Some of the very strange traffic I get {from St. Petersburg?}

Page title

<motherboard.vice.com/read/this-pro-trump-russian-is-spamming-google-analytics>

More "Subtext" anyone? Found this on my Google Analytics page representing Client ID no. 510566204.1417637645

Average session time of 6hr. 39 mins. and 54 secs. Over 70 "Views" just this month.

Now I'm not recommending that you go to any of these sites even if they aren't hackports. But who knows? 

I've already gotten reports siting the exact inaccuracies of these websites design codes qualifying as internet 

fraud, even if it is wasn't for the sake of planting malware. Yes the Russians are hacking Google too. 

And if my writing's correct, Google may be one of the only intelligence services that exceeds the capacities of 

governments to do surveillance. And I have written extensively on this as well. 

And now for some more of my strange traffic:

Page title

<www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/5foynf/lifehac%C4%B8ercom_original_idn_fake_safe_best_on_ff/   />

Page title

lifehacĸer.com/new-revolutionary-shell-from-lifehacĸer.com 

Page title

Secret.ɢoogle.com

I've been documenting these strange hidden referral URL's coming through the Russian Porn Mafia masquerading as

innocent advertising for Premium Hookups for the whole life of my blog. They were the first thousand reads.

Just copying from the page URL's from my user explorer reports makes the BUGS in my blogger software go bonkers.

When I first see referring sites unrelated to anything vaguely connected to anything in my blog I Check and they may 

lead from Czech armaments dealers selling automatic weapons or Russian Poets. I've had to start showing some of 

my friends the results of my investigations into my fine art work a "Contra" Complementarian blogging, if only that my 

best stories are so very hard to believe. I'm fortunately a just nobody storyteller with a flair for creative snooping. 

I'm more curious than I am afraid. When I do criticize the worlds governments and "Intelligence" I want those in power 

to be better informed. My blog is even harder to decompress than the infinite scroll of Huffington Post. But everything 

that has happened to date suggests that for my sneaky Russians readers "Enquiring Minds Want To Know," even if 

they do prefer the National Enquirer to say the N.P.R. National Public Radio. If this wasn't so silly I would be a less glib 

and more cautious. READ ME! {Don't read me?}

Quoted from one of these most recent referring traffic sites: shtork.in {Shtorkina/ really cool gadgets.} 

" - How many times I have seen with my own eyes how the camel can pass through the eye of a needle?
- How many times I've seen a rich man can not enter into the kingdom of God?
- If God willed that no one was rich, why He made so much money?    Christopher Buckley. "Lord - my broker" 

Well I suppose if you got the money, then you're supposed to flaunt it. (How gross.)

As with all of my work, (most of which has nothing to do with espionage) I never expected for any of it have to to be believed. But there is no way I could make this garbage up. I don't even think like this and I never did. This has all been too interesting not to want to write about from the very beginning and I have with pleasure. I'm not a paranoid or a conspiracy buff, but I do love a good scary bedtime story. Nighty Night people. And we love you.

http://www.photogorky.ru/  This one I can recommend as safe. One of the only ones that is for real, and it's beautiful. 

Apologies Again to My Readers

                  I again must apologize for loosing sight of who I really am and how I've designed this Time Sensitive Literary Experiment. This project is mostly for the sake of documenting my work in the use of all Speculative Predictive Mediums in general. All of my work, I've been able to load into this Deep Dish Memory provided by our Great Grandmother to be, The Great Google. (or G. G. if you prefer) My "True Hoax" was intended to be found only when it can be proven to be correct and then therefor never a hoax in the first place. In a distant time my Propositional Assertions will be found to have been true all along. Following in the tradition which is cloaked in subterfuge, means I get to be the story teller, and I don't have to pretend to be objective. Even more importantly, I don't have to pretend I'm making sense all the time for now and that I'm getting to hide these proofs right here in plain sight where you don't even see them. You don't have to believe me, not one tiny bit. In fact I will continue to encourage harsh glaring rational skepticism. True Believers are going to be disappointed. "You Needn't Believe in Order to Perceive." How many more time will I have to say this?

                  But, I am more than a little ashamed that periodically I feel seduced into indulging in short term expectations. Hence I'm not always proud of what I write. I recently got caught up in allowing the criticism of a new "Follower" to my take my eyes off of the real prize, and incline me to start preaching. Even if my writing isn't always bad, it's not how I think. Virally shattering the Critical Mass Ceiling, accomplishes nothing if there is no content. Who cares if I can see the future? I don't.

                  The radiance of the human soul is the unifying transcendent principle that informs a person's future. I myself do not believe in God at all. But I do love God and what God means to people as a causal principle. Most of my Rational Skeptic friends respect my religiosity knowing perfectly well, I have no intention of pretending to be even vaguely spiritual, the blight of all new age perverts. But beings as I see unity where others see only doom, this guaranties I will continue to remain a web pariah. My Neutral Bias Fear demands I truthfully resist all temptations to pander.

                  My political fatigue is not entirely my own, nor was it ever. But I am still your Faithful Xenophile, and I only want what's right for everyone. I hope you will be able to understand why I'm going to continue to defy looking for easy answers to today's crisis in favor of much better long term solutions. I hope you don't judge me too harshly, but if you do I may indeed deserve your thoughtful opprobrium. As always I love you and the project is going much better than I could have expected. And I will be looking forward to getting see here again, sometime.

Reevaluating Statistical Distributions for the Reinvention of Possible Futures (+)

                   When we use personal and social variables as an analyzable form of data, we can delineate between Opposing Boundary Definitions to be able to make intelligent predictions. However we must also consider the limitations of our processing capacities. Creatively speaking, we are not to get ahead of ourselves, NEVER ASUME. We could be splitting controversial opinion biases, where everyone is looking at limited information. Understanding both extremes of an opinion is critical. Young minds may want to look ahead, (So to speak.) Old minds may be caught up in looking behind. But these too are just changing boundary definitions, also subjectively biased. Whenever we are confronted by "Projections," we may be talking fantasy, and we may be seeing the inevitable eventuality of truth. Either way, we may be sorting through a series of hypothetically asserted subjunctive speculations. If it isn't happening now, it's still uncertain. All deterministic prognostication has a confidence level that can only be ascertained through verifiable outcomes.

                    Phase states in Physics deal with this whole issue of uncertainty. Schrodinger's Cat is a famous thought experiment where a kitty in a box is trapped with a bomb set to go off if and only if, a particle with a set half life decays either triggering the bomb or not. Chances are 50%/50% that the bomb will explode, determined only by an uncertainty of that one particle's possible decay. Until the box is opened there is no way of knowing if our kitty still lives or not. As a reduction of the "Phase State" of that particle's subatomic uncertainties, this "Phase State" includes both the bomb and our cat. Erwin Schrodinger was a proponent of the classical physics of wave mechanics and had suggested that the resulting (Reductionist) phase state shouldn't matter. And that the cat is obviously either dead or alive when the box is opened. He'd say, "There has to be some way to predict the outcome, using Classical Physics." The quantum theorists (Heisenberg and others) proved how the sub atomic physics of particle states are in a statistically mechanical probability only. And therefore anything that is under the control of these mechanical uncertainties will also be subject to theese very same "Statistical Mechanics." In other words even our kitty is simultaneously both dead and alive, until we finally check for the results of this indeterminate uncertainty, reducible as a simultaneous "Superposition" of states. (Popular tea shirt amongst physics geeks shows a cat with the statement, "Schrodinger's Cat, Wanted Dead and Alive.") Our kitty doesn't seem to be observing the laws of cause and effect.

                    Steven Hawking has been paraphrased to say, "I don't care what the nature of reality is, I just want my experiments to work out, proving me to be correct." Much nonsense has been made of this confusing Quantum Superposition Mythos, used as justification for all kinds of unrelated New Age garbage. Peddled nonsense like, "You create your own reality," and "Scarcity is an illusion" Or ,"It's all in your own head." Now I don't to devalue the importance of having a heathy attitude, but generally our reality is a Shared Property, and not a magical outcome of a "Superposition of Opportunity," (self fulfilling prophecies simply are bad medicine.)  And yes, poverty, hardship and loneliness are real. We just have to take responsibility for our own lives whether we have been dealt a "Bad Hand" or not. (Probabilities randomize personal good or bad fortune, symbolized by a"Wheel of Fortune.") Blaming yourself for all the difficulties in life is just as self defeating as is blaming everyone else. If we want to reinvent our shared future histories, we are in essence reevaluating possibilities and predictably statistical distributions. We may not always be able to predict the future, (Much less directly create it,) but as is the case with all careers, this requires speculation. And it is always advisable to imagine possible desired outcomes.

                    Best of luck with your personal lives and shared fortunes.

American Auto Sexual; What Really Turns a XENOPHOBE On (Edited)

                  How do you stroke a Narcissist? By American Proxy. (Gangsters & Traders and Thugs, Oh my!) "Shock values are not just for differential equations anymore." Anyone may want to believe, we're supposed belong to very exclusive "IN" groups. But exclusivity itself is almost always defined by a pretense. Even well meaning people can often only respond to that which seems wrong in the moment, prompting hostile reaction. I myself, really do hate having to use so much pretentiously gimmicky loaded language. But unless I'm willing to stroke that bad monkey, "You may never get to read this." Pretenses are in essence nothing more than group biased misrepresentations, vying for your preferentially biased attention.

                  And as a result of our need to keep the "Twin Promises of the Arts & a Free Press alive, we must now become much more provocatively creative. Otherwise no one will ever even hear from us. The humorless approach to media dissemination may help us stay online with our own mutually defined sub cultures. But in our new mutually all inclusive Super Culture, we're here for everyones edification. Yes, I do know we might soon need to turn our backs on those groups of partisans, who choose to violently oppose us. But for now, that wouldn't be good Xenophilia. Being kind isn't the same as being antagonistic.

                  Humans are often very susceptible to idealizing the corrupt leaders, who share our biases. And Xenophobia is now going Global. But for the time being, much of the online media is simply appalling, false and base. As an example, some of the only comments I've ever gotten on my blog were in response to someone (Or something) redistributing my more controversial posts without my permission. Especially, my "Twin Promises of the Arts and the Free Press" which features a picture of the nude statue of Michelangelo's "David." Most, if not all of the comments, were about the unwanted distribution of unsolicited online pornography. I was warned that I would be reported for sending offensive pornographic materials. Until this had happened against my will, no one ever had said much of anything about any my blogs.

                  Documentary essays are in general, completely hidden from Search Engines, unless of course you "tag" your works with Market Index labels. Add that from within todays popular cultures of informational undertow, all literary submissions are subject to the online half life of an ever accelerating expiration date. Even good journalism is now getting lost in a constant stream of ubiquitous waste data, seeking immediate online engagement. So for now, we are back to trying to redefine how we want to play the game of online media engagement, "Shock values aren't just for differential equations anymore." I'm not suggesting that we indulge in aggressive "proxy wars" with the fake news industries, but we do need to be getting much more proactively creative.

Authoritation by Proxy, The Elephant Chain

                  Authoritation is only given by Proxy. (3rd party only) And as an example, there is supposedly no such word as Authoritation, yet. This word (my own invention,) means any third party giving precedence to the assumption of supposedly unimpeachably absolute authority. Wrongly assumed correct, (Catholic) sources of information, such as, "My church says," or "My party says," or  My teachers say," or "My Husband says, or my Stock Analyst says, or "My Preferentially Profiled Newsfeed tells me" etc" are generally deemed to be sacred. Even my creative re appropriation of language by intentional redesign is viewed as a blasphemy.

                  Thus the Elephant chain of political circuses often comes back to it's followers simply following all the other followers. Subservience to a cause often only comes from that fear of rejection by a person's group of identification. That's why I try to write about the

shifting of personal and public opinion biases, including rational and irrational bias fears. We';re in unexplored territory here, and I must say we all sound a little awkward trying to make sense of our irrational world. When I tell my body builder friends, "Bodybuilding isn't homosexual, it's auto sexual," they growl. But when I say, "Arnie says," (Arnold Schwarzenegger) everyone smiles and is happy. Wow. I just don't have credibility, at least when it comes to body builder sex. I hoping to make Authoritation a real word in the dictionary, within my lifetime. {Boy do I sound silly.} Thank you for bearing with me.

Fake News, Yellow Journalism, Popular Paranoias and Poisoned Code Rings in General {Edited Test Repost}

                  Common Enemies can very be hard to come by. Popular antagonists have always taken what we love to hate to ever new levels of denial and disassociation. I often hear people say that the "Disinformation is coming directly from an evil government conspiracy."

                  But! Does it? Is there a governmental "Office of Disinformation?" There certainly wouldn't have to be, anyone could be making this garbage up. Our society generates so much of it's own lies, without any help from the government. All a corrupt government needs to do is to play on public bigotries and hatred. Most of the really good conspiracy yarns are just too good not to believe supposedly, or so "They" say. (Again, who is they?) And so, just like with the New Testament, stories like these are just too good for any one person to make up in the first place. Right?

                   But! Could anyone have ever have thought this stuff up by themselves, or is it done in closed committees? Sorry about comparing the "Gospel" to disinformation in general, but I'm not trying to take sides in this argument. I'm merely pointing out a very dark side to mass "Group Think." That which is "Stranger than Fiction," probably can't be fabricated. Can it? Hence the unanticipated outcome of our Pres-elect "Donbot's" blunder into the all powerful royal "Hotseat" of American nobility. After this last election, I've been having to do a lot of emotional interventions. A common enemy would have been so much easier to succumb to, or to simply overthrow directly. But now that my United States {an Oxymoron} has finished segregating itself into bi coastal urban Liberals (of which I'm proud to belong) and the white bread creamy middle"American" white bred's, we may never have to look at each other ever again, accept for on the news. And even the news now days isn't real anymore. And it isn't trusted by anyone anymore anyways. My friends are understandably scared and despondent about a threat of what may yet still be to come. (But may not even come to pass.)

                   So! Our newly elected presidential edition "Trumpmbot" is not very well known for self restraint when it comes to his paranoid "reactionism" {My word} to his perceived attackers. He has not been that well programed. As I have written; "the Courts will be cluttered with nuisance lawsuits like we have never seen before." The R. N. C. (Republican National Committee) is going to try to keep things going, but this was an undeserved and unexpected win for them, and they don't even agree with themselves very much right now.

                   So! The "Right Flight" is coming to eat away at the Republican Party from the inside out. Catholics and Misogynists who intend to ban abortion, will now have to join with the Racists and Xenophobes who are finally back out of the closet again, all while denying Global Warming. This one is on the Republicans  to restrain, for themselves. Or else the renewal of popular Fascism will come to come to roost directly on Wall Street and bring about an economic collapse of Biblical proportions. These things are why my fellow Liberals are so scared.

                   But! I believe there will be far more "Moderate" Republicans than there are Fascists, (I hope) as hard as this is for most of my Liberal friends to accept. If and only if, the Republican party doesn't reel in it's criminally uninformed, we will witness a "RIGHT FLIGHT" out of the Republican Party faster than you can say "YOU'RE FIRED." Reality Programming is about to get a big taste of a real "Rage of Compassion." Brought to you by the good people at our "Mutually Inclusive" Whole Mother Earth World, en mass. And reluctantly, the Middle American Fatherland isn't going to do anything more than barely maintain a dangerous and uncomfortable status quo. (I think?)

A Rose Colored Darkness; Seeing the World Through

                  Please forgive me for seeing this world as a "Cup Overflowing." Now that we have gotten to see the power of popular negativity and paranoid predictions, I've discovered that my own cynical optimism is commonly misinterpreted as apathy. Or even worse, Amoral Conformity." I'm merely advocating for a rational dissent, opposing the presumptions of an inevitable spiral into unavoidable futility and defeat.

                  One man's response to the very real possible threat of censorship in our disinformation driven news feed society, was to say "Greater evil needs to remain in scope to justify the aim for the lesser evil. So the policy spirals towards it like a moth to the flame."

                  Click Bait was the term he used to criticize my comment about how, "I find it prophetic that all my wacko popular paranoia friends turned out to be right about one thing. Interesting Times. Don't you know?"
                  About my comment he says, "You do sound like click bait, except for the minor aspect that there's nothing to click on."

                   I commented back;

"What is click bait, and how does that relate to me? What are you trying to do, seriously? Did I offend you? I'm not a pollyanna. Don't give up so quickly! I've been fighting this battle with well meaning fear mongers and popular paranoids on both sides, all my life. I guess I don't like being called trivial. "Greater evil needs to remain in scope to justify the aim for the lesser evil," sounds like a tautology. I neither agree with you or consider haute' pessimism constructive. Determinism is the preferred mode of condescension for people who like condemning the faith and hopes of people who actually know real oppression. I find negativity to be too easy."

      And I always have resisted. In the Eighties it was the fear of the inescapable "Nuclear Winter." I would say, "We should be so lucky." "Only real hardships drive mankind onward toward any shared enlightenment." Nobody likes hearing this, back then or now. And of course I was thought to be an "Amoral Conformist" for insisting on the real facts of what is happening, instead of just another silent advocate for futile determinism. The threat was real. But the outcome wasn't, and still is primarily only a threat. There is real evil in the world, but the worst of it may be  the rationalizations of paralytic apathy. The world isn't any worse off now than it ever was. It just that the scale of the problems are much larger with the worlds power, technologies and exponentially growing populations. From a "Bronze Age" perspective we could say, "A Succession of Cyclical Histories is Simply Repeating Itself," as we generally do. And that it is our sense of lost collective memory that is what is making people so fearfully reactionary.

      I find a greater threat looms in the expectation of futility in the face of our very real and contemporary opportunities for real free expression, right now, today. Now is the time and it always has been today we need to address. Things will only continue to get worse if we don't use this and every opportunity to speak out for what is right, actually making ourselves heard. Stand up against populist determinism on both sides of the "Split Bias," which is so easily exploited by populist polarization and fashionable paranoia. Of course my "Use it or Loose it" philosophies aren't much appreciated right away. But most of my extreme Liberal friends end up agreeing with me, that even if the worst is yet to come, for most of us that impending "Threat of Violence" needs to be challenged right now, before it can get out of hand. And that we're never to loose hope for what is right.

      I'm sorry if I offend people by taking such a dim view of "Doomsayers," when they are only expressing a healthy apprehension, in the face of what is humanly frightful and truthfully monstrous. But wasn't it fear mongering and exaggeration that got our nation to stop listening to itself in the first place?