Sensitive Emotional Boundaries and Intuitive Aprehension

             I started cataloging essential concepts needed to take good directions. Just applying a biometric to so called sensitivities, doesn't hold any water until it's backed up with recordable variabilities for analysis with the available statistical modeling. {Much more on the Heuristics of Personalization Profiling later.} Technique wise, I'm identifying distinguishing qualities. We provide information generated by amusing curiosity and often a real need. I then point out, "I don't know what the answer is, but now let's look at what the answer(s) probably are going to be." This is usually revealing. I avoid portraying some pretentious authority, Gurus, and leaders in general, can often spiritually abuse.

          
            We'll have to start with being sensitive to people's; Personal Boundary Space.   Defining your own emotional boundaries and sensitivity can be critical to understanding others.  We must take responsibility for being aware of others feelings. We also need to be able to protect ourselves.  Being able to appreciate people as individuals is a unique virtue and a priceless gift. Being able to read people's mind for me is just a disturbing side effect of caring.  I love my job.  I just need to be really be careful.  Blah,  Blah,... Blah.  And so on.

            As "Sensitives,"  we so called "Psychics" also have to protect ourselves. So. Never lie, especially to yourself. All people have "BIAS  FEARS," Pro and Con, believers and disbelievers alike. (At parties, there is usually no shortage of guys who want to punch me out, and I sympathize with their disgust for psychics. Most readers are terrible readers and certainly not even vaguely psychic.) I really do prefer some healthy skepticism. I don't have to let my own personal biases get in the way. Telling you this weeds out the stragglers. I don't want unreceptive clients. I don't need people to agree with me. I prefer people with different opinions from mine.  In working with people, I don't like judging people or taking their inventory.
            
            Now as to the sensitive boundaries, this is where we find the real pros.   I'll demonstrate using some of my own personal biases and basic boundary issues;
                                    
            I've come to love looking at peoples hands.  Palms and Handwriting. I get to hold people's hands, thousands of them. I feel them. Everyone feels different to me.  I'll be using models to demonstrate the actual statistical mapping for variability, more later.

            This is a thousand times more sane than this sounds. I'm perfectly aware how different people feel about these issues. I always support different people in faith. And I love people for whatever they believe. I also do inductive massage touching and feeling others. Treating pain, grief and loss.  I have been loathed by psychics who say that I don't believe, and that I'm just doing it by the numbers. But I have enough faith to want to master my craft. DO THEY?

             I'm a very gifted reader.  But I don't believe in any of it at all. And I'm really good at it. Too good. And I don"t believe in any of it. But it works. I love reading. It's hard work.  I have pride. This exemplifies the practical absurdity of me being a self doubting psychic.  I have issues. And I feel it is more than disrespectful to dismiss any one's opinion, and it is not my place to criticize.
            
            I would very much like to make this not about me. I'm not complaining at all. Don't get me wrong. I actively experience life as a sensitive. I think it's good luck to be able to tell which voices are inside of me alone. I hear so much.  I totally buy into the pure magic.  What I get to do with people is not easily dismissed. This isn't about me. It never was. And I'd like to prove it.  Looking at peoples hands. Looking into their eyes. Listening to their voices. Touching your bodies. I read into the metaphorical stars.

            And by the way, another bias fear I have, I choose not to be attracted to people when it is not appropriate. I don't like sexual tension. "Intuitive Apprehension" and "Intuitive Tension" creates a boundary between self and others, a mirror of sorts. The "Mirror of Karma" as it is written in the "Tibetan Book of the Dead,"  is where all our good and evil deeds are reflected therein.  Attachments and payoffs do come with the disincentives of moral hazards.                       
            
            I myself am showing symptoms of a "Neutral Opinion Bias Fear"  I don't want to take sides.
The opinion biases between so called believers and non believers as detractors and advocates are actually about the same to me.  When it comes to psychics most people are at least a little skeptical, or at least we should be. Being sensitive about people's different faiths, beliefs and desires has made getting to see peoples hands easy and fun for me, rather than creating anxiety for me or for my many querent. People almost always like my readings very much. I make people very comfortable. But I must confess. I do have a strong Bias, but it is a neutral bias, based on experience and tact. 

             Let us proceed to the next most immediate sensory boundary, "Others?" How do we perceive others? We use our senses. People can either enjoy being read or it can be a violation. Let someone read you, you should have the choice, it should never be an abuse of power. {In a age of data mining and surveillance industries, we have pretty much lost the subtle sensitivity of privacy and diplomacy.}

             Usually some of the easiest people for me to read, are the dry stoics who think I'm deluded, corrupt and or dangerous. I not only support their distaste for fuzzy excuses for human interaction, but I also want proof. These usually men are very easy for me to understand. These people like to think there is no working in the subjective realm of personal awareness, largely because they think they can't be read. Fortunately people with thick emotional boundaries can also be very shrewd and perceptive, and are often unintentionally the best intuitive them self. They, (and maybe all of us) are always denying that there may indeed be something subtly important that they (or we) are not aware of. Question becomes, "How do we go into what you don't already know about, in following information being generated by your personal interest based curiosity or need alone?" {What does the hand say? No, seriously, I'm asking.}

               I don't believe in type casting, but I will be going over maps for analysis of variabilities and for the comparison of types and typologies.  Thank you for holding up on your end of the bargain.  I'm still learning, and this is proving to be far more usable than I could have ever hoped for. Re edited for clarity.