experimental modeling in blog form

                  Friends yawn when I mention that I blog. Humor? Commentary? Art? Social Criticism?

(I think I hear more yawning.) Question becomes; How do we scientifically prove the predictably inevitable shifting of opinion biases in today's modern societies?  

                  We all have selective reasoning, so in order to understand changing opinions we must dialog. Blogging is an experimental modeling proof, opinions do change. Changes are predictably inevitable as are vocal perspectives. In therapy we use Selective Reinforcements and Intermittent Support to facilitate intended changes. 

                  {I'll tell you why I'm not afraid of my government. Business and mass media have split my country into contentious democratic adversaries. The far right have always given it's constituents infinite "Gun Rights." And now there are so many home arsenals that my Gov. is afraid of us. (And I don't even like guns.) If the "States" ever went to war against it's own stubborn and adolescent public, the Gov. would loose bad. And the "State" knows it. Now we just have to avoid getting shot. I'll never carry firearms! 

                   SO WHY IS EVERYONE SO AFRAID?

                   There are many countries where the word "Gangster" now means Freedom Fighter.

                   

                   And of course, we're all hardwired for "rational" cowardice. (We're designed to respond to fight and flight. Even when we're being "Amorally Conformist" to a popular tyranny of force.) Our own American Apartheid and the Middle Eastern Diaspora, moves and changes all peoples.

                   The continuity of context is our boundary for linking up new proximal associations.  We've established new socially linguistic alignments, a Thesaurus of social changes, similarities of common differences with an acknowledged  history of mutually shared denials. Changes are always becoming more inevitable. (And I believe very positively so.) 

                   Question becomes; How do we scientifically prove the inevitability of our shared shifting opinion biases? (I think I hear more yawning.) That's Social Science. And as every Empiricist knows, science has no place in society. You can't prove the existence of truth outside an evidentiary chain of proofs which are never perceptible without experimentation. Experimentation requires that thought experiment precedes testing, hence nothing is proven without first hypothesizing. Imagination is purely speculative, Art is experimental by design, Thought is by it's action, willful invention. Words, Music, Imagination. Life and beauty are all just questionable hallucinations of pure love. Why bother proving that opinions do predictably change? No one believes a word I'm saying. SWEET.

Sensitive Emotional Boundaries (+++)

           "Personal Boundary Space." Defining your own emotional boundaries and sensitivities can be critical to understanding others. We must take responsibility for being aware of other creatures feelings. We need to protect ourselves. Being able to appreciate people as distinctive individuals is a virtue and a gift. Being able to read mind's is just an inconvenient side affect of caring. I love my job. But I need to be very be careful. As "Sensitives," we so called "Psychics" have to protect ourselves. Plus all people have some kind of "BIAS FEAR," identifying ourselves as either pro or con to each person's defining boundary issues.

            I prefer people come to me with some skepticism. Point is I don't have to let my own personal biases get in the way of me working with people.  Telling you this helps weed out the stragglers. I don't want unreceptive clients. I don't want people to agree with me. I prefer people to be much different from me.  In working with people I like not having to judge other people or take their inventory. Now this is where you find the real pros. I'll demonstrate using some personal biases and basic boundary issues of my own;
                               
            I've love looking at peoples hands. Palms and Handwriting. Voices and Eye contact, I get to hold peoples hands, thousands of them. I feel your hands. Everyone's hands feels different to me.  I use models to demonstrate the actual statistics to map for variability. This is a thousand times more sane than this sounds. I'm perfectly aware of how different people feel about these issues. I'm always supporting people in faith. And I love people, whatever you believe. I also do inductive massage, touching and feeling other people's pain. Treating pain, grief and loss, I am loathed by psychics who say that I'm not a true believer, and that I'm just doing it by the numbers. However, I've enough faith in myself to want to master my craft. DO THEY?

             I'm a very gifted reader.  But I don't have to believe in any of it at all. I'm just really good at it. Too good. And I don"t believe in any of it. And I make it work. I love reading for people and it's hard work.  I have pride in my work. It's not about my personal biases, at all, ever.

            This exemplifies the practical absurdity of being a psychic. I also have issues. And I feel it is more than disrespectful for me to disregard anyone else's opinions, it is not my place to criticize. I'm not complaining. I do actively experience life as a sensitive. I think it's good luck to be authentic. I totally buy into the pure magic.  What I get to do with people is not easily ignored. This isn't about me. It never is. And I'ld like to prove it to you.  Looking at people's hands. Looking into your eyes. Listening to your voice. Touching your bodies. I choose when not to be attracted to people, I don't like sexual tension. "Intuitive Apprehension" and "Intuitive Tension" creates a boundary between ourselves and each other. In the "Mirror of Karma," written about in the "Tibetan Book of the Dead."  all of our good and evil deeds are reflected therein.  Attachments come with disincentives and moral hazards. Attractions are not always desirable.                  
       
            I myself have "Neutral Opinion Bias Fear" I don't want to take sides. Even my own. The opinion biases between believers and non believers, are self serving denials. Detractors and advocates are often antagonistically similar.  When it comes to psychics, most people are fortunately a little skeptical. Being sensitive to different people's beliefs and desires has made getting to see peoples hands fun and easy. People almost always like my readings very much. I make people very comfortable. I too have strong Biases, but my biases are just as often neutral. Let us proceed to our next most immediate sensory boundary.

             How do we percieve each other? With our senses. People either enjoy being read or not. If you let someone read you, you should have the choice, it should never be an abuse of power. The easiest people for me to read are the dry stoics, largely because they think they can't be read. Fortunately people with thick boundaries can also be very shrewd and perceptive and are often the best readers themselves. Though they, (and maybe all of us) are denying that we might be missing something important.

               I do not believe in type casting, but I will be going over maps for the analysis and comparison of types and typologies. Getting past the Typographic Number Theory of human variability means that eventually this data will turn to mush in your brain, and then when you least expect it you will make perfect sense. We are all, "Still Learning."

Kali Ascending by June Moon

                                           By June "Moon" Hanson at <junemoon.com>

                  "Shiva without Shakti is a corpse." (Shakti without Shiva is a thug.) The ascetic (Shiva) lying slain at the feet of the goddess (Kali) gave his life in sacrifice to prove his devotion. Kali (understandably) refused to follow any man. In her rage of independence, she killed her lover and consort. Shiva represents the subjective rational dispassion of the enlightened Godhead. Shakti (Kali in this case) represents the passionately objective animating force of life, raw spirit free from the weight and ballast of mere reason. It is said the extended tongue symbolized her awareness of having gone too far. These mutually defining extremes of divine nature, are mutually creative and thus destroying. Every detail of this tableau symbolizes the richness of a tradition with a cellular integrity. From her stellar hair and lightning at her feet, to the Cobra round his neck and drum of time in his hand, the mythos is complete.

                    This particular painting is hidden between the bathrooms in a bohemian cafe called, "Hard Times Cafe." The blur is from a plexiglass shield. Dearest JUNE, "We Love You."

Boundaries of Identification (++)

                                           

                         Palmistry documents are near the bottom of the page: The types of signs on anyone's hands are mostly just attributes. It's not necessary to attach importance to the personal nature of a person's individual psychic reading. You are given permission to closely examine and analyze each person's identifying features. There is still much confusion about the differences between a palm reading {Maps being read by a Reader,} and the oracle itself {The Maps read themselves.} The reader translates for you what they are reading, the oracle is just a way of storing and processing the information you will have to translate for your clients. You can get a unique astrology reading from your Astrologer from the unique unusual combinations of the possible configurations, but the good reader is still just a translator. [The medium is not the message.] It is not necessary for me to assume to know everything about you, but it is wise to know how, where and why we'r able to find answers, even if they are in fact nothing more than a randomly assorted series of unrelated significators. There are limits. These are the Boundaries of Identification. And again the map is not the territory, not ever.

                          At present a lot of this work has been about identifying peoples individual sensitive boundaries. Recognizing boundaries is always helpful when dealing with people in any personal transaction. If you are able to recognize the distinctive details of another persons identity, that's unusual. This will make you distinctive. Soon you will be able to see the hand as a mask of the whole body. You look into the hand, you are looking into the body. Study it. Get used to recognizing the distinguishing details and differences. Unusual markings happen on unusual people. You will recognize the moods of how each one of us moves, with style. Your interpretive skills and sensitivity will get you paid. This is where being tactful is the way to be modest. These are your Boundaries of Identification.

                         Understanding the delicacy of handling people's self images is a matter of good sportsmanship. You are better off not to worry about being understood, just be sure to be understandable. Like a good bartender, "Always friendly never familiar." I don't ever try to focus on someone defects. I will always try to play to your strengths. These are some of our Boundaries of Identification. Let's get to it. {I don't think my readers like the wheel of emotion.}

                                                          >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
                 Creative            2nd(Empty Yang)      Summer          3rd(Empty Yin)        Receptive      
                                                                       2.Adulthood
                                                                         {>}Angry                                                 
                                                                         > > > > >                                                
                     Spring      1.Youth       { ^}Happy     "O"       {v}Sad       3.Maturity        Autumn
                                                                         < < < < <                                                   
                                        1st(Full Yang)              Fearful{<}        4th(Full Yin) 
                   Fire / Up                                         4.Death                                    Water / Down 
                                                                           Winter                                                                                                                 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<            
                         If you keep studying with me you are going to get to see a lot of these annoying diagrams, these are largely done for the sake of thoroughness. You will recognize the basic ordering and arrangements of data, as is characteristic of any oracle; Tarot, Kabbalah, I Ching; all of which are modular, each is a coalescence. These are all mandalas. Modules of data. Totalistic, Hyperbolic, Analytic data. Take a unity, any unity, a whole person for instance and take them gently apart. Not always a good Idea. But now, for instance take a map of any person's totality, and that can be read very efficiently. The hand is read in the same way, as a subordinate totality representative of the whole person. The hand is then divided into quarters, and three areas vertically.

                     
               Mercury   3rd. Passive conscious                          Jupiter   2nd.  Active Conscious     
                                                                     Rationabilus
                                                                       Animalus
                                                                     Vegatabilus 
              Luna          4th. Passive Unconscious                     Venus   1st.  Active Subconscious

                          There is some encyclopedic documentation of most of these models sited on WIKIPEDIA. (Although they are frequently getting erased by Empiricists who wouldn't know an actual unknown if it bite them on the butt.) If we compare these models for analyzing hands, to the Stars, Tarot, Cabbala, or the I Ching, we'll see some unreconcilable differences between the separate models. Not all maps are the same, no matter how similar. Learn to recognize the strengths, weaknesses and subtleties of all the different types of analytical modelings. Each map is for that medium of analysis only. Don't over think. "Not all software is compatible." Joseph Campbell. 

                          1st. The life line is emerging from above the thumb. (Mars)

                          2nd. The line then departs from under the index finger. (Jupiter) 

                          3rd. It then sweeps down away from the little finger. (Mercury) 

                          4th. Ending at the bottom of the hand wrapped under the large mound. (Venus)

Ethics Are Never Private Property

                              
                      I have been belaboring this issue of Boundary Definitions by Opinion Bias because no where is our intuitive sensitivities more focused. As a sensitive it's my job to understand. This requires unbelievable style, subtlety and tact. (Style, subtlety and tact, not my words. More on my teacher later.)

                      I'm not dwelling on my own indifference to opinion biases, everyone has bias and no one can be entirely free from bias. Nor should we expect that bias is always a bad thing. When presented with alternative perspectives we all experience shifts in focus, some good, some not so good. That's not to say that all opinions are equally right. Much to the contrary, sometimes our individual blind spots are reenforced by popular ignorance or stupidity. Notice I said, "Our." There is almost nothing more difficult than having to tell the truth in the face of overwhelming popular opposition.

                      I strongly believe we have inherited a traditional moral code. I also believe we must consider ethics. Without the review and analysis of a shared moral code, we would never have acquired the means to confront the abuse of power and survive until today. Nor would we have had the need to evolve systems of ethics that allow for personal differences and the resulting conflicts that have ensued.  

                      Understanding the larger issues of these interpersonal differences of bias is our shared domain of human dynamics.  Philosophy aside I hope I've given more than ample weight to the issues of understanding biases, because this will be central to my mapping systems for the soft technologies of people reading. Can I find a way to be any more clear?

SOCIAL BUSINESS MEDIA; POST TEST

I find it strange that Google's profiling algorithms try to predict our choices by examining how we look at the information we access. I suspect the machines know more about our needs and we must accept what the programers and developers don't want to know. In essence, persuasion profiling is the latest evolution of social engineering and influence pedaling. The machines are learning how to create better people. (We can hope. Can't we?)

Let me not to the marriage of true minds Admit impediments.
Love is not love Which alters when alteration finds Or bends with the remover to remove O, no!
It is an ever fixed mark, That looks on tempests and is never shaken;
It is the star to every wandering bark, Whose worth' unknown, although his height be taken.
Love's not Time's fool, though rosy lips and cheeks Within his bending sickle's compass come;
Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks, But bears it out even to the edge of doom.
If this be error upon me proved, I never writ, nor no man ever loved.
(William Shakespeare, Sonnet 116)

Time for me is a surface boundary condition. Collapsed and atemporal. The linear point of time approaches the moment and stops at the plane of immediate contact limited by an impenetrability of this eternal never ending moment. When I experience the future, it is only here now in this instant that I am. Silly I know, but I like the fact that, time for me doesn't get confused with the expectation of an afterlife. (Is there an afterlife? After what? After now? Is there anything after now?) I can assure you, this makes me very unpopular with other mediums. I channel the memory of the dead, and the Echo of an Imprint for me is a kind of timelessness. Thank you for asking. Let's do this again.
                                   
When this Google accounts window started appearing, my Blogger and G+ separated and I've had to add each page manually into my G+ Social Business Media. G+ already came with plenty of quirky "BUGS." Is this another one of them? I like G+ and my Blogger fine, in spite of all the problems. (Like backlink erasures) But it would be nice to know that GOOGLE is able to correct coding mistakes in Elements rather than just adding patches and extra code volumes to cover up mistakes. It would be terrible if you end up with the same kind of vulnerabilities that haunt Windows.

Discreet closure and Speculative Arts

                                
                    Discreet Closure is the means by which we are able to dispense information in it's most compressed and harmless state. ("Obscurity is not a virtue." Benoit Mandelbrot, "FRACTALS IN NATURE")

                    Offering a scientific overview of my work, I'm continuing to write this blog. It's mood and style changes. Focusing on the less academic aspects of reading and diagnostics may be very cathartic for me, but it may not have the appeal that purely technological data has. I do believe that in the long run this literary exercise is going to have varied audiences with very different needs. (This has very much come true.) Ideally I'm going to be able to re collate everything into much more readable formats. I'm amending already posted pages with corresponding graphics and diagrams. I'm providing histories of shifting and evolving opinions on science and beliefs. This way with further editing and corrections we can provide a much more comprehensive document. As improvements flesh out this highly speculative work, people who have already read a certain page will be able to have their questions answered simply by me responding to the obvious holes in my assertions. "Obscurity is not a virtue." Benoit Mandelbrot, "FRACTALS IN NATURE"

                     Discreet Closure is the means by which we are able to dispense information in it's most compressed and harmless state. When the governments of the world observed the lose of intelligence workers to the stress of spying, a great deal of energy has been invested in the allocation and extreme compartmentalization of "information." The only way to provide any level of deniability is to partition everything in a way that gives only limited access to any one sensitive agent. Were we to know everything that our governments do, have done or intend to do in the future, it would dis incentivize spying altogether. My mom said, "Snoopy people are the bane of the world." "Peoples concerns are for themselves alone."

                    "As they should be," I said. "The best of intentions should be motivated an enlightened selfishness." I was a precocious child. She softened her assertion by adding that, "If you are snooping, be discreet and don't advertise." "It's the polite thing to do."

                     I must confess for myself, that as the guy looking through the microscope at you, I want to be able to always mind my own business. I live with a kind of protective evasiveness, namely, right or wrong I don't want, need or pretend to know anything about you, that you don't share with me directly. Discretion is the better part of valor. I'm not looking for validation. I prefer working in the dark. When I'm wrong, I'm wrong. If I'm right I don't need to know. Let my work speak for itself. There are no objective observers. I enjoy and respect critical thought and if and when my work generates support I suppose that is a kind of validation. But I don't get caught up in the conformational biases of people telling me what they want to hear. Nor do I want to be telling people only what gets me paid. I'm already a very kind empathic person and being vulnerable to other peoples needs and feelings, puts me at a gross disadvantage. I have to be clinical, detached and dispassionate. When you want to waste my time turning the microscope on me, I know you aren't going to know anymore about me than I do. (Surprise! Sorry.) Saturation is not without it's functional utility. "Discreet closure is the opt out clause in all contract relations." You don't have to listen to me, but if you do, you should make an appointment just like everyone else.

                     Were I able to suddenly put all my academic specifics for reading technologies in blog form, with all the diagnostics and statistics, I would have to be a genius. I would also be resisting the narrative. We humans are not designed to absorb or process data without emotions, no matter what misinformed people tell you. This is one of the most pernicious problems of government intelligence. Denying people's feelings leads to burnout. All surveillance is speculative, until it is verified. And even then it is subject to review. If we consider the diplomatic needs of a healthy "complementarity" in human relations, we must accept limits the on how much any person can know, witness or understand. Perspective in topology is thought of as fiber bundle space, with moving lines of view, motion is continuity. There is this paradox of relative objectivity, whenever we come to observing or studying people. And again, Mom says, "If you are snooping, be discreet and don't advertise." "It's the polite thing to do."

Asserting Our Newest Wealth

                                                          
                         I am going to attempt to demonstrate that information is the only real form of viable currency today. The irony of this statement is that many of us live in graduate school ghettoes.

                        Newest Core Concept: We are going to construct, "INFLUENCE MATRICES."

                        In tracking the disseminating of new information we observe lines and vectors of influence. This simple phenomena can be observed as a transformative medium of truth. Let's demonstrate:

                        How many of you had ever heard of an Opinion Bias before reading my blog? Even fewer of you had ever considered that the opinion bias is a shifting system dynamic. When we communicate, we generate and disseminate information. When we listen and learn new things, our opinions grow and change. I used to the think the Catholic church was never going to change. I'm so glad I'm wrong. Interestingly enough, even my research told me I would be proven wrong. (Even many rabid fundamentalist Catholics don't want their church to grow and adapt.)

                        When information is generated and disseminated into groups and society, even this sways peoples opinions. And not always in a uniform fashion. We often observe upheavals and discontinuities in the mass proliferation of a "TRUTH." We started here with something relatively harmless like psychic reading, so we can observe and model for the transformation of biased truth. Invariably, we have observed several of the "Shock Values," with the evolution of perceived truth, Pro and Con. (SHOCK VALUES is a term borrowed from differential calculus to describe the abrupt acceleration of a rate of change as it jumps out of a linear continuity into a non linear point set. This creates the computational, "Shock Values," and they are often occur at unexpected and unpredictable points.) We don't always anticipate abrupt accelerating rates of changing change. It is therefore not necessary for me to try to persuade people. I find it much easier, and more fun, to merely inspire and entertain. Hence the itinerary of being the consummate entertainment medium. And this is how it's done. (Is this shocking enough for you?)

                       As our society has encountered and assimilated new transcultural influences, we have come to adapt to ever accelerating rapid rates of change. Advances in diet, language, politics and even faith are transforming our shared cultures as we speak. People are going to have to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century. But that is neither your job or mine. Let the truth speak for itself. It's our newest wealth.

The Power of the Heart (+)

  

{This heart is not mine. I downloaded it from the examples files of the Pacific T graphics calculator.}

                        This is a great time to talk about the only spiritual force stronger than death. I'm talking about love and that force of attraction that draws all people together. If we are to imagine that, "Love is the Law" we must allow for that strength of vulnerability. The secret or "esoteric" traditions often come back to this liturgy of love.

                         As a psychic I have the mixed pleasure of playing many roles. As a challenge of understanding, I experience each and every person as unique. This moves me. Even with friends I can imagine their pains. Their joys. Their difficulties. This can be an immense burden. I am an ecstatic, the pain can be unbearable. But my work is never about me. I have been given a good heart. All I have to do is count my blessing and the pain doesn't seem so bad. I'm always in constant change to fit the needs of each and every person. I'm a freak. I get to see that power of the heart whether I like it or not. Check out books on Tantric sexuality, Taoist sexual medicine and the dimensions of the human social dynamic. Study human relations and the subtleties of human differences, attractions and dynamics. I dare you. You will be rewarded for your love by others, yourself and the human heart.

                         I am often asked, "What is going to happen between me and my sweetheart?" I always say, "That is none of my business."  "But I will tell you what you will probably do." I'm not going to spoil the ending by telling people what to think. Besides, were we able to control the outcome of events, that would be way too cold. For all the pain and trouble that life brings us, why pretend to know what the future brings? (Even if I know.)

Shared Realities

                   I study the stats feature of my blogs, since I first opened each one of them. I don't want to confuse myself or others with comments. This is my best attempt at "Blind Reading."

                   I just saw two people from across the Atlantic sharing very specific posts. Hallelujah. My intent is to represent an influence of change exercised gently through the predictably transformative power of truthfulness in our changing society. I have tried to appeal to your strengths and intelligence. After reporting that a Russian porn business was doing almost all of the linking to my blog, I was suddenly dropped about a year ago. Maybe I was banned in Russia, but I have been offering people can repost everything. So maybe it's just wiser for people to access my controversial research through much more secure channels than we have here in the States or in Russia. I am working on mapping out behaviors of shifting personal and popular opinion biases. Influence is a tree that should be rooted in truth, bearing fruits of truthfulness as well. (Editorial Integrity)

                    Once I had started using google plus (you tube) to show my math movies, I've lost control over almost all of my information. As I predicted, I'm the blind reader. The feedback I'm getting is through the blog stats only. I'm lucky if anyone actually still reads my blog anymore. No problem. I've been observing some very interesting behaviors that suggests that my work on market research and social movements has made mine a very conspicuous blog. And yes, I am getting read. There are people coming to the "Blog" itself, instead of just uploading reissued private access copies. This is what I really want. I don't want people to be ashamed of the neutrality of my "Anti Opinion Bias, Biases." There are some biases that are silly on both sides. "Complementarity" is an inevitable force for change. How can anybody take sides when the powers that be are corrupt on both sides of very controversial issues?

                   Thank you for your participation in this rare and potentially beautiful literary experiment, which is becoming a force for change. (We maybe members of a school of very well educated readers.)

The Alert Spoiler (+)

                   Spoiler Alert! Building a Better Psychic Mouse Trap, Beats a Path to my Door!

                   You know that longing your feeling? It could be the turning point. When you feel the boundaries of your known world, you can feel very much alone. Right before the satisfaction of understanding a very difficult problem, there is often an extreme boredom. I've been blessed with a very trusting, forgiving nature. And yet in my advancing years I have come to know the violence that dwells in men's hearts. This is often an unanticipated consequence of the honest inquiry into the domain of the human nature. One might expect that someone as gentle as me, would never be asked to be the enforcer. How wrong we can be.

                   Knowing exactly what people are going to do can really wreck havoc on an otherwise beautiful dating life. I have chased away all the stragglers. I tell them, "Run away as fast as you can, run away while you are still free." "I want you to get away from me." "I will love you death."

                  (Somewhere in the future.) It's so wonderful to get to meet with you here again, here in the future, we always knew you were coming. Is there anything that I can do to make you more comfortable right now? This can't be easy for you. This is a very strange place that no one else has ever told you about before. You may have read about these parts in a book some where, some time, some how that you can't quite remember. But it all seems so familiar, as if you knew. We were planning for you to be able to get back with us again, eventually. How did we know? Was it the boredom? Was it loneliness? Was it that damn endless longing and hunger that led you back to us, here again?

                  I have told you a story, half asleep, that I knew you would partly understand. But I also knew you had to be trusted. You had to decide for yourself that you wanted to remember. I did not want to startle you. I knew that if you were told what to expect, you might not believe you'd be able to go through all that you needed to do. So, instead I gave you a spoiler alert so you could hear the story, enjoy the drama and still not know, the story is about you. You are the medium, the message, you are the maestro. If I had told you exactly what was going to happen in a way that you believed, you would never have come back. Isn't there enough heartache in the world without depriving people of freewill. Deterministic prognostication is at best just more bad art. So I made you a better psychic mousetrap, so you too, might get swept up in the gentle path beaten to my door. I really do love you. Please, if you can, be well. And if when you are ready, remember yet a present, I loved you all the while.

Selling Your Soul On A Buyers Market (+)

                   Zenophile Game Porn: These are the search words someone used to get to my "Shared Realities" post dated; May 21st, 2014. I wrote on the use of Games Theory in the international marketing of porn. The post updates my observations about people sharing particular posts across geographical boarders. The behavior of my reader's reading habits have been a goldmine of research information for me. I construct educational programs for becoming psychics. I predict a rosy future for the mass marketing of spiritual technologies. (Actually Possible.)

                   My proposition is this; I can teach people how to use spiritual technology in business, over the web. I'm getting this done over here. I don't know what's going on over in your country of origin. My PSYCHIC PERSONALTY INVENTORY is very sellable. With my system of assays and batteries, people can agree to read each other with each other's total permission. The game is dependent on people being in agreement. I've already released it into general society. My "Method" of Psychic Reading is the perfect good time party game. What an icebreaker. Reading parties are already big in Eastern Europe. Vulnerability for some of us, is our only remaining freedom. Reading technologies are here to stay. Our society's obsession with magic is only going to get worse. People want the fair comforting reassurance of a skilled soothsayer. Nobody ever said, the game is fair.

                    Bartenders maxim, "BE FRIENDLY BUT NEVER FAMILIAR."

                    Somebody, and it's probably not going to be me in my country, is going to get very rich reselling my learning modules. "Complementarity" has come of age.

                    Social space is our final frontier. Touch is a universal language of understanding. Spiritual Soft Technology rules. My products sell. The only real challenge for me is protecting myself. Refusing revenue frees me from having people crawl all over me. I can't give you that same protection overseas.  People are reselling my "METHOD" as marketably popular media. My lesson plans are easy to understand if you look at your books. The models are specific, even when deliberately misread. I've been working observational diagnostics most of my life.  Indexing data, nothing more. I do eventually touch each person. Anything less is disrespectful. When the process comes to you, you too will take an interest in yourself. You don't have to believe me. I ask you. May I touch you? That's the game. But science is precision. Why lie when the truth is so much more interesting and entertaining? And profitable. Please everyone, show some respect for our craft.

                    Starting with the answers first, I cheat. The game is on. It's happening thousands of miles away. But not here. Why? No price tag?  I just give it away.                                
                                                             
                                                                           $ ? $ ? $

Social Linking Phenomena (+)

                                                     
                        This page is about "pastimes," shared experiences, and beliefs. I want to show you how to shape your own social data. As much as your tastes in music and your types of food, give you a shared frame of reference, we are defined by so much more. Sensitivity to style takes energy. Style is what you respond to. If you train yourself to be sensitive to style, YOU CAN TRAIN YOURSELF TO BE A PSYCHIC. This will take you to a place of exceptional  exposure. Style is always an energetic proposition. Style can't be faked.

                        When we understand the bonds of interaction between people, we, consider having limited emotional resources. Each of us has only so much energy we can use before we get burned out. One could suggest that emotions are nothing more than energetic fields. But emotions are very slippery and understanding them is not easy. My argument is not with the absurdity of emotions, but with the difficulty we have making sense out of them. Something that is emotional, acts as both a signaling and an immunological barrier. Emotions are a conscious subjective resource, and so much more. (Did I say everybody's emotions are different?)

                        Emotional resources are measured by examining the body. Language is critical. I'm sorry for being clinical about this. It's essential we find an understandable language for describing and detailing the subjective. We literally shape awareness, (Perceptual Ordination shapes our individual senses.) An emotional field is just one example. There is also a kinesthetic boundary awareness (Touch, Taste and Smell), and a visual range of perception and even an equilibrium for balance. (A Sense of Place) All this can be experienced subjectively at the same time. (And that's a lot.) As a subjective awareness has no material substance, we have only our bodies to speak for awareness. (Spinoza was the first philosopher to write about a non duality of being.) The body is the thing.

                       Mirroring someone is one way of defining shared a emotional space. Imitating someone, however isn't always flattering. There are many ways of defining the boundaries of Inter Sensory Awareness, (Conflict Resolution, Neurolinguistics, Active Listening.) Most of my work always seems to come down to defining boundary conditions. There is the boundary of self. There are also boundaries of contact. As well, there are group identities and "Self Defined Boundaries of Distinction," (mostly defined by social identification, membership or groups. {i,e. I am a boy, white, I am a gym rat, I like girls, etc. etc. etc.}

                        Most of our daily emotional resources can get used up everyday, just like needing to eat or sleep. If we are not able to recharge our emotional batteries, we experience life like someone who is hungry or tired. There are so many different factors to our daily needs. Life was very different for our ancestors. They experienced much daily emotional pain and grief. Since then, infant mortality has dropped in my country steadily. The Industrial Revolution and immigration has helped to bring millions of my fellow citizens to the U.S. People have come to live much longer as well, here in the states. Emotional variables have continued to change for each generation, especially for those of us who are employable and enjoy longer lives. Unlike us, most of our ancestors lived through much harder lives. Life is still hard for everyone, but they had to deal with grief as a consequence of daily living. There are still many people alive today who live with war and poverty.

                        When I look at your hands, I'm seeing your family history. Partly because of the mythological significance of palm reading, most people have never really looked at their own hands. Much less do we inspect and examine each other's hands. There are still places where you could be killed for being a palm reader. Start with eye training. Just look. I know what I'm asking.

                        If you decide to start doing this you will have little difficulty looking at peoples hands. Cut yourself a lot of slack, especially at the beginning. Most people will want a palm reading. And I do mean nearly everyone. It may be worth it for you, simply for that surprise of uncertainty of not knowing. That joy of wondering, with no answers, just understanding. Oh come on, I know you can do this. People will love you when you make what you say the truth.  Come on. I want to hear you be able to say it. "I Don't Know." It's the perfect place to start.

                       I want so much to make this easy and understandable. PEOPLE WANT TO BE RECOGNIZED. And you will never know what it's like until you start to do it. The books are just a way to see what you can look for. Interpretation is something learned by exposure. People will be showing you a lot more than they realize. They will be thinking about their own fate line. You"ll be looking at the size, shape, texture, coloring, depth, sensitivity and subtle motion of their hands. This gets a lot easier over time. Your resources allow you to absorb that distinctiveness for each person. And then report and interpret what you see. As a reader you don't have to be right. You must be sensible. ALL  HEALTHY PEOPLE WANT TO BE RECOGNIZED. Have fun.

The "South Park" Effect (+)

                   Here in the States, we had a cartoon series called "South Park" with foul mouth pre teens leading our nation in the direction of a rational social criticism. Lampooning the likes of Barbara Streisand, Phil Collins, and "The Biggest Douche Bag in the Universe," JOHN EDWARDS. Utterly inexcusably phony psychic JOHN EDWARDS, I hate him too. People like him ruin it for everyone. But without these little brats from "South Park" I might have been able to resuscitate my career as a psychic without the humiliation of having every younger Gen "X" male jumping down my throat. In the program, little Eric Cartman tries to prove he is psychic and of course is shown up by his other little friend who argues Psychics are all just cold reading by making overly general statements and then just watching for the reactions. It is very true that most so called psychics are really goofy and often arrogant. At the end of the episode, aliens come to earth to kidnap John Edwards to enlist him in "The Biggest Douche Bag in the Universe Contest. He of course wins.

                   After watching this popular cartoon, if you knew nothing about psychics, you'd have enough ammunition to dog pile onto anyone who ever tried to be a psychic. But it does bring us back to a most important point of departure, which is "We all cold read each other, all the time anyways." And that's not what I'm doing. I can thank "The South Park Effect" for helping to inoculate society against the abuses of bad phony psychics. (Odd, I'm grateful to a cheesy adult cartoon for informing the public.)

                  One of my readers has successfully managed to contact me, and he is the first. Without asking any questions, he's mentioned "Starting" to understand what I'm writing about. I accept the criticism, and I accept the challenge. Most of you super smart readers don't care at all for psychics, this is perfect. I feel like I should post it on my web site, "All True Believers Are Verboten." And "Skeptics Only Need Apply."

                  This blog is designed as a literary experiment, my goal is to crash through the ignorant "CRITICAL MASS CEILING." I'm documenting a best possible explanation possible for the Para Psychological Methodology. This has entailed accurate histories and analytical modeling. As I know the vast majority of my readers will never have had any background in classical literature, philosophy, statistics or the math sciences, I must devise a "Neutral Language" in order to liberate this lost art form. I've got my work cut out for me, and I'm looking forward to the challenge. Stay tuned. We now return you to your regular programing.

Bias Against Bias; Rational Bias Fear

       
                  Reason demands continuous closure, embrace the probable, eliminate the lies and correct the falsehoods that take the place of our ever growing personal experiences of learning. Taking sides often achieves nothing.

                   I've outlined many of the basic methodologies of Psychic Reading. I've explained Meta Formal Logic as means of "Enumerate Partition" for abstract quantities, which informed the ancient processes of rudimentary analysis. Astrology is mother to Astronomy, Stellar Cartography, Navigation and Calendars. Physiology was preceded by the Meta Formally Logical ancient Intuitive Diagnostics, where again we see abstract quantities uniformly divided up into; Temperaments, Elements and Meridians in Chinese Medicine. (More Clockwork) The philosophical end table of modular ancient Chinese Meta Science was "Symmetrically Coalesced" into our "I Ching", the Book of Changes.  Through mass literacy, the traditional Jewish Culture witnessed the coming alphabet of symbols translated out of the Torah into the Talmud, into the Sefer Zohar, to most strangely the Playing Cards and finally the "TAROT."  From many tiny pieces of evenly divided maps, the language of our actual modern medical palmistry is as difficult as any. We only have to look at the elegant complexities of any hand writing or the uncial fonts to catch a glimpse of what I get to look at everyday, whenever I'm reading for someone. These are the short list of tools I work from. I'm outlining traditions that came together to become our modern practices of Intuitive Diagnostics, and more casually Fortunetelling. All totalities, all Unities, all Maps.

                   :Why would such arbitrarily simplistic ways of partitioning data end up producing such sound scientific foundations? They just needed to be corrected. Independent of personal biases, we have two very significant issues.

                   1st. The shear overwhelming volume of information we have requires huge lexicons. Order demands simplicity. We have to start somewhere. Partitioning an informational space into a "Unity" divided equally by vectors, is the only way to find a language of "Self." We have simple words for "Local Symmetries," "Perceptual Orientations," and the "Rotations of an Angularity." This gives us shared language of place, perspective, variability and differentiation. I'm up, your down, right or left, backwards and forwards, successions in order, inter relations going on defined by moving boundaries. Language must be simple in order to keep up.

                   2nd. So much of what we learn about each other happens at the very deep level of preverbal sensitivities. "Echo Imprints" maybe all we have to distinguish what we feel about each other. At any point that awareness of individual distinctiveness is so undeniable, Penguins on the beach are rarely confused about "Positive I. D." The parents look out for their own baby chick, even though all penguins look the same to me.

                    Ancient practices of dividing down data sets delineated by "Local Symmetries" create "Enumerate Partitions." Reconstructed these become "Coalesced" into soft technologies that we're still learning today. As the psychic, I've become skilled at surfing these opinion boundaries in between ignorant superstitions and arrogant intellectual bigotries. (They are blood brothers.) The truth still lies somewhere in between. Not at the extremes of Bias.

                                      New Subject;           CRITICAL SENSITIVITIES 

                   This process of interpersonal differentiation is critical, even though it is largely understated behind the courtesy of group identities and a sense of belonging. Boundaries of Identification come with distinctions. This is where and why we get "Proxy Dependencies." This is how we can mutually identify ourselves and therefore we take on the language and perspectives of a "Group." It's usually a critical sensitivity that prompts a person to question and challenge a group think. Bias is not the same as actual sensitivity.

                   Even from within any group can come separate opinions, sensitivities or awarenesses. Each one of us can have unique sensitivities which may necessarily make us critical of each other. Grooming is a most beneficial expression of this co supportive mutual sensitivity. The awareness of personal differences is critical for the survival of said individuals and the group. Check relations to relative distance. People are linguistically, both objects (1.) and subjects (multiple). Mutual boundary definitions are often as arbitrary as are Sun Signs and will say nothing about a person's individual nature at all. It is often only by distinctively critical sensitivities that people become more than a mere label. Our human capacity for expression is not just for "Signatures of Identification" but we are biased to communicate personal differences through critical sensitivities. Bias is an objective, not a sensitivity.