Online Social Media Revolution is a Confusion of Tongues.

            One of the ironies of our Online Social Media Revolution is revolting, a Confusion of Tongues.

            Not only can words mean different things one keystroke at a time, but certain people are often right for very wrong reasons. One person’s anarchy is another person’s big business. There is a difference between the pretense of logical rhetoric and a mutually supportive dialog. There is also a big difference between making points, and pointed arguments designed to make yourself look important. Temperament is the “X” factor in this filtered data-glut we call social media. Our game is mutually interactive. Therefor personal responsibility falls to the participant. Vulnerability for the online offender is in their total dependence on the passive audience’s participation. Their self-serving logic and parsimoniousness are Broken Records, playing Mantras of Tyranny.

            However, we can choose to moderate, block, or simply not respond. The offender loses interest by wasting their words. The amount of energy wasted playing the victim is inverse to the degree to which others can understand or empathize with said grievances. Without this commonality of a shared issue, the perfect persecutee falls back on the prosecution of the disinterested. So much of what people put on the internet does not provide resources for action but merely reinforces alienation. I feel bad for those people who don’t recognize that this is an ongoing experiment. The results to date are not final.

Here's my exorcism for the blight of self-doubt and gullibility, which I feel comes from traumatic memory.

We often have to ask hard questions like, "Am I deluding myself with distorted false memories?" My life was cluttered with bad karma. My spiritual and political life was confused, and therefore unimportant. The issue of implanted or false memories was being exploited and abused by common and confusing social issues. Maybe, you too have had those common sacred wounds that must bring us back out of ourselves. Everyone has hardships, some much worse than others. But, who do we believe? We all have to ask that question. Beliefs, of and by themselves, can reflect a very low level of consciousness. But by having the faith to persist into the depths of verification takes learning to the level of soul healing. I highly recommend that we all learn to find proof for our own perceptions of memory.

Alien Artifacts, Math Graphics Anomalies and Accidental Demonstration Models Behaving Badly

Aliasing in higher order wave space.

This works in pacifict.com

Aliasing also looks a lot like X-Ray Crystallography and Electron Microscopy

The Pressures Toward Global Materialistic Avarice in the 21st Century

                    :The question arises, "How do people deceive themselves so well as to convince, marginalize and materially exploit others?" In this age of "The Pandering Bourgeoisie," people are bred to consume wastefully, I too covet sometimes, pointlessly. Billionaires, Monarchs, and authoritarians are always the most aggressively subservient people, enslaved by their wealth, delusions of power, and their hostile pretenses of absolute control. All of the world's best research is now subsumed under the agendas of paranoid business departments.

                    I used to love the Beatitudes until I read the part about giving your life for Jesus. Martyrs do make good cornerstones for religions. But does submission to God also require passivity under the force of oppression? "Blessed are the meek, Blessed are the poor," Blessed are the insipid. (Is this a recipe for breeding human sheep? I love Jesus, not martyrdom.) Materialism is enhanced by enforced self denial. Self pity and self sacrifice can make anyone cruel and unfeeling. (What's sacrificed is the love of an unfeeling Father.) Affluence Ministries appeal to our self pity. Addictions to money are the hardest Jones to break.

                    I myself refuse to worship a god who would punish innocent children for straying and refusing to believe. If god is a such a jealous bully, no wonder he needs the devil to seduce innocent non believers. If believing in god means we are to judge the children of strangers to be damned by birth, why believe in anything at all? Ever? Thus our faiths have led us to the temptations of avarice. Our faith has made us martyrs to the dollar. I'd rather starve, and I have.

I'm reading a fascinating book by David Weinberger called "TOO BIG TO KNOW." It's about the failure of hierarchical authorities in a data driven society. A.K.A. Clerical abuse. Today's social information networks debate all the available knowledge. But the old long form authors (of which I tend to follow) are still with us. We now also get the constant noise of antagonistic dialogs through arrogant online discussion.

The Talmud for me is the old form text with an evolving open record. Wikipedia is also an example of a group moderated knowledge compendium. I would say if you want to look at uncontested knowledge like Euclid's "ELEMENTS" or Newton's "PRINCIPIA," we see both are enhanced by contemporary analysis producing ever more refined and precise corrections. No final authority is needed to close the book or codify correct conduct.

The clerical academics of most philosophies and religions are often bullshit. Not to say that these works are always wrong per say. It's just that most of what was written was early and often inaccurate. When we look at many the arguments surrounding conflicting worldviews, we often get lost in semantics. The greater challenge becomes, "Knowing when we're wrong, and finding out what to do when we are wrong."

Declarative intentional learning is hopefully adaptive. "Authoritative Knowledge," however, is enforced. Parroting scripted messaging often induces silent withdrawal. But this may be the only sign a person will show, of receptivity. Even these brief moments of subjective awareness can be so subtle, that the person spouting half truths can suddenly relapse back into denials and evasions. (Here's a case tautology: My own, "Money is the hardest addiction to break." Even if it is true, where's my evidence and am I just being preachy?)

I write extensively on recuperative deprogramming. I will continue to post more articles from my book on this subject.

Why I won't try to replace G+

                 
                    G+ spoiled me. I started as a blogger on an indispensable throw away issue, the Psychic's consultants ethics. What if they aren't always insane, corrupt or ignorant. The obvious correlations with religion and politics have been a hard sell.

                    Starting to write my book "ZENOPHILE," on Blogger meant only the blog & media giants cared about my unique and provocative content. When I started on G+ I linked to Google Analytics and YouTube with my Math Movie Graphics. This opened up a floodgate of engagement that only my multi-tiered outreach could have achieved. I tried writing about my rarefied interests in for instance, Google image decompression algorithms testing out their image recognition software on my math art.

                     Not to mention the Russian Porn Mafia whose original interests were prompted by my admitted use of their applied Games Theory approach to intimacy and dating compatibility. I use a very elaborate system of checklists identifying distinguishing markings and variations of distinctions.

                     Long and short of it is, just like G+, mine too was an experiment that went horribly, horribly right. And no one will likely ever got to see it. I'm not that disappointed. My whole life has been thus both extremely successful and outwardly pointless. The G+ experiment made it possible for me to limit the noise of engagement, which I deliberately avoid. I devised a strategy of Creative Personalization where I let advertising tell me what GOOGLE can see of my extremely limited inroads into the internet. Less data about  me is qualifiedly more. No email. No commerce. No google searches ever. No YouTube except for music. The amount of the revealing info into the Google personalization profiling algorithms, is used to target potential markets. This foe me was an endless gold mine for reverse surveillance, profiling the profilers.

                     But the end came much too early, with the rollout of G+beta. No more tasty unique advertising prompting from my interests.  One last sudden upswing in engagement was coming through the Porn Mafia until the election. Now my ads on YOUTUBE are predictably pedestrian, as they should have always been. But even back then I was still getting people coming through the porn dating sites from Czech armaments dealers, Russian book clubs, Turkish Hacking conglomerates, Ukrainian hunting clubs, Japanese code designers, etc, etc. I couldn't have made this stuff up.

                     I do like being able to find things that most people will never get to see, much less want to know about. Having had so many careers where I simply have too much self respect to want to pander or proselytize, I appreciate the need to just let go and move on to something else often unrelated. With the closing of G+beta, I'll miss the few people I've actually been able to learn from and their informative posts on my G+ Home Page.

                     This is the unsigned Painting. It not what you get, but it's what you give yourself. Dearest Dr. Ed. You once said to me that, "It's very hard to connect with people over the web. Full stop. The new beginning is here. When I have been advised to create my own new online "Community" to identify and address this apparent gap in perceived social connectivity, I confess I prefer to accept the successes and failings of my social experiments as part of a much larger learning curve. To where and when, I don't know. (I can't say, "We'll see." That's the Don Bot's elastic slogan.)

Constructive Social Experimentation Campaigns Via The Internet?

                        We are now creating new all inclusive Super Cultures that can heal our society. Finding real solutions to our worlds problems is conceptual propagation of the first order. We must learn to give space to these times for finding new possibilities. Crisis equals Opportunity. We're not going back to the way things were. The problem becomes, "Will we be able to apprehend the changes we need to make now, in order to keep up with protecting the vulnerable future?"

                        I still suspect that the media and internet are the very thing that brought us to this daunting and precipitous hazard of mass indoctrination. The Net will now become our mouthpiece for mass recovery. We will have to compete with junk infotainment industries for entertainment bandwidth. Obviously a low overhead is one of the only real advantages any bottom up social movements have in this kind of asymmetrical social welfare education process.

                        Can we design online engagement campaigns for the mass recovery? My experiments on informational dispersal have proved little of value that I can disseminate by myself alone. However, by using G+ Classic I got a huge following for my XENOPHILIA Collection complete with lots of Google Analytics data supporting my Propositional Assertions about data dispersion rates. But the time sensitive nature of my publishing online during the constant waste information undertow, guarantied me a viral mass ceiling of irrelevancy that is almost entirely impermeable. The expectation is now all online interests are financial driven only. And thus without having a revenue of available cash flow paying for Adwords advertising, my page ranking with the S. E. O.'s put me and the general public irretrievably hidden beneath the behemoth of Mega Scale Business Economics and the unfolding dirty politics.

                        It seems to be we must learn to fight dirty while avoiding getting dragged through the litigious mud. Radical Liberation does offers us Universal Maternity for every mom's children and their human rights. The Church of the Great Mother might be a good place to start. {MOMISM?} Scientology had adopted a lot of goofy stuff to qualify as a church. Some of which became gospel. We might not have to go quite so crazy. Adopting a faith of principles without dogma might still qualify us for tax exemption. There is however always the problem of groups with their exclusive self defining boundary definitions bonding people on the lowest of low common denominators. Skip this next section if you aren't interested in the clerical book keeping in church doctrine.

                       (We almost have to define membership along number theoretical guidelines. Namely we become enumerated by existential quantifiers as opposed to absolute quantifiers. For a member to exist, one must not be defined by an absolute quantifying generality. We are mutual subjects, not mere objects to be defined as separate and then counted as members. The clerical implications of membership are of course still group theoretical.)

                        Numbers aside, associations between inclusive group identities leaves us open to many possibilities which in fact completely overlap and are identical. Instead of contra variants that cancel each other out, overlapping elements of interest supersede popular prejudices. For instance a lot of us non believers are getting tired of getting stereotyped as unsupportive to other peoples faiths and have stopped calling ourselves Atheists. Similarly many of us have also abandoned the pretenses of purity that often have blighted our otherwise appropriate political uprisings.

                         Again I don't have the answers. But I can suggest asking, "What do the answers most likely look like." Keep experimenting people, we're going to get this right somehow. In this, I think there is considerable agreement among many many divergent thinkers.

Para Psychology and the Politics of the Occult, Why People Love Fake News

             When you believe in things you don't understand, you suffer. Superstition is the way."
                                                             STEVIE WONDER

                      Everyone loves a good drama. But the antagonist is never the true heavy, quite the opposite. We give the burden of heavy lifting to the innocent. Yet without that pretentious promise of evil, "What is the meaning of life?" Why should I care about the trials of the innocent? That god sent "Good" Devil is a very sacred thing indeed. But it took the industries of sex, drugs and rock and roll to bring him home again. A veteran of Heavenly War we all love his grizzly reports of why, "At least our boys didn't die in vain." And he and his stories are especially welcome in those homes where god still rules.

                       "What's your sign?" (Do you think I care? I don't.) Evil is a pop icon. Evil said, "I am an Original Sinner" and then resultantly blundered into office. Only problem is that, "It's" all going to it's head now. And all Icons are designed to pop. Not if the end will come, but only when. The candidate of the boredom party has a stupefaction platform. And an expiration date for when that lying ignorant milk goes bad. (Tick Tick. Is that your picture on the carton?) Irony being, Pink Elephants have already become so enamored by the whiff of evil, we now get to see delirium tremens staggering through the house of lords. god need no introduction, conspicuous only be his glaring absence. BELIEVE. Belief is our yoke of subservience and our superstitions are just a medal of valor for predictably dying on schedule. We deceive to believe. Once we buy into the tyranny of boredom and ignorance we must say goodbye to ourselves, each other and to common sense in general.

                       Now I know that if you are reading this, I'm probably just preaching to the choir. (Can I get an Amen.) I myself haven't given up on the fringe explorations, far from it. But as a very greedy consumer of usable information, I don't like buying lies. You ask, (I just read your mind) what does any of this have to do with Para Psychology? It doesn't. Other than of course for all the lies and misrepresentations that are used to keep people from using healthy rational imagination modeling for potentially predictable events. Now the model is not the territory mind you, but try telling that to your Astrologer before they are ready to hear it. I love my friends who still study the planets. But think of how it may be that this is one of the only things you in fact may share in common with your supposed enemies. Even metaphorical beliefs can sometimes transcend conceptual barriers of alienation. {Authors Message}