Solve et Coagula

                         Solve et Coagula is Latin for; to take apart and to put back together again. It is a famous alchemical formula. I use it here to highlight the complementary rational functions of the Meta Formally Logical processes, ENUMERATE PARTITION and SYMMETRICAL COALESCENCE. {Apr. 11th, 2013}  We are blessed with these two very complementary complex conjugates for intelligence. [Left Brain / Verbal / Deductive / Nominative / Particular] * [Right Brain / Non Verbal / Inductive / Cumulative / Gestalt] They work in seemingly dissimilar ways.

                        We will be looking at neuroanatomy, aesthetics and philosophy as we plumb the origins of human consciousness. The popular modern arguments tend to suggest that sentience is the exclusive domain of humans and language. "In the beginning there was the word." I, however, will be exploring the kinds of intelligences that are non verbal. And I would like to offer that maybe self awareness is not the same thing as linguistic self referencing. Were we to say that sentience is a purely rational process, then we could assert that the primacy of language is for identifying and indexing the ordering principles of self awareness. But if my research is correct, we may not be able to exclude the intuitive mind from this phenomena called self awareness or sentience. And I intend to demonstrate that the basic ordering principles of language and intelligence derived originally from aesthetics. Does the love of beauty not rise to consciousness until it is named? Or does our awareness emerge from somewhere much deeper, much earlier. Language maybe thought of as a very singularly human behavior. Or at least that's what many believe.

                         I feel these questions become most pertinent when we debate the intuitive. Because intuition is an inductive reasoning process it is either right or wrong. But as I have already said, intuitions are perfect for distinguishing that which is not yet known. There is a kind of unease we feel in the face of so much awe and uncertainty. I call it, "INTUITIVE APPREHENSION." Is not life amazing, all by itself? But how much more amazing is this awareness, with which we witness life? Let's take it apart and put it back together again.

                         In the same way people have asked; "What created God?" Or "Was there anything before the Big Bang?" And "Where did consciousness come from?" The first two questions I leave to theologians and astrophysicists. The third is an easier one to define because it maybe an emergent phenomena. If we can identify origins for language we are in the right area. If we look into human history, at the point we predate writing we call this "Prehistory." There are many oral traditions that predate written history.

                         There is a beautiful mythical beast called the "Worm Ouroboros." Like the snake that swallows it's own tail consumes its self, it is not unlike that mystery of this thing we call self. Self consuming, self sustaining, self destroying, sounds like consciousness. My teacher once said, "There are no higher or lower levels of awareness, there is only awareness." And we have that mysterious quotation from the Upanishads, "The self is ubiquitous." Awareness is a phenomena that defines itself, only exists within itself and has no limit other than itself. (Yawn!) This isn't helping.

                          Let's look outside our own language of human definitions. I'll try to answer each of these questions.
           
                          Do Dolphins, Elephants, Apes, Dogs, etc, have an actual language and or do they communicate without semantics? (Granted that formal semantics do involve the unit objects; Right, Left, Up, Down, Forward, Backward, Before, After, Inside, Outside.) Our perceptual ordinations are this meta formally logical extension of these simplest of all of the namable divisions in space and time. Bees use a little dance. They take instructions and give instructions to other Bees using directions and distance by the number of their waggles.

                          Do we define these people as being sentient and self aware; Autistics, Developmental Challenged, Narcissists, Ignorant, and so on? And if they are sentient and self aware, to what degree? Question is, how do we understand this actual awareness of self outside of the acquisition of language? Can we say that someone who has limited perceptions is less self aware?

                         Do we only experience remembering our earliest childhoods through the language and words we use to construct and retrieve memory? I don't even know if I'm asking this question in the right way. Can we experience remembering things before we have had the language to identify what we are recalling? Understanding can drive a clear path into and through memory, but the mind still wanders, (We forget. We can forget what we have remembered. If I know enough to look, I often can remember almost anything, but that seems to have been learned. I've always remembered subjective self awareness from very early infancy. Bottle feedings, diapers, the basinet, those little bathes in the sink.) What we remember is both intentional and unintentional. Do I remember all of this stuff only because I had read about remembering to remember it? Could I remember to remember without language? I may never know.

                        As we are getting to the evidentiary part of this exercise, we will be looking at the self contradictory nature of both self awareness and it's awkward language.

Checklists for Handwriting Analysis

                         Checklists for handwriting analysis are some of the most non finite of all the esoteric diagnostics. And yet because of the almost infinite combinations of all the systems of interpretation, the different characterizations for each letter are all too easy to forget. Hence, we need the intuitive eye. We have a descriptive language for many of the more general contrasting styles, but most of the individual attributions for each character have been forgotten. Let my start by saying that here in the United States, our Constitution was written in cursive by Thomas Jefferson. He had great penmanship. It has taken most of my life to learn to write legibly.

                         There was this practice of the attributions of signs, called the "Law of Signatures," This was done for the sake of expedience. This entailed corresponding identifying features with their associated similar objects. Metaphorically; She's a peach, He's a jerk, Or, we are stuck in a rut. We see this practice in mnemonics, (memorization). The "Law of Signatures" however was generally used to give names and attributions to herbs. Liverwort; Hepatica. Mandrake; Mandragora. We have also seen this practice applied to Palmistry; The Mystic Cross, a central intersection crossing the rising fate line with the transverse simian line, (Dominant Raja marking, {FIRE / ACTIVE}, it is not necessarily an indication of mysticism.) Jacob's Ladder, a series of lines extending across the Jupiter mound in succession from the upper mound of Mars toward the Saturn, Sun and Mercury fingers (supposedly indicative of an aspiring nature and social confidence).

                          Somewhat regrettably, this kind of interpretation by analogy has dominated the practice of handwriting analysis as well as many other unconnected popular superstitions. Let's look at a checklist for common interpretations and this will become obvious.
                          Line Quality:
                                               Fine and sensitive     or     Thick and heavy handed
                                               Stylish and ornamental     or     Blockish and architectural
                                               Rhythmic and coordinated     or     Dynamic and unordered
                                               Linear and connected     or     Aerated and spaced out
                                               Smooth and nerve steady     or     Jagged and jittery
                                               Rounded      or     Angular
                                               Flattened horizontally(Stringing), Secretive or Vertically, Narrow mind
                          Slant:
                                               Rightward / Extrovert / Impulsive
                                               Vertical / Ambivert / Even Tempered
                                               Leftward / Introvert / Restrained
                                               Alternately Rightward and then Leftward / Chameleon / Unpredictable
                          Baseline:
                                               Flat on the baseline, grounded and self supporting
                                               Below the baseline, depressed
                                               Above the baseline, spirited and ungrounded
                                               Wandering baseline, moody and not self supporting, thieving
                                               Writing upwardly toward upper right hand corner, Cheerful enthusiasm
                                               Downwardly toward the lower corner, Bumming out, Hitting bottom?
                                               Ascending and descending loops overlapping above or below other lines of writing; Connotes confusion, (Overlapping crowded writing looks confused.)

                          Size:
                                               Small, good concentration, pedantic, controled
                                               Large, drive, untaught
                                               No capitals or punctuation, no sense of self
                                               All capitals, chivalrous
                          Paging:
                                               Margin to margin, pragmatic
                                               Few words to a page, idealistic
                                               Crowds the page, utilitarian
                                               Few words to a page, Want words to have emphasis
                                               Everything clinging to the left side, Has difficulty finishing
                                               Writing up to the right edge, finishes hard
                                               Writes down the right side of the page when coming to the edge instead of just starting another line, Conquerer! (That's Me! {I am Napoleon!})

                         As with any diagnostic It is advisable to not get bogged down in assumptions. People often have reasons for their quirks. Sometimes a flourish is just a flourish.

Ergonomics Physiognomy and Biometrics

                         Today we will be looking at why organizing your data is at the core of Intuition. When we are looking at something as varied as people, rational analysis alone is just too slow. One of these most crucial forms of data analysis is statistics. Yet even as we are asked to follow well established procedures, we are often asked to make decisions.  These choices can very much effect the outcomes. We use multi variate statistics and the calculus of variation to compare and correlate distributions of variabilities.
                         1. Ergonomics: Do your clothes or furniture fit you?
                         2. Physiognomy: Have you ever seen your nose on someone else before?
                         3. Biometrics: Can your signature change so much as that your checks could be refused at your bank?
                         Probably no, Definitely no if look close enough, and Hopefully no not ever because for one thing no one looks at signatures anymore, in that order.

                         We have normative means or averages that usually are the most prevalent of the possible difference in say; 1. Our body size or shape, 2. Our distinguishing recognizable facial features, and 3. Our identifiable signatures.

                         In the "Normal" distribution, the average, or mean is usually thought of as that peak of the "Bell Curve." I prefer to think of that hump of normalcy, as the "slump" of predictability. As a sort of inescapable pit into which data, expectation and hopes fall in, never to be heard from or seen again. Marketing is often focused at optimization of market share. This means; if you are too big or too small, too pretty or too plain, or too neat or too messy, you are skewing the data. And you are going to be ignored as you are not an appreciable target consumer. You may be noticed as the exception however (Outlier), but only in terms of "Deviance."

                          Case in point, the algorithms that are designed to perform key word searches on my blog do nothing to identify the breadth of the issues and diverse subjects I use. Imagine searching for something as diverse as the kinds of non finite multi variate statistics I'm using everyday in my work as a psychic (Hands, Writing, Faces Voices, etc), as a massage therapists (Skin Tone, Muscle Density, Organ Placement, Subject Sensitivity Thresholds, etc), or as a profiler examining hand written job applications. I can assure you no man is going to be able to design a software code that is going to be able to keep up with this ever expanding wealth of knowledge, much less that ever widening "VOID Of CONTENT" that our preverbal intelligence is uncomfortably confronted with every day. Computers may store and process, but do they understand the choices we make to search for data. Not yet, Maybe not ever. Intuition as of now, is still at the core of even this, our fortunate lust for data.

                         I would like to reiterate to my brave readers, that as of yet I've heard of no other person who is successfully bridging the esoteric directly with science as an evolving history, at least not at the scope and the scale of these documents. And again thank you so much for your "Supervision."

Ack, A Ghost

                         Damn, I saw a ghost in my apartment. I'm going to have to put out traps. I don't want to have to go on anti seizure medication again. I thought I closed that door a long time ago. I'm supposed to be rational. I don't believe in ghosts any more than I believe in remote viewing or traveling faster than the speed of light. Ouch! I left the door open to let the air flow through and I turn around and the guy tries to head back out of the door before I see him. Look, I'm used to seeing the ancestors hanging around people. And my own relatives keep coming around and share my dream houses with me as if they never left. They rarely ever say anything. But damn. In my own home. When I'm awake. Damn.

                         As an Echo Imprint, this guy is just as distinctive to me as anyone I know. I think I know him. I didn't see him out of the corner of my eye, I saw him straight on. I think I remember him being a pleasant sort. I like to humble brag about why I'm never alone. But now that I've adjusted to the fact mom was right, I admit I'm trying to explain the unexplainable. He seemed pleasant enough, If I'm going to be seeing ghosts in my home I should appreciate that they don't want to be a bother.

                         Spiritualist will ask me if the souls I'm seeing are the dead who have yet to "Pass Over." I don't know and I don't care. I'm not sure that I'm not just having another temporal lobe seizure. I have been having the headaches again, I just have to cut back on the herbs and the protein, and I do feel a lot better. I seem to be in control. But I have been able to bliss out. I believe that the world is embracing me for the love and the dedication I'm am showing in my life, friendships and work. But time falls apart. I think I am somewhere in the future reporting back what is happening in the world. But then I realize I have been asleep and that none of this has happened yet. I don't know where this is going but I've already been there. It's how I've always known that we will get there and that the world wasn't going to come to an end. It hasn't.

Who Is Driving This Bus {Cynamics}

Added movie

This function is discretized into algebraic fields over very very large domains.

                        As this project is designed to demonstrate the generation and dissemination of information in the shifting cultures of opinions and bias, I'm trying to understand the dynamics of blogging. As is intrinsic to a "True Hoax," I'm offering factual information about creative influence and the intuitive will. Much of this work is cloaked in the language of psychic "Reading." I do this because of the fact that para psychology is colored by peoples conflicting personal biases. Yet as I have revealed much is just public culture, I am motivated by a desire to bring my life's work on the super normal to publication. I have to confess to being inexperienced. I look at the traffic sources that are sending my blog all over the world, and there is an obvious pattern. Supposedly keyword searches are being performed by companies that make money selling products, yet outside of the few people who are following me directly, no one knows what they are getting.

                        General advise coming from these companies is often based on real practical research. Yet I'm more than a little uncomfortable to see massive typographic errors, vague instructions, non cohesive information and poorly conceived guidance. What the heck. Location, location, location. Who do you have yourself linked to? What search engines are you promoting yourself through. And KEYWORDS, KEYWORDS, KEYWORDS. What! Is this a grant proposal?

                        I have already written, "Who Is The Spaminator, Aug 20th 2013" just to get rid of one traffic source that I just didn't appreciate. Technically this isn't just a blog, it's a document. More page hits do not translate into more "Readers." Question. Who is driving this bus. I've heard of machine learning. But machine teaching? Ghost in the machine, I call you "CYNAMIC"

The Intuitive Arts and Science

                         As we are coming to see, for all the rational objections there are to using intuitions, nothing is faster at identifying what is as of yet not known. Be it meeting someone for the first time, or mapping the universe at the scale of the very large or very small, we are designed to confront the unknown. Why? Those are the concerns of philosophers and theologians. How? Now that's my area of expertise. Maybe why is more important, but in this situation, knowing how we embrace and experience the unknown is somehow the gift of the intuitive awareness.

                         The obsession with symmetry and the invariance of structure under rotation or projection has been at the core of rational analysis. From the beginnings of history, we have focused down into today extending outwardly into futures yet to imagine. Just like the past light cones that focus into our eyes, the future is projected like a lighthouse illuminating the unknown.

                          The whole point of this literary exercise, has been to demonstrate and prove the inescapable truth of the intuitive awareness. This has been done by a series of hypothetical assertions. The application of said propositions has been a process of affirmation. I have avoided trying to reinvent the wheels of consciousness. But as the source materials will require closer reanalysis, the basic territories have been discussed, mapped and resultantly explored. The subtle sophistication of the history of the intuitive arts has been revealed to often be very limited and sometimes even completely wrong. But this does not negate the pristine truths that have irreversibly resulted from this pursuit of truth and knowledge. But man does not see it.

                          Mans greatest evil is the pretense of authority. When it is said to be the absolute truth, and it is NOT TRUE, this is the abuse of power. Speculation, Great. The deluded arrogance of false authority, not great, bad, wrong, evil. There are many of you who are going to object to much of what I have written. I have made little attempt to distinguish things like the difference between Tropical from Sidereal (Hindu) Astrology. I have also put little energy into the interpretations of palm markings. I've done nothing so far to look at the practice of handwriting analysis, yet. I have tried to give some insight into the fine art of chinese diagnostics and treatment, but this too I must say is lacking in detail. And yet as we are approaching the end of this document I am relieved to see that I still have work set out for me. My instincts and intuitions have so far served me very well. If precision is science then brevity is art.

TEST LINE FOR RETRIEVING UPDATES

More On Intuitive Touch {Re-edited for clarity}

                          Touch is the most information dense form of communication. Words and language are critical for understanding. But thats exactly where words fail us, as they are just too slow and ponderous and are not universal. We have to come to sharing languages that defines personal differences. Indexing by the valences of gender or bias, we are enjoying a renaissance of communication. People are now learning to better understand differences in linguistics and style. (Well, we can dream can't we.)

                          Identifying and respecting personal boundaries takes tact. Knowing or learning how to respectfully approach others is a matter of profound sensitivity. If and when we are actually touching each other, a whole new series of instincts and intuitions come into play. The standard ritual of shaking hands is a beautiful place to start. Open handed and firm or are you just given the fingers? I like to feel the whole hand. Skin firm and tight or is the hand soggy and mushy like mash potatoes? Many of the biggest most muscular guys have this characteristically self indulgent skin on their palms. Moist and sensitive or dry and callous? Do they pull back quickly or do they enjoy that moment of contact? As we will be having the time to be getting to massage therapy after all, we'll be able to work from the initial sensitive encounter toward a deeper understanding of "Intuitive Touch."

                        Let me talk about one of the most common processing errors we are prone to. Intuitions can easily be confused with fantasy projections, good and bad. (Commonly mistaking mirroring projections with a reversed referential index, causing blaming.)

Anecdote: Two shy people, (perhaps you and me,) notice each other. We are both decent respectful people. Not wanting to be rude, we both try to ignore each other. I can't help but notice you are way out of my league anyways. And even though you may be alone, you are probably much more popular and confident than me. (Projection) I've always resented those people who have to be the center of attention anyways. (Myself included.) The one thing that most of us never realize is even beautiful people can be very lonely too. There is an overwhelming probability that the very person you are noticing, at one time or another feels exactly the way you do. If that person is attractive, that person has probably heard every stupid line. They've seen every stupid jerk off arrogantly throw themselves at them; male, female, young or old, rich or poor, we all have seen people act like idiots in the presence of beauty or power. This is where a sensitivity of tact is really what most people need and want. You feel lonely being socially bored. A respectful distance may be required but as often as not, that is the wrong thing to do. That other person can be having exactly the same thoughts, ABOUT YOU. Don't assume. Look but don't stare. Even someone who has just been short with you, may respond favorably to a friendly response. And sometimes introducing is polite.

                       Now don't pee on yourself, and don't turn into a stalker. A lot of the beautiful people can be narcissists anyway and that's just ugly. But what I am saying is some of the kindest people you will ever meet are beautiful and they shouldn't be judged prematurely just because of their appearance alone.

                       Confidence building can give you the "Touch." Rapport is largely a matter of tact. As with any type of new learning experience there is a learning curve. Even what seems to be the straight forward proposition of a "Touch Training," is so fraught with nuance and subtext that the whole thing sounds like an insulting waste of time. Don't get bogged down in excuses. People who already know you, may not be the best for exploring new social skills. But then again, if your friends are "becoming" people, (growing and learning,) they may like exploring the touch of a person who is just learning too. Be honest and if necessary clinical, we are just learning. The secret to learning and mastering intuition is trust. And just like sincerity, you can't fake trust. You can be wrong about who to trust but you can't fake real trust. No where does this become more obvious than in the looping interplay of touch.

                        As I have chased away all of my psychic reading customers, I now have the time and energy for my work as a massage therapist. My work with pain management usually involves imagining what others are feeling as I stroke and massage deep connective tissues. Like as I mentioned, I don't find the experience easy for me, giving or receiving. But it has saved my life and sanity. While keeping me out of a wheelchair and in the gym, I was overjoyed discovering that I'm not the only person who is lonely for touch. Being a Satyr and an ecstatic, I had overwhelming concerns about touching people. After my separation from my "X" in "92," and my diagnosis of of partial paralysis from wry neck syndrome, I gave up on intimacy. I was in my fifties before I even considered dating again. It had been for over 15 years that I had avoided touching anyone.

                       It has come to my attention that the specific technicalities of psychic reading (Often it's a Fine Art of Bullshit, not without useful applicability.) is better documented than the sensitive art of intuition. When most people talk of the "intuitive" they in fact are referring to just meta formal logic, or ease of usabilty. As my documentation for the implicit structures of meta formal logic processing has been clearly outlined, I believe it is my responsibility to move on to the issues that are much more pertinent to the understanding and application of intuitions. When a product is marketed as being "intuitive," it's intended to be easy to understand. I know from looking at my own writing that what may seem intuitive to me isn't always intuitive to others. Often my arguments and intuitions are sensible to me only. But I'm getting much better at speaking and writing clearly.

                       Trusting yourself can be wonderful stuff. If you want to be able to trust your intuitions, "You may have the touch."