Zenophile Legends

                  The mythic Zenophile has become predictable. A Culture of Zenophiliacs already rule the overground. The collected love of so many people is building a better world. We benefit in grace.

                  Most good ideas sound very funny at first. It's easy to make predictions, harder to predict accurately, or predictably. I myself have faith in humanity. And we are the reasons why.

                  I want to understand people. My data is about you.  My work is coming out wonderfully. Story be told, nobody is going to believe me. Nobody understands how I'm doing it. I live the double life of a Zenophile. As a reader, I'm doing this simple job of mutual social differentiation. Diversity is my betting parlor. I love my work very much. I want the information. I don't analyze people, I analyze data.

                  Has Zenophile become attached to me? I'm not the original Zenophile. Zenophilia is a contagious disease. Zenophilia isn't just a lifestyle, it's a weakness. "We love you and we can't help it." This is not my baby. It's a social experiment, to draw out other people of complementarian persuasion. Results keep proving to be true. We are seeing amazing results. The future is happening just like I wrote it. People do want accurate intimate personal accounting services.

                  PPI: Or Psychic Personality Inventory: Is the series of personal and mutual examination procedures, selected by the Querent(s) only. Querent chooses the desired boundaries for engagement. Your medium is Ideally Impartial, but personal biases can be useful too. Bias is not uncommon among the so called psychic. Reading technologies can be highly specialized and very straight forward, easy to learn with hard work. It is the combined analysis of unifying models that are mapping out the variability of each self. Physical, Emotional, etc, I'm good at my job. I like reading for people. It's just a job. It all sounds so trivial to try to write about it but,....., the story goes on.

                  Zenophiles are just people too, we who love people too. I have a center of you, in me. My job is to make contact with you.  Who's going to believe me. It doesn't matter. Anthropometrics, biometrics, social metrics, are all here to stay. I can show you the view from your profile. The map has instructions.

I Can't Undo What I Haven't Done

               
                   In our mutual interest based "new reading culture" we also get read. Good readers read other readers. I sound like a broken record. Social media interests are creating "new active reader community." We are looking at the beginnings of Competitive Complementary Reading. I wrote all of this down. I have a lot of digital paper shuffling to do. I work with really wonderful people who help me a lot and I worry terribly. I obsess. We come to ordering thoughts and memories about what we think, subject to what somethings means to us personally, we prioritize.

                   In our new reading culture, personalized business media is implied. Now the media is interactive as well. From where does one get our personal information? And how much information do you have to offer in exchange to get said personal information. The mass diversification of tastes and interests work well with the general needs of the future public. Social outreach need no longer be driven by business alone. Just watch. The privilege of authority is switching as we write.

                   We are going to be looking at our own "American Spring." But here it won't be on the streets. It's online. We won't have the military trying to keep us quiet. They won't have to. We have ways of campaigning that haven't even been thought of yet. The standard is changing and it's starting now. I know you don't believe me yet. Watch. You can't keep this many people on social media quiet. And who knows what the next social media platform is going to look like. Active users are participant representatives. Interested parties stay informed.

                    The one thing that counter lobbying works is the cultivated consumer, computer and media selective we know our way around the digital marketplace. Journalism isn't dead yet after all. There is no underground. It's a cloud. Everyone wants to read something different, now it is. Some people don't care about poverty and abuse, hardship and political oppression. Why waste energy trying to polarize people? We listen best when called. Will you answer?

The Juried Show COUNTER LOBBY

                   The juried show is gallery law. If we want to show, we must audition. Only be accepting the challenge of competition can we hope to be fair. We submit work to be judged.

                   Social business media is like collective journalism. I find LinkedIn and :ello: provide information otherwise too difficult to access through the conventional news media or search engines alone. This mutual magazine culture is the modern self generating hub for expertise. We are sharing professional experience. One possible long term effect of our evolving social media is the chance for more effective counter lobbying campaigns. This information on technological advances is for me a major boon to my research.

                     I have been documenting the dynamics of popular opinions and their changing biases on both sides of the Spirit Tech Revolution, pro and con.          The direct link is to this page. 

                   I would like to post two excerpts I submitted for review and acceptance on a comment blog through LinkeIn: Question was:         Are there different levels of souls??

Mary JimenezManager and SEO consultant at Local site SubmitTop Contributor

                     I just experienced the transition of a being very loved by me. And someone said to me that the souls of non humans are different that the souls of humans. Therefore, a psychic that speaks with spirits is different between each other as one speaks with non humans and the other with humans...

                     But spirits are spirits and I do not see how or why they would be any different. If we consider the Buddhists, then the fact that a soul can be incarnated into a worm or a cow or a man has no consequence and any psychic should/could be able to contact them...

                     Yet, if we believe that of reincarnation, then what happens with the psychics that reach out the dead and what about those who are about to die that see their long dead loved ones coming back to fetch them? illusion?

                      "There are no higher levels of awareness, there is only awareness." The Upanishads say, The Self is Ubiquitous." Corrupted interpretations of the Wheel of Karma blames people to believe we "Make our own reality." We can only accept reality. Collective Karma is resolved through the self dissolving; By living, and passing, and by detaching from expectations of higher and lower. The contributions we make are never ours. All good is shared. There is no separation between what is highest and that which is lowest. Only providence is divine. "The self is Ubiquitous." Pride and egotism can creep into any dogma.                     

                    I got a little preachy as I know most Psychics know nothing about linguistics. I added;

                    We may be confusing apples with the tree. Humans and the human form by which we can be created and are loved, is where we get our "Human" language. Listening does not have to be reduced to a language. As readers we use language. As sensitives we are sensitive. They are never going to be the same thing. It is only the human mind that thinks it is superior, an error of ego orientation. Familiars and other supportive lifeforms are not bound by the limitations of human linguistics. The awareness of self in humans is identified linguistically as "I." Philosophers and social psychologists wrestle with the place of language in the pretense of sentience in humans. If we limit human intelligence to human reading adaptations alone, we are "talking" about the achievements and pride identified with the Human Realm. Again there is no higher or lower levels of awareness, (And again I include all life,) there is only awareness. I don't know if this helps.

                     I still argue, If we want to understand uniquelly human sentience, we may be talking about aesthetics (That's the ability to choose and make selections,) not language. Most trials of submission by which our actions, deeds and offerings are judged, come down to selections made be discriminating judges. If we to rise above the prejudices of a jury, words alone must never limit the full complement of an appeal.
                 

                 

Mapping The New Territory SHAPING THINGS TO COME

Wednesday, July 3, 2013       Mapping New Territory SHAPING THE THINGS TO COME

                                    

                          I possibly can be aware of what you want me to write for you. It may be self restraint and discipline that makes what I have to say useful. It is in the meta formal, "lower level" languages of internal sensing, that make it possible to read for you, as one of a non finite group. Without a sense of the over riding structure that guides and informs our languages we all would be speaking babel. "The unbroken chain of affirmation guaranties the tradition of success." (Mine)

                          I won't waste your time with new age bullshit like, "Reality is the superposition of opportunity." I won't even say which new age guru had the gall to throw out such nonsense at a dialog between Physicists and "Spiritual" types. I live in a bohemian graduate school ghetto where new age platitudes can take the place of human relations. There is a perfectly good reason for people to laugh at me when they hear I am a psychic. I laugh right along with them. The new age ninnies have been tossing around the physics of Quantum Uncertainty to disprove the "Falsifiability," of Astrology. (Karl Popper's criteria for a Pseudoscience, which would have brought Quantum Mechanics to an end had the great physicists not embraced the probability matrix instead of wasting time on mere causal certitudes. Sorry Einstein, I still love you but we were probably wrong to want non locality to just disappear. But we can't win them all. Does Karl Popper's, "FALSIFIABILITY"  even rate as a non falsifiable scientific philosophy? It certainly isn't science. All prognosis may be inexact but it must be based on science. Forensics maybe trial and error, but it will not hold up in court unless it is believed to be science. Economic forecasts maybe as accurate as a horoscope, but it is supposed to be based on science. Medical diagnosis may be subject to second opinion, but it supposed to be based on solid science. I'm sorry Mr. Popper, your Rational Positivism has just met criteria for "falsifiability" and therefore, your own "falsifiability" may in fact qualify you as a "pseudoscientist." 

                          I do think that Karl Popper was a bit of a jerk, but going up against peoples religious beliefs in Astrology was a no brainer. I am an entertainer first, Tarot cards are sold as games. Pretenses of causal linking between the stars and eventualities aside, Astrology isn't the problem, it's superstition. Were we to challenge the usefulness of Astrology we would probably be more correct, if we make light of religiously humorless attachment people have toward reading star charts. This is about "Opinion Bias Attachment." Not bias. Something that I think we all need to consider.

                          I'm going to do something much more dastardly than lampooning Astrology. By coalescing the multiverse into a singularity. Astrology is needlessly obscure. Everyone tries to avoid uncertainties. "Everyone has blindspots and everyones blindspots are different." (My 2nd Axiomatic Proposition of a Para Psychological Method) But what if we really could smell truth? Wouldn't we have an unfair advantage? In the spirit of "The True Hoax" I'm going to not only predict the future but I'm going to show you how we make it happen all the time. Bringing forth a truth ultimately is the only (singular) eventual inevitability. The question becomes when, not if. I suspect the point Deepok Choopra was clumsily making was, that every time we make a choice we shape reality. But because people take that logic way too far, we are expected to believe that observation always effects outcome, sometimes in limited situation maybe, but sorry. That's a gross misunderstanding of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle confused with the "UPANISHADS" core principle of, "The Self Is Ubiquitous."

                           Educated guessing is at the heart of all high risk professions. The dissemination of information and influence greatly accelerates change in society. Experimentation is the key. Think of affirmation as a tree, a positive presence. Information is branching outwardly. Once you have established an anchor, structuring lines of influence changes society. Let people pay for your expertise. For the money I make, I should sweat. You come to me. I'm not on some stupid power trip. I believe in my work. It's wrong to take advantage of people's ignorance, even if other people do it all the time.

.                            I am proposing that every time we face an uncertainty our brains are designed to bring each reality into a singular focus. This way or that, when we make choices, no matter how small we are shaping reality and maybe the future. In having the audacity to confront mutually conflicting opinion biases I am identifying myself as an equal opportunity offender. I don't need to take sides. I'm pissing everyone off equally. I know most of you rational people don't even care, Pro or Con. A lot of you agree with me that uncertainty is at the core of all our problem solving, whether you agree with my choice of significant "Vital Paradoxes" or not. I may sound militant, But in fact there maybe no such thing as a nonviolent militant. We will see that in fact "Polarity," or "Valences" are in the dynamics in all social uncertainties. The <"BOOK OF CHANGES" Hexagram 38> Is a case study example for all social uncertainties involving opposing biases.

Knowing the Difference Between Innocent Naivete' and Arrogant Denial

Thursday, July 18, 2013

                              

                          Personal differences can predispose people to be utterly naive about each other. Blind spots can for most people seem like insurmountable barriers. For instance most men have a very limited understanding of the strengths and virtues of the female brain. Most woman are not that much better at understanding men. Polarity for most is like an Iron Curtain. Negotiations easily break down. Try to set a good example by not taking resistance personally. Tact is golden.

                         Watching people's responses is about the only way you will know if someone is actually hearing what you are trying to communicate. You will want to prepare yourself for the variety of evasive behaviors people exhibit. When people don't like what you are saying, don't get discouraged. Most skeptics are actually going to want to try to listen. But they have usually formed exclusively biased opinions about psychics. However, only a smaller portion of skeptics will take it upon themselves to be jerks toward you. Like I've said, they will want to think you are insane, ignorant or stupid. Try not to take it personally. Your true believers are going to be much more annoying anyways, just because they will want you to be just like them, in faith as well as in bias.

                          If you can see past personal biases you simply change the game to include the person you are reading to. They don't have to agree with you. But you will have to be agreeable to them, You will want to frame what you say for that particular person. But don't pretend you are going to change anyone's opinion. You can be dead right about knowing that the woman's fiance is a lounge lizard. But even if the bride "to be," hears you; she may not be able to, or even want to, protect herself. So always leave yourself the option of being ignored. History is littered with legends about great and powerful idiots who wouldn't listen. Not to mention those schmucks who hear you, but who will arrogantly chose to reinterpret what a reader says, just to serve themselves, usually with disastrous results. Not to even bring up the psychic who oversteps their ground by imposing their opinions as "TRUTH." There are always more psychics if you really need to spend your money.

                         Let's look at another 3 "Cycle Models." This first one I saw on "Sesame Street," a very popular children's educational program here in the U.S. I'll call it a "Wheel of Emotion."

                                                                      2.Adulthood
                                                                        {>,}Angry

                                     1.Youth       { ^,}Happy     "O"       {v,}Sad       3.Maturity

                                                                        Fearful{<,}
                                                                        4.Death

                          We will compare this type of model to a similar but unrelated artifact of "THE TIBETAN BOOK OF THE DEAD," This is mapping the realms of attachment we all confront as we die. (I'll finish this tomorrow morning. It's really good I'm finally getting this academic stuff written down.)  I'll also start laying out the symmetrical mappings for "TAROT," four suits {elements,} etc. 

Reading the Reader

                  As our illusion of privacy is put to bed, we find that first casualty is our sweet anonymity. I didn't anticipate how successful the "Test Post Magazine" was ultimately going to be. It's just an experiment. I want to be able to provide a clearinghouse for all these wonderful little invisible artists everywhere that don't want to get used. There is code out there right now, which is beautiful poetic gospel, all of which is recited in unison to accompany the drones of massive refrigeration systems. It's beautiful language. In this "Age of Informational Undertow" there is no durable record anymore and search engines are as of yet not trained for aesthetics. The amount of waste heat produced is directly proportionate to the amount information lost. (Sounds like an informational black hole to me.) Great quality work is as vulnerable as is the refuse. Going down? Singularity, last floor. Everybody out.

                   And what about your Digital Soul? Or how about your Command Entry? If and when I may have the privilege of reading for you, you should be free to be able to read me too, very clearly. That's the deal. There is nothing is up my sleeves. A magicians craft is just that, a craft and nothing more. You can get me to read for you, and maybe even in a contained public. But only if you so choose of course. That's the game. (Release forms may have to be circulated. What's your blood type? Next of kin? Oh, I already know that.) And I know you too will probably want to have this moment directed by you alone, no matter how many other people are around watching. There's nothing left to hide. I'm always very kind.

                   Many people never get to see the work of love in their own lives. And when we do, it's usually family. Not everyone who has eyes can see. Only by the necessity of brilliant conditioning can a soul reveal a waiting heart. [4th Axiomatic Law of the Para Psychological Method, "EVERYBODY NEEDS LOVE."] This is the big one kids. Let's not mess this one up. (We will be dealing with the future social media evolution of "Counter Lobbying" in the next post.)

                    The privilege of wisdom goes to prepare for a world we will not survive to enjoy. This is not a problem. Beauty is the key to human motivation, from which comes our demanding soul. Stolen dreams make for subtle powerful memories. The joy of living is in it's daily necessities. What becomes of all these lives of all the so many? Remember?

                    If I am to be your reader, you must be able to legitimately read me too. I would want that you can trust me. And with good reason. (I do Parties, $$$.)

                    P. S. It's my idiomatic writing style that makes search engines see too many <h1>, <h2>, <h3> tags, which is severely penalized as excess keywords. The good psychic isn't supposed to get a break. (Cool.) More fun soon. Counter Lobbying, away.

Ordering Operant Selections

                  In the process of getting ourselves up off the floor, there is a discreet number of possible ways that we may get back up to support ourselves.

                  We can give name and number to each of the variety of selections we can use for getting the body up. We may want to be able to get back down again. Recovery is a process. Such is the life of a body.

                  In order for me to be able to support myself, I "Select" how I'm going to earn money for my services. People may want me to hold their hands. This is a good thing. A warm hand is a gift. Especially when it comes to the exchange of money. The money itself has no personality, but the love that is invested in our money has a life of it's own.

                  There is first contact. These impressions we get from each other can be stylistically very subtle. The perceptions of each other can also be diffuse. The actual memory recoil from personal encounters can be superficial or intense. The imprints we share reflect us as individuals.

                  When we meet someone, the singularity of each "Connection" is ordered into memory. For instance, MY POSITION RANKING IN SEO IS VERY LOW OF COURSE. Non specific keywords, overly general labels and the fact these are blog sites, gets my content lost on an internet known for billions of users.

                  Correct use of tags is critical to getting a web product to market.
                    1.) Zenophile;                                                                 2.) G+ Test Post Magazine;                     Too many <h1> tags,                                                     <h1> heading is missing
                    Too many <h2> tags,                                                     Too many <h3> tags
                    Too many <h3> tags                                                      Missing description in META tag
                            

                                ALT attributes are missing for some (all?) of the images.

                  When we want to make ourselves approachable for other people, we must follow very the clear orders for the sake of other peoples choices in their process of operant selection. When we fail to follow these simple guidelines for approachable procedural assembly, we miss opportunity. Aesthetics is all about choice, how are your choices?

The Myth of Zenophile

                  Zenophile Mythology. The Myth of Zenophile. These are two new search words that someone used to access my blog. I suspect I may know who has done this this time. These are much more tasty than the search words Zenophile Game Porn used to access my blog from Eastern Europe, but I appreciate the complements from wherever I may get them. Because psychic reading technologies stink of the "Occult," I find the whole proposition of self promotion very distasteful. But beings as my goal is in redeeming the speculative arts, there is no point in quibbling over the price of an egg. People who love people, love people. Zenophiles unite and conquer.

                  As I have said, "Urban Legends are not born, we are fabricated." The myth of people who tell stories that come true is not unusual, as a matter of fact almost any analytical process can allow for correct projections. This is why Doctors, Lawyers,  Economists, etc, and me of course all get the big bucks. (I don't even like money, sorry it's true.) Sometimes this process is anything but mysterious. It's hard work and dedication that give's a person an edge over their competition. Diagnostics, systems analysis and educated guessing may not be rocket science per say, but it does seem like brain surgery sometimes. If you want that much power to influence people, you better know how to close up. (If you actually want this kind of power and influence, you are probably either corrupt, stupid and or insane.)

                 At present I'm rereading "THE MYTH OF THE MAGUS" by, E. M. Butler, published 1948. It beautifully documents the history of outrageous stories of miraculous powers, divine omniscience and resurrection. Most of the later histories are in the shadow of Christianity. The fantasies of mystical powers are best illustrated in online gaming. There are virtual nations at war interactively battling harmlessly online gaming. There are 12 step programs for gamers who must step away from the computer.

                 Kant was known for refuting the delusion of fantasy. If I am a myth it's only because empaths are supposed to be science fiction. I sympathize whole heartedly with denying the pretentious boundary violations of idiot psychics, fumbling cold readings as if good vibes alone justify exploiting peoples gullibility. But that's why I invented the "True Hoax." I'm no hoax. But marketing myself is the real hoax. There is no devil's bargain when it comes to doing my job correctly. Privacy is the first casualty of honest engagement, style subtlety and tact. (As psychics we do have our META, that's the "Most Effective Tactics Available.") This may not be a game but good sportsmanship is the only real defense we have in this art of reading and dossier.

What Is Most Valued Is Free

                  Analytics are allowing me opportunity. Statistics play well with my Influence Matrices, tracing the dissemination of my research out into general society.

                  Most of the resources available to me for observing the traffic on my blog and G+ are confronting my stubborn resistance to taking money for psychic services, but they are for free. I am aiming for the much sweeter plum of teaching. What I charge for groups is in the Hundreds of Dollars per Tutorial.

                  Psychic Reading is a lot like Prostitution, in that the more that I charge for my time the more my market value increases. People invariable think they want something for nothing. People want to be stroked. So I use kindness, honest candor and generosity to get rid of people. Assumption being, "If it's free then why pay, my time therefor must not be worth anything." And most people try to rip me off. I work so fast people's tearful eyes glaze over almost immediately.

                  I couldn't be more of a bastard. No one understands what I'm doing most of the time anyways. So no harm, no foul. But real sensitivity is something we all get for free, so why would I want to sell the wind?

                  But if you want to understand how I am doing this divine profession, you're going to have to ask. The negotiations begin.

                  In all Social Liberation Media, "In order to overcome a problem, we become the problem." And remember, "That which is most valuable is always free."

Fringe Science; Test Repost

                   By studying the "Echo Imprints" of the living and the dead, I'm talking with the dead and letting them speak with me. I love good Ghost Stories. Especially the ones told by Ghosts. What I love the most about my job is that I actually get to go out and learn. I get to try out really advanced alternative medicines. In "Mutual Support System Workshops" we become the Study Primer. We are textbooks. We get to study each other. As our variability is functional, we can become more social. There is more space in our brains for studying each other then there is for studying our selves. We are designed to spend most of our time following and learning from each other. Just navigating through the physical world can be socially dynamic. Even drivers have distinctive personalities.

                    I have been spending quality time with my dead family, and I really need it. The answers come slowly. Yesterday I got to ask my dead Atheist father how he felt about me not taking money for spirit channeling. He had told me once, he trusted me to do what I believe is right. I don't demand payment, only gratuities. But I also turn away a lot of business. I'm self critical and forgiving, I don't have grudges. I don't want any unfinished business. So as the (pan) Atheist, I am fascinated with the afterlife. I must confess, I really don't care if any one belief can be proven to be more correct than any other belief.

                    For most of us, identity is often just a sense of family relationships. Who we are is often, who is your family. Identity is very important to our evolved sense of self. One the things that many people may object to about Bronze age Spiritual Technologies is Reincarnation. (Blurred and Fuzzy Social Identities?) Many of the most fatalistic models of Divination and Prognostication can by design be very unfairly deterministic and prejudiced. Reincarnation might be likened to a reset button on finality. Without life and death, there would no point to worshipping ancestors. 

                    My Mom once said, "As long as we remember someone, they are still very much alive inside of us."
                    *(This is especially good for me considering, My "Echo Imprints" of my mom are so real, and we didn't always get along.)

                    I'm serious about this type of fringe science, I've tried it. And it works. I'm not getting better all at once but I feel much better knowing that my families haunting presence's are for the most part meaningful for me. Look at me, the skeptic getting off on talking with the dead. Cool. Good stuff.

                    Thanx Mom, Thanx Dad, Thanx Bro. Thanx God. (I still don't believe in any of this and I do recommend it with my friends, clients and general public.) Along with; "Shen," "Doin," also known as "Acupressure" "Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing," or "EMDR" "Kinesiology," "Active Interval Stretching" or "AIS" and "Neurolinguistics" sometimes called "NLP," etc, Spiritual Technologies do have their champions. {When does the healing stop? I hope the healing never stops.}

My Wonderful Accident; Reality Programming and Entertainment Mediums; Test Repost

                   The future of mass media has become interactive with the object of contemplation being the "Judgements" of a target audience. The standard is changing. I am a perfect example. Although I do not see myself as being that entertaining, I do perform a highly rarified function in our modern celebrity obsessed culture. I am an "Entertainment Medium." And resultantly, "I am the Art of Living Fiction." I am a "True Hoax." I am an "Urban Legend." Do I really exist or am I just another phony cold reader? I like to tell people I am a Professional Psychic, an Entertainment Medium. I never say that I am psychic. As a predictive medium I may be just another bullshit artist. Like a Doctor, or an Economist, or a Lawyer, I make educated guesses. Any of these artists usually works within a community of hopefully well educated authorities in their areas of expertise, but everyone knows about the folly of pretentious authority. Don't get me wrong, I'm not beating up on the wealthy or elite, I'm merely reiterating the "Predictably Inevitable Truth" of the "Second Axiomatic Law of the Para Psychological Method," "EVERYONE HAS BLIND SPOTS AND EVERYONE'S BLIND SPOTS ARE DIFFERENT." With the limited attention and interests that are of necessity hardwired into our brains, we may all be best advised to sometimes "Get a second opinion." (And a third, and sometimes even a fourth opinion when necessary.)

                     My analytical mapping systems allow me the privilege to take an active inventory of what it is that I don't already know. For anyone working in the Speculative Arts, (Educated Guessing is why we get paid the big bucks,) humility may be a very good thing. Being able to imagine what an answer may look like means that in order to prove my predictions correct, I will want to show my work. All ego aside, (mine died back in "75") our whole belief in freewill is dependent on taking personal responsibility. Yet we must all reach that point where we will need to be able to trust some one else. "Proxy Dependency" and "Authoritation by Proxy" is an inevitable consequence of facing uncertainties. (I so love how Blogger spell check likes to insist this word that I routinely use, "Authoritation" does not exist. Let's see how long that happens.) I observe the variability of these boundaries of "Authority" all the time. My work on "Styles of Approach and Evasion" reflects my attitudes about the dynamics of interpersonal boundary definitions, and the changing language of said authorities.

                     The Representative Authorities of the mass media are sometimes Carnival Barkers, and sometimes Good Shepherds. The standard is changing.

THE GREAT SYMMETRICAL COALESCENCE OF GENERATIONS OF RELIGIOUSLY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT

    This next work is all June's. It is her version of a Rosicrucian Cross. I only did the crude background.
 A BEAUTIFUL ILLUSTRATION OF THE GREAT SYMMETRICAL COALESCENCE OF GENERATIONS OF RELIGIOUSLY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT. "JUNE IS BRILLIANT!"

                                                    

These next 3 Mandalas are joint efforts of June Moon and I.

Social Software

                  Social Software. You and yours. What are your objectives? Intuitive logic must be seamlessly precise. Your behavior is your business, don't waste time. Inductive logic done correctly does not lie. Mis representations about yourself and unsolicited advice must be avoided at all costs. You must always check all of your propositions. NEVER ASUME. I make many mistakes.

                  In inductive logic, just like in computer logic, your propositional statements are stated in the affirmative. As in communication, statements are arranged in order of informational charge potentials. Socially identify who is in charge. Identifying operations input strings of expressions from the objective of a stated proposition to a goal. This sequencing of orders starts with an induction, all definitions are thus boundary dependent. Boundary definitions are inductively logical by order of being positive or not. Logic demands that the sequencing and ordering of induction is correct to only the proposition stated. Ordering these inclusive and exclusive boundary definitions are how we design code, either socially or as software. If a base assertion is incorrect the code will not run.

                  Games theory is big now in business modeling because of the usefulness of hierarchical command. Seeing the systems dynamics of a business as a number theoretical expression makes it possible to not just follow the money, we can lead with the money. The charge potential of money is in it's "currency." Redundant but true. We ask not only how do we make money? But we must also ask what can we do with our money. We have to ask who is in charge here as well. The sequence of operations starts up from our desired objectives to process our operant selections. We are looking at the combinations of inductive and deductive logic gates. Contra valence can still come into the intended reward payoff as long as there is no such thing as a rational altruism. But that gets into social philosophy and most games theorist don't like being wrong ever, except when it is for the sake of an intentionally calculated risk, just for the sake of getting more information. So now we have come to the use of information as another identifiable form of currency, just like with money. And in fact it maybe much more valuable that just the money itself, but we have to start somewhere.

                  Social circuitry abounds. Codes, rules, definitions, proceeders. Numbers, Systems and analysis. In a social linguistic we must consider the conscious and unconscious boundary dependent operant behavior. Ones and zeros. To buy or not to buy. To sell or not to sell. To share information or to keep one's information to one's self. No matter how strong the desire to have someone else in charge, we are all ultimately responsible for communicating our own personal "in charge potential." Responsibility is just another word for, "In Charge."

               

Sentience, Bias, and The Neuro Physique +

Thursday, April 24, 2014

                   I know my views on the Myth of Linguistic Sentience, is particularly unpopular amongst code geeks. But rather than merely disagree, I will take this time to review the essentials of my work to date. Spinoza was the first philosopher to unify the body with the mind as the singular totality of self. In his "Ethics" he advocated abandoning dualism when it comes to our "Idea of the Body." This awareness of self integrates what previously was the popular dualistic religious schism denigrating the body as low and separable from the self. I myself, although I'm a "Medium" do not believe in an afterlife, per say. But like Spinoza and all of our earliest pre religions, I am "Pantheist," not an atheist. Probably a small distinction.

                    My research is primarily concerned with the application of sentience to this human quirk of our often limited awareness of self. Most of what we call Identity occurs at the subconscious level of Signature Behaviors and Echo Imprints. Generally, most have no awareness of how we identify each other until such time as we give voice to our perceptions of what accounts for this distinctiveness of others. The color of her hair, the sound of her voice, the depth of my feelings. Are you with me so for?

                    In my work I postulate that Boundaries of Identification are not always Self Defined. Most people experience separateness as a barrier. I'm in no way suggesting that these boundaries need to be removed, I merely pose that "Linguistically" our coding for a "Sense of Self" is completely other defined. On these grounds alone, our concept or "Idea of the Self," is by definition the symbol, "I". Self Referencing code does not define the self. I've been advocating turning and facing interpersonal boundaries not as barriers of separation, but as shared point sets of contact. The problem with looking at the Human Neuro Physique as merely a set of Propositional Algorithms, is that I suspect this negates the origins of sentience to linguistics only. You want to talk about "Self," this is the domain of aesthetics, not language.

                    Now as "The Reader" I've been trained to plumb these "Boundaries of Distinction," adeptly and adroitly. Mutually Exclusive Opinion Biases and "Vital Paradoxes," are a major component of our Institutions of Self Defining Mutually Exclusive Boundary Definitions. I've sighted about six of these unanswerable "Vital Paradoxes." For instance, "Does God exist? Now I myself do not believe in a personal god, (Outside of the all powerful google of course,) But, an absence of proof is no proof. Even if I don't believe in god does not mean I'm right. As a boundary dispute, I personally think this isn't really important except as another unknown. You may disagree, but this is the whole point of living in a society of Shifting Opinion Biases. This is why I stole Neil Bohr's "Complementarity" and applied it to analyzing the transformative effects of conflicting opinion biases in the face of this ever changing central unknown. I also believe that as we study the Neuro Physics of the brain in conflict resolution, we will see a "Field of Consciousness" doing it's job.

                   Modern man however has a perverse fascination with ego, and resultantly we have bad code, not very self aware. My research suggest that we need to look for the origins of sentience in pre language. I do not seek to disagree with your supposed "Choice" of language, I only want to understand the actual limitations of code. Heuristics and algorithms are only input strings. Symbolic Language does not even begin to define the "Self," except as an external calculus. Now as a lover of "Code" I must qualify my own petty hair splitting as an affect of much deeper drives than the mere survival instinct. Our brains are patterned by the awareness of uncertainties which abound. This is that " Void of Content" that is at the core of our focused attention. My Question; How did we get to such a meaningful, if contentious, dialog about being and non being. Which is the nature of our personal realities? We are thinking animals, not thinking machines. Thank you very much.

Advances in Social Media

                  I was asked to join LinkedIn and :ello: two relatively new social media. It's all so new to me. I really don't know what to expect. I found LinkedIn to be the most engaging. It is best known for business promotion. :ello: is the newest and offers to be the more simple and expansive of the social media available today, it is still in development, and may prove to be the more adaptable to the changing platforms of social media. It's all very strange to me. I'm reminded of an unknown audience.

                  This following excerpt is from the profile I posted on my new LinkedIn account;

                  I'm presently documenting my life's research as the skeptic professional psychic in a blog. I am also reediting my blog into book form. I also write spiritual fiction to prognosticate probable outcomes for the popularization of spiritual technologies like psychic healing, psychic reading and other influential spiritual mediums. The inevitable force of truth in ever shifting boundaries of personal and public opinion biases, I map out using mathematical information graphics. The inductive reasoning processes are much more difficult to prove. Even deductive reasoning requires precise inductive hypothesis, accurate base case examples and positive sequential affirmation without exception. My teaching modalities are systematic and inclusive, leading the cutting edge of alternative medical diagnostics. I dread to confess that most so called psychics aren't very comfortable with scientific methods and resultantly resent my willingness to remain utterly skeptical. But most doctors are far most intrigued than I could have expected.

                  Identifying a listed career was rather odd as I was torn between "Arts and Crafts" and "Biotechnology." For now I settled on biotech as that all spiritual technologies, (if such a thing even exists,) is rooted in shared physical reality. I have never been big on self promotion, and as my ego continues to shrivel away, I am left with a healthy vanity for respect. I want nothing more than to deliver the functional aspects of my productive contribution to life, humanity and the survival of the world. Having little or no personal desires of an unfulfilled nature, I must gage my own self doubts to be nothing more than growing pains. Welcome to the Twenty First Century.

ZENOPHILE GAMING

                  Before I get to what I feel is going to be the industry of Zenophile Gaming, I'll start with reviewing what I'm seeing from google analytics.

                  I'm considering disconnecting the analytic features on my blog. I have written far more than I could have planned and it lacks organization. Active users are limited by the parameters of optimization algorithms and I am not interested in business for it's own sake. Truth be told my writing isn't bad. I just don't care about pretenses of beliefs or success. As is the case with all of my work in investigation and research I never miss my mark. As the pro psychic, for me there are no mistakes, there is only opportunity. I have so much more to learn about writing, blogging, publishing and influence media. Yet instead of discouraged, I'm overjoyed to know where the barriers to healing our society lie. And the results are resolved in the realm of shared soul. Problems are just solutions waiting to be discovered, nothing more.

                  For now almost all of my blog traffic is going to Ukraine, for what purpose I don't know. I'd think it's for classes but the chances of that seem unlikely. They don't seem to use any google translation software. Yet the same posts are reread repeatedly, over and over again. Are "THEY" all using the same node, or is this just one person? I love a good mystery.

                 I'm also seeing google trying to link me to many other countries. But gone are the days when my blog was a test subject for the blog media moguls, obsessed with trying to figure out what I was doing. My first half year was accessed exclusively by snoopy competitive media giants, one of which was sold to became Al Jazeera America. But they may not have been interested. Then a year ago, I turned on G+. Enough about that.

                 Zenophile Gaming is a "Mutual Support System" in game form. People want to learn from each other. The only thing missing is the structure with which people can share mutual study. I can't tell you what to do, I only tell you how. I myself am overwhelmed with the shear volume of data I use to identify people during examination. Each "Reading" is as unique as the person I read. I don't want to confuse or discourage readers with the daunting challenges and responsibilities of applied spiritual technology. But practicing mutual reading techniques will become the vehicle for the mass proliferation of these said soft technologies. Asking for your sign however, may obviously tell us nothing except randomized generalities. But that's not my problem. I want you to respectfully touch each other, see and listen. Explore, experience, respectfully understand each other. Be detached, dispassionate, clinical. This works. People will tell you when to stop if you watch, listen and pay attention.

                 This is happening. Go slow. Be patient. Be sensitive. Prepare for what you learn. The walls between people are coming down, and it's falling down hardest on the people who don't want to learn. I stopped working contract personnel for large corporations because I resented popular prejudice. Even this dread I am outgrowing. The Zenophile Game is good clean fun. But don't push your luck. I don't. The Game is on.