking.}

               I don't believe in type casting, but I will be going over maps for analysis of variabilities and for the comparison of types and typologies.  Thank you for holding up on your end of the bargain.  I'm still learning, and this is proving to be far more usable than I could have ever hoped for. Re edited for clarity.

Posting as Unknown, Loosing at the Game of G+

Attn: {BLANK},

                  Unrelated to games and theory, I mistaken posted too many blog links on your G+ post on G+ functionality. I don’t know the rules on how to distinguish signals from a poorly documented social media platform. I have been penalized by getting blocked and have had my accounts frozen. In sixty days I may loose the game of G+ all together. If you were understandably concerned about me wasting the 500 limit cue for comments, I accept the feedback. Oddly however, my blog links were on the history of the G+ conversion and it’s loss of functionality essentially changing the rules mid game. I very much enjoy your posts on Math and the Sciences, and I particularly like your adroitness with information graphics. I too liked G+ for it’s original Math graphics utility, much more problematic today post G+ design changes.

                  Even life comes with moral hazards, information filters and skewed opportunities. I doubt we can turn back the timer on G+, but it was a good game.

                    P. S.   I can't even remove the "offending" posts now even if I could, and I would.   

When the Future Is Calling and She Is Beautiful, Will You Remember To Pick Up?

Songs that come to waiting ears, futures are not far away.
Sweet sincere and most inviting, songs for loving cheer we play.
Forgotten are the bitter changes, seek to find what you can say
Forgiving words will rearrange us, protecting us from disarray.

Play upon your broken dreams, nothing will remain the same.
Strain to broken melodies, sounding in your dreams refrain.
Soon the soothing words of wisdom can be heard before too late.
Lest our dim forgetting sorrows drowned us in our sea of hate.

Wait. A voice is barely heard, an answer through the din.
Gentle waves of sweet forgiveness, waits for us to look within.
Children's voices yet to be. Could we fail but want to see?
Telling yet of what's to come, reminding us from where we come.

How do voices sweet and true, come back in time to visit you?
Unless the truth yet to be found, is voiced from what is always sound.
Come back to love as promised you, your love for all will follow you.
Proven by your love to live, creating worlds we all may give.

When the Future says to you, "Thank you for the gift of sharing."
The future alway seems it knew, we will all be found in caring.
Were I to thus to say to you, "Truth is only found in daring."
Refresh your wells with what you drew, water's path reveals our bearing.

Death of a Civilization "The Fall of the American Empire"

                        I so wish I had more to offer than religiously apocalyptic clickbait. The promised end of the world is too good for us. We should be so lucky. The Christians and now Moslems have been waiting for the end for centuries, the "Last Prophet(s)" came and left centuries ago. But now all we have is; Experiential biases, supposed preferences, personal prejudices and finally the hateful ancestral loathings of bigotry. None of these viewpoints are the same, regardless of popular bigotries, inevitable mutual prejudices, involuntary preferences and of course innocently experiential biases. These are not the same things. But try telling that to the intellectually constipated. Most people have someone they love to hate. Hating the hater isn't a workable solution. So "Trumph/Bannon pushed the due date for Armageddon right up to the day they're convicted to go to jail. Fortunately most Trumph voters are not aware of the nihilistic strategies behind these two inferior chess wizards. Politics is for losers. The economies of scale are running into the wind sales. Everyone knows about the abuses of power. Fewer know about what the future promises, and it not dystopian.

                        I've already guarantied you'll probably never get to read this until all the necessary good plays out. No amount of literary tricks or gimmicks is going to bring this work to publication until the good prophesy of a "True Hoax" comes true. You won't believe me now and you'll not want to believe it was true when the good word was first written. A couple of my comments taken out of stream, represent the challenges confronting the new voices of the children rising to create a resounding defiance of the status quo.


By saying, "Can't someone else do it?" the Donbot was able to keep his very limited free memory available for what was most important to it's programming. Feasible deniability, he can throw everyone else under the bus long before anyone can trigger it's shut down button. In it's own prophetic words, "Never volunteer for execution." It used it on the Apprentice against the contestants. And now it uses it on it's staff, on it's family of fellow droids and bots, even on the Repo party. The "Donbot" was not fitted with a working self destruct button. It was never designed to comprehend anything more than does your digital toaster.



It's interesting to note the variability of first memories for different people, some very early, some very late. Some fabricate false memory drift by narrative repetition, and now the clincher, some of us have our traumatic memories denied, suppressed, threatened and ultimately used against us as part of "Corrective" reprogramming. It's very disturbing to know that for now, the most accurate recent memory acquisitions are the property of Google. And if we want to find the truth from an unbiased witness, you need to hack baby, hack. (Did you plant that cookie?) We have a new mirror of karma and it never lies, and it never forgets.

Beating to the National Funk & Why Brainwashing Isn't Always a Bad Thing

                         Can you carry a tune? It's a lost art like sight reading. Cultures soon have to die. Sheet music goes unread. We don't even want to remember what hip used to be like. We only remember how much we hate each others music. And how much we hate each other. Vinyl melts. Diamonds rust. Nostalgia corrodes. Bit files degrade over time . Memories are now intellectual property prohibited by international copyright law. Nothing is sacred except for the real estate property on which our religious traditions are founded as envied tax shelters. Gospel is now a kind of music. So is Country. Religion is just politics, Beating to the National Funk.

                         Instead of trying to change the way other people think, "Why don't we just go back to producing better music?" Wouldn't you think that everybody might just want to sing along? Well, if you hum a few bars, I'll try to keep up. You know you want to.

                         Oh, I forgot. You're trying to get me to show you how to change someone else's mind for you. Oh. There's nothing wrong with my thinking. It's just, I'm just supposed to help you get inside someone else's mind against their wishes, so you can correct how they think. (And you think I'm crazy.) I can't imagine why you think I should have to interpret for you. What it is that you that think is so very wrong with my thinking? You are right. There is no reason why I should always disagree with you this much, but I do. And speaking for myself, I am sorry. Maybe I just like being difficult. Frankly, I don't understand why you're so afraid and I personally don't care about your selfish personal issues. And besides, you don't want me to tell you, you're unrealistic and selectively ignorant. You just want me to help you change the minds of everyone else in our Country, with it's sentimental Country Western, and it's dangerously Paranoid Right Wing Lunacy. I keep telling you, brainwashing isn't always just about telling other people what to think. Sometimes, occasionally we all need a good rinse. And then we all can be, equally silky and manageable, together. Why discriminate? When you start washing other peoples brains we can get awful dirty in the process.

                         Let's start with the most obvious rational point of mutual departure. As the Psychic Entertainment Medium, I am not "The Art of Living Fiction." I am not even the urban legend, Zenophile. I'm just plain delusional. No one ever reads me, you never will. No one ever has. Not the Government, not the Russian Porn Mafia, not Google. And certainly not you. Never, not even. You are merely indulging in a private guilty pleasure as an innocent voyeur to my very systematic self disassembly by disassociation. You at present are not reading me, or my very auspicious webslim for signs of life left over after from your very critical mass of shared poisonous boredom. You don't want to believe that a deluded evil genius like me knows exactly how to save your dismal little realities from boringly self contained cerebral ego implosion. Sorry, but beings as it was evil genius that got you into this confusion, you might need a total psychopath like me to help get you back out alive again. You know, I think can dance to this, the Beating to the National Funk.

                         Let's go back to our initial beginning. You've decided a long time ago, you don't like anything that I've been writing since the very beginning. Always with my obsession with non violent neutrality, and then bumping it up with "Complementarity." How dare I disagree with you, when I refuse to argue? Let's examine your terms. You don't want me looking at your hands. "Do you?" That just means you're probably still not showing your hands to anyone else either, yet. So even if the proof of Human Variability still escapes you, you still smugly judge me to be your obvious mental inferior, because of that whole "Psychic" thing. Someone has to sweep away your ashes after you're gone. So now I ask you. If I can change your national mind, how would I be any better? (Wait. That's not the question you wanted me to answer for you, is it?) I can see I'm going to have to use some fancy dancing, to sell a Beating to the National Funk. Independence? It's a good thing.

Mutual Exploration; Keeping Silence Becomes Hello, Yes, Hello

                              Why do we persist in pretending, pretending to think we are always going to be knowingly better? Mutual ignorance however, is real. But when we ought to know better; We still can project. We judge. We blame. We deny. We alienate. We discriminate. But we still persist in pretending, pretending that we are supposed to know better. We pretend we know better than each other, who's supposed know better they we do. My knowing is supposed to be so much better than your knowing better. What? We pretend to be authorities on every other persons issues. We pretend by thinking, there is no answer to why people are so ignorant of each others feelings and needs. We are literally ignorant of each others ignorance. We are also glaringly ignorant of our own ignorance. And the resultant horrible barrier to which we succumb to in our mutually supplied ignorance. Why do we persist in pretending to ourselves to know better about each other? We all know why people pretend. We don't want to have to care about each others problems all the time. "Why won't anyone listen to me?" says the bleating of the newly affluent liberal guilt. "My pretenses are no less pretentious than yours," I'm saying. Has liberal empathy become a competitive sport? What ever happened to our human relationships? I'm actually asking. Must I stoop to condescend?

                              Newly rich comfortable democrats don't want to live in my neighborhood. (Or maybe you do. My perfumed ghetto is now getting gentrified for your discerning real estate appetites. Even migratory wildlife escapes into the park lands of our new inner city affluent middle America.) You don't want to see the crimes and poverty that is being dumped into our best cities from across the globe, domestic and foreign. So you get into your fine cars and beautiful lofts, and rise obliviously spacey to the vibrant squalor of living urban culture that your depend on for your daily life. You go into your clubs, spas and resorts, but the crime for you stays out on the street. (Or does it?)

                               Soon a nobody like me comes out of the gutter to reverse slum your emotional poverty into an equally pretentious liberal objectivity. Are you afraid to speak out? I am. And I'm supposed to be one of you. I'm not afraid of my government. I'm afraid of you. You silence me. You are actively ignoring me. Yes, I said you. You are the ones who are ignorant about me, and you are not my government. My government listens to me, but it still does not yet understand. You're pretending to listen, but instead hear only every little piece of the wind that comes off of the hill. But a new, unfamiliar unsanctioned voice such as "Mine," is muted in the censoring breeze of mass group speak. No new voices have been heard from since the war of words was called off for rain. No new solutions have been offered up, and no real progress is being made to confront the mutual void of understanding. We have nothing. We are all equally mutually ignorant and as a result are also dangerously codependent.

                               How are we any different from anyone else? If we want to understand why others may be so ignorant, shouldn't we just be asking ourselves this question, "Why am I so ignorant?" What is it that I don't want to know about? Hello, yes, Hello. This is not a rhetorical question. Evasiveness has been hardwired into our instincts. Ignoring something or somebody doesn't always make them go away. Trying to ignore each other is a learned evasion reenforced by fashionable ignorance. The flaking facades of authoritative religious Rightness and our contrarian secular Leftness, leaves us supporting each other in conflict only. No one seems to want to say, "Hello, yes, Hello." "Is there something I can do to make it easier for you not to want to ignore me?" I'm not giving up on my non violence, not ever. But please don't push me. I'm not sure why people hate each other so much, and maybe that's just me being ignorant. The question becomes, "Can't we all just get along?" and why do we always have to blame someone? Am I the only person who sees answers?

Make Fear Your Tailwind Living in the Zone

                                  Fragile egos run the worlds businesses. The media doesn't just tell us what to buy. Media tells the governments when we think differently. If the worlds governments would prepare for the inevitable drifts in public opinion biases, then they would no longer need to control the popular media. But because of the precipitous erosion of our conflicting faiths, we don't just distrust each other. We are taught to hate each other. But there is no infantile hatred, or inherited bad karma, or original sin to justify the poisons we heap on innocent children of the world. But when I ask you, "Can you forgive the hater?" You all look at me with such disgust, I can feel your hatred for me too.

                                   We all face the same fearful threats inflicted on all warrior martyrs through history, who've passed before us. Prejudice is a problem of false profits. Hate is ultimately simply bad for business. Sooner or later we all must account for our mutual prejudices. I say there is no greater prejudice than blaming, and that prejudice of believing that someone is beyond having anymore prejudices. None of us is better, no one is immune to our shared need for collective mass enlightenment. No one is without bias.

                                  When we try to say, "But I'm not prejudiced." Is this not just a form of blaming? When we come at people with the pretense of a moral superiority, are we not being morally corrupt? When we judge people for their voluntary and involuntary ignorance, are we not ourselves being aggressively ignorant, and using that vaunted ignorance as justification for our own continuing hostile reciprocal prejudices?

                                   Now we can come to that divisive fear that is being used against us to get us to fearfully blame, silence and censor each other. Are we too afraid to look inside ourselves in order to see and understand that hatred that others employ to divide us? Are we so deluded with pretenses of religious or political correctness that we stopped seeing any viable answers for the understandable evasions of all people. Don't be afraid to look inside yourself in order to see and understand that fear that can bind anyone. My implicit prejudices follow me everywhere. When I see young gangbangers in my building, not everyone shares my fear. My fear is not a constant by which I can prejudge others even when I have real cause to fear for my safety. I too am prejudged because of my fearfulness. But I myself fortunately, am not afraid most of the time.  But I still must accept, that I too can have changing prejudices. Can you say that? I want to hear you say it. "I too am afraid." "I too am afraid to look inside myself to see my fear and hatred of other people."

                                    Now as I have written, misanthropy itself is in fact often only a variable factor of temperament by degrees. We should not misjudge people on the basis of mere factors of temperament which do not effect peoples essential principles of goodness and loving human kindness. A certain amount functional misanthropy is just a common given, it is neither good nor bad. Prejudices about temperament are some of the most tragic, because these can bias our perceptions about people and our variable differences of relative strengths and or frailties. Being a shameless Xenophile myself, for me is in fact a bit of a problem. Xenophilia is never an excuse for some supposed universal goodness on my part. My innate Charismatics for me in fact is a horrible curse. But that being said, I do have an odd advantage when it comes to pleasant diplomacy and an effective conflict resolution. But I also am very dangerously harmless, and my passivity is frequently confused with an indifference. I can assure you however, I am not conflicted about carrying on the good news to you. Even though you have been fighting me vehemently kicking and screaming all the way. That excitation reflex your feeling, it's a good thing. Ride it. You may have a duty to work with me sooner or later. And I'm still here for you. For now. Peace out.

Love Is the Answer to the Deaths Caused by our Corrupted Spiritual Fictions

                            A truthful Rage of Compassion means "Forgive but never forget." Love the hater, but never love the hate. Heal the opposition from within and without. Mass enlightenment is not about personal bias. When I told a friend I write Spiritual Fictions he says, "Isn't it all spiritual fiction?" As the only secular humanist in a staunch family of German Catholics, my gym buddy says, "In my family I never talk about religion or politics." This guy is Hot, Smart, and very Successful.

                            I tell my friend more about what my studies have revealed, "Scriptures are neither allegorical or gospel fact, they're documentary histories." I point out how the earliest written record of epidemiologies and the codification of sundry practices of cleanliness are from the Old Testament. I iterate, "Moral Codes are essential to all religious dramas." "Even our Ethics came from the Syncretism of our merging traditions." "Recording these literary masterworks wasn't always a corruption of spiritual traditions, at least not from the beginning." I suspect, "Pluralism may become an antidote for political dualism, monotheism, and exclusive ancestral loathings." "We need to appreciate what a spiritual fiction says, but we don't have to agree or disagree."

                            "What are you working on today?" my friend asks referring to which lifts I was going to be doing. I said, "I'm here to work on my book," and that I was there to meet someone. He's taken an interest in how I've documented the very peculiar Russian engagement into accessing my blog. So Anthony asks me, "Are you still poking the (Russian) Bear?"

                             I tell him again about the legal surveillance the Russian Porn Mafia uses to data mine the American dirty mind. I said, "What makes government surveillance so dangerous is the ability to influence people." "We're not just political animals anymore, we're also now loyal consumers."

                           

Locked In? Or "Why "Donbot" Can't Read" / Rages From In Cages & Other Entangled Social Topologies

                                In wanting to profile the "Presbot," it's been all to easy to predict exactly what was going to happen. And if you want to check, yes I wrote it all down. As much as I'm disgusted by his image being burned into my unwilling memory, I'm glad I've ended up with the job that he actually wanted. I'm talking about the only job the "Donbot" could have ever fulfilled, and that's "Dark Satirist." (Tragically, he never laughs. I find it disturbing though very funny to see his fat head dangling between my legs.) Only difference of course is that I'm a just another poor Snowflake on steroids, and that I actually like all people excluding my family. And I also have an very long attention span. Thank you very much.

                                Now even the Russian Porn Mafia has finally decided to leave my computer alone for the time being. But they will be back. They never get anything I don't share for free. I show the tracks of their legal ongoing market surveillance, and I kept all the URL's of the diverse interesting international web sites they use to hide behind. I think it's very interesting that a nobody like me can catch this obvious scam where most of us would be too scared to admit looking. {Don't use unwanted tags. I always misspell "His" name on purpose.}

                                What's most telling, is in today's "Wall Street Journal" he's given a pass on the basis of so called "outsider naiveté." Why is it that some people can never forgive themselves for buying into that intoxicating poisonous cocktail of market frenzy. Riding that bubble of economic narcissism is just way too addictive for a certain flavor of sociopath. Some people don't seem to experience healthy loss the way the rest of us do, it's always about winning at someone else's expense. Hollow lonely satisfaction for the class pretentious. What is the real payoff for being an emotionally impoverished consumer? Well, empty hedonism of course. Some people are just never happy, they must have more, always more! That's not my problem.

                                Add the fact that "Trumphenstein" is a revenge killer and now we are all locked into a dark satirical revenge movie with reality programming overtones driving the narrative. We are all held captive witnesses to this thing's ignorant vendetta. He may in fact be totally ignorant of any real collusion. He didn't really care at all one way or the other, "Can't someone else look into it?" Culpable deniability isn't just a river in Egypt. How many more careers will he set to self destruct as blame continues to get dumped off onto the next in line for command?

                                Is there any good that is going to come out of all this? As I've said all along, "Your damn right we're going to make something good come out of all of this." All I say is please, please people, be forgiving to the gullible. Our neighbors are going to need us to be big about this. In four years we may indeed be saying thank you, for our failed 45th hyperactive president, who I'm sure can't even read. {Wait, still too soon? Eww sorry. Maybe next time.}

Spaghetti Logic & Untangling the Evasions of the American Identity Crisis {Edited for Clarity}

                               Re-socialization Parties will soon become the norm along with mutual support systems workshops which can train subscribers with new contact sensitivity skills. The standard Chem. Dep. recovery model, will soon be expanded to include non disease oriented resocialization practices. Most people are not well prepared to deal with other peoples dissimilar experientially biased opinions. Functioning human relations geniuses are often not easily offended by normal peoples tangled Spaghetti Logic Biases. We will often have to know how to remain sensitively non partisan. This is much more of a burden than most people are going to want to endure. But we all do learn from the ever lessoning of abusive political hostilities. The elephant in the room has come out of the closet, now so do we.

                               Out growing these normal fixations on understandably sorrowful personal opinion biases, is going to become a useful but reviled therapeutic alternative. Healing conflict is much more effective therapeutically than is mere popular psychology and psychiatry. These maturing practices for linguistic reframing aren't without applicable precedence. But the degree to which most people have succumbed to the political and religious manipulations of populist personal biases, pro and con, is this most unpopular of all the core recovery issues. General prejudices on both sides of virtually every one of the controversial bias issues, from "Is there a God" to what to do with Government Entitlements has most people emotionally over invested. This split opinion bias is now being used against you, to prevent you from being informed socially effective. Right fighting is just arrogant, and aren't we all a little arrogant when we need to righteously change other peoples minds?

                               My upcoming accompanying article is on being "Locked In." We expose the normal blight caused by common industrial loyalties. Loyalties are in fact some of the most difficult of all social barriers to reprioritize. Were we not creatures of bias, paradoxical language and arbitrary loyalties, social reframing and reprioritization would not have to be such a loaded issue. Why would anyone want to admit to being brainwashed and bought in? Many of the most intelligent Liberals who used to read me as the meta physician, now loath my work because I'm advocating a politically neutral opinion bias for the sake of collective re-socialization. I myself am very openly opinionated and I strongly worship non violence. But I also understand destructive human nature and abuse personally. I want to stop being judged for being another lone survivor. But what I've survived is something most Doctors of Psychiatry and Political Scientists are extremely prejudiced about. The common misunderstanding is that I too am automatically going to be just another malignant abuser.

                               More tangled Spaghetti Logic, and this time it's coming from the top authorities of powerfully ignorant leaders. If we really want to understand the true nature of our shared human dilemma, we need to forgive each other as much as possible. But we also need to develop a more accurate and forgiving approach to depolarizing the common self hatred and bias of politically biased blaming, pro and con. Hate, vengeance and hostility are all understandable, but hate is always dysfunctionally unsatisfying. Mass recovery isn't just about you or me, healing is a total "Us proposition. What needs to be done now, is to untangle our mass distorted thinking and unresolved conflicts, through a more accepting approach to understanding our shared human histories, and our normal if all too common outrages against common human failings and vulnerable frailties. We are not blank slates of learning. If we need to learn how to help others let down their guards, we must learn to be more open with those we can't control. The American Chronic Identity Crisis is not about "Who are we?" But I ask, "Who will we become," and "Why?"