#4. EVERYBODY NEEDS LOVE

                                                                                     
   

              Why everybody needs love.                                                                April 25th, 2013


                    I realize I am beginning a catalog of topic concepts, terminology and technical perspectives on the subject of psychic reading. I have probably asked more questions than I have even begun to answer. But we will see. Enter: An anatomy of the psyche?

          This blog is just me reading to the best of my ability.  Ouch.

         Not important. This literary experiment is an un-predicated exercise. ("Is this the party to whom I am speaking?")  Words can obscure simple awareness of observation. ("Obscurity is not a virtue." Benoit  Mandelbrot,  From his book,  Fractals in Nature).  Concepts that are difficult.  Beliefs that are in doubt.  Language can be vague.  I can't watch your individual reactions to be able to tell if what I am writing is even making sense to you.

        The overwhelming difficulty of what I am trying to document is both exciting and a crushing bore at the same time.  I feel like I'm not going to have any friends.

        Fortunately this isn't about me.  So for the sake of clarity I'm going to start my next blog to compile that repository of the purely technical aspects of divination and diagnostics,  detail oriented.

        Let's take a clean clarifying break from my self indulgent attempts at self justification as the self doubting psychic.  Obviously the breadth and scope of these subjects deserve direct simplicity.

        This Image of a heart is from the PACIFIC TECH Graphic Calculator : User Galllery

        The new blog site will be. < ppireaders.blogspot.com> (Under Construction)

     
                                                                   April 25th, 2013

#3. SOME PEOPLE ARE VERY DIFFERENT, VERY DIFFERENTLY.

     
         How different are some people?                                            April 25th, 2013


                  Enter:
        The Interest Based Learning;  For the love of what we can learn,  and for those with whom we learn;   I dedicate this bitter sweet love poem.

         As children we sometimes embark on journeys that take our whole lifetimes.  As children we are at times maturing too quickly, and we may be forced to be better adults than our own parents or teachers. Beginners luck and innate talent sometimes adds to this pain and chaos of prodigy.  Were you a wonderkind? Were you too an heir to the madness of inspiration, melancholy or genius?  "Mother don't let your children grow up to be artists."

         In examining different people and personal differences,  I've found that you don't have to be a genius per se in order to be absolutely brilliant about something.  In fact if you want to find out how smart someone can be, look at how a person deals with what they love, with that which is most sacred to them. Boom.

         I believe that almost everyone is exceptional in someway.  Everyone is normal in this way,  diversity is the great equalizer.  Anyone can be an outlier. (Wish I wanted to go into the math at this point.  But I don't.  Hopefully much more on the Math, Statistics and Systems analysis later.)

         Looking for that singularly distinguishing identifier is the only reason I can justify taking up to $60.00 bucks an hour for consultations and much more for parties, classes, therapy and/or conferences. I may be selling myself short again because I know how much the title of psychic or healer has been exploited.  My teacher once said, "Would you trust anyone who wanted to be a psychic?"  (paraphrased;  from 1980)   Just like a politician, "You would have to wonder if they are insane and/or corrupt."

          But then again you might worry about anyone who risks confronting overwhelming odds or opposition.  Why would anyone ever "want" to suffer the rejection of being different.

          So how different is different?  Or as a reluctant genius once said, "What is normal?" I think the point my friend made is, "Normal compared to what?" But I believe my friend was rebelling against the tyranny of enforced mental health and the way we are expected to compete for status as the "designated" Mentally Ill.  He's maybe right that everyone is sick in some way or another, but I still think he just didn't like seeing himself as different or exceptional. But he is. And that's beside the point.

          If my friend had been respected for his real smarts as a child and not been beaten into just another muscle stud with illusions of normalcy, maybe he would be less critical of my reasonable deviance from being normal.   Blah, Blah,...Blah.  That's not even the point. The question is how do we measure being different.  Very differently.  This is where the process is academic.  I've been avoiding the technicalities. Please forgive me, there will be plenty of time for modeling and mapping diagrams latter.
     
          At this point I would like to enumerate four "Styles of Evasion."

              1.  Active deception, Showing Off, Lying, Phonyness, Bragging, Exaggeration, Hyperbole,  etc.
              2.   Spacing out, Disengagement, Withdrawal, Omission, Vagueness, Aloofness, etc.
              3.   Condescension, Put downs, Dismissal,  Negation, Passive Aggression, etc.
              4.  Over Compartmentalization, Inaccessibility, Burnout, Over Conscientiousness etc.

          You probably recognize any or all of these evasions in yourself and or others.  Some more than others.  I'm showing the ways we confront or avoid the stresses of uncertainty. When in doubt, learned styles of evasion take over.  A little Meta Formally Logical diagram to demonstrate;

                                                                    2. Spacing Out
                                                         1. Lying       +      3. Condescension
                                                                    4. Burnout

          At the center of this diagram is the uncertainties we all can evade, just in our own way.  You will notice the symmetry and the two axis of polarity. Openness to these uncontrolled uncertainties is the mark of a truly open person. It is almost impossible to be open all the time. We have these evasions hardwired into our survival instincts. The next time you see someone being evasive, consider the source. They/We maybe feeling vulnerable.

          The two axis are; Horizontally,  Positive Misrepresentation of fact on the left side and the Negative Misrepresentation of emotions on the right side.     
                                       Vertically, Passive Evasion of responsibility on top and the Active Evasion of irresponsibility on the bottom.

          No point in making a big deal about the why we behave this way, even if the emergence of this kind of soul symmetry is more than many of you are going to be willing to accept. Just know that when we evade, we use energy and that any real sensitive will know it. Show a little empathy. This is where I get to show a little tact.

#1. A PERSONS GUESS IS ALWAYS BETTER THAN ODDS WOULD ALLOW.

                          Table for the Four Rules of the Para Psychological Method:
   

       In the order of their proposition;
 1st.    A PERSONS GUESS IS ALWAYS BETTER THAN ODDS WOULD ALLOW.

 2nd.   EVERYONE HAS BLIND SPOTS AND EVERY ONES BLIND SPOTS ARE DIFFERENT.

 3rd.    SOME PEOPLE ARE VERY DIFFERENT, VERY DIFFERENTLY.

 4th.    EVERYBODY NEEDS LOVE.

        These may be trite truisms that might be hard to prove or disprove, but the data that can be used to analyze these assertions are fruitful and exemplify the diversity of tools and resources at my fingertips.

         Ah statistics. I was 9 yrs. old (1966) when I proposed the first one. Growing up in one of the best school districts in So. Calif. the parents of my chums were brilliant. Our schools were chosen for us on the basis of academic promise.  So when I proposed to prove the 1st. proposition by guessing at cards shuffled randomly from across a room, Mrs. "X" said that the Monte Carlo Method of calculating odds was tailor made for this kind of a test.  Here's where things got out of hand.
       
         Guessing just the number; Ace, Deuce, three, all way up now through ten, Jack,  Queen and King, Rusty started guessing way too many right. Oh Oh.  We had him wear a black cloth blindfold with cotton under his eyes.
         1st Rusty guessed just 6 or 7 guessed right. Within a reasonable margin of error. Then over 10 guessed correctly out of the whole deck, it didn't stop there. Then Rusty guessed over 15 right. He then managed to get 36 out of 52 cards right. Rusty was a very bright kid, but there is still no justifiable explanation. Suffice it to say, Mrs. "X" made us stop playing that game and made us go outside to play. I realized early on that as absurd as these results were, for me it had proved 2 very important points. 1st,  My primary assertion might have been right, and to add even more evidence, I had also made a profound intuitive leap. A persons guess may indeed be better than odds would allow. But when? Was my beginners luck hold up?

         I'll get to "blind spots" next.   Also a bonanza of statistical "Magic."
       
         This one is even more interesting from an analytical perspective. In the same way different people see color differently,  we also have preferences that skew our tastes and perspectives away from or toward unique awarenesses obscuring other sensitivities.  This whole notion of personal bias arose from my observations about people often having no awareness of things they choose to ignore, deny, disbelieve and/or avoid.  One of the most extreme cases I've seen was a man who believed that the change of season was from the earth moving closer to the sun. He even made an elliptical calendar like a race track around an off center sun. Nothing could get him to look at the angle of the sun or the January summer in Rio De Janeiro. I have even had a Astrophysics Professor who insisted the tides only come in and go out once a day. We do live in a land locked state.

          What is most significant about this variability of perspective isn't just right or wrong but the way nature insists that we see things very differently. Yes. Signature and fingerprint, by 24, I started using this basic assertion as a Systems Analysis for the Transformative Medium of shifting Opinion Biases. As we learn our perspectives can change.  In my short life of 57 yrs. I've gone from mocked for my views on Alternative Medicine to being grilled by doctors and medical professionals for my secrets.  They want to know how I dragged myself back from the edge of the grave and what I do professionally.  I've learned not to persuade people.  As my Christian Scientist Grandmother would say, "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still." Go Granny. (She would also say, "Know the truth." But that often was just her obstinate denial of hard reality.)

          This is particularly important when understanding perceptual barriers.  This observational science of the perceptual differences necessitates honesty, subjectively for us as individuals, and also objectively as witnesses. We can hope that as these issues of personal differences of perspective can be understood, so we may be able to build better bridges for communicating between one person and another. Mine is a thankless job of finding the points of access to the broken commonalities.
     
          As an expression of our shared intelligence, I believe nature makes our individual perceptions as distinctive as a fingerprint or a signature. And besides, if everyone saw everything the same way there would be no point in lying, as any deception would be obvious. Hence there would be nothing to learn from understanding peoples personal evasions. (More on Styles of Evasion and the means of deception later as we examine further the personal differences and their extremes/outliers in the next chapter.)

The Barrier of Symbolic Language

                            The Barrier of Symbolic Language                     April 23rd, 2013


                  The term Symbolic Language is math talk for precise symbols and methods of things like Calculus and Vector and Tensor analysis. Most people have an aversion to language that is difficult.
[ Coding Density?/ Foreign Language?]
                 
                   I realize I've been beating up on my fellow psychics and now to be fair, it's your turn belligerent science. When it comes to matters of faith people work hard at building walls.  I'm building a bridge between the supposedly antagonistic contenders for the attention of the faithful.  Latin Mass or Physics Lecture, it doesn't matter. Language is used to communicate and/or alienate.

                    I love math just like I love Jesus. But both are abused and taken for granted.  People who worship the slide ruler are often as sadistic as, well...,  I think I need to get specific.

                    When I first started getting my sanity back, I again started using a simple drafters compass to divide the arcs of the circle, (Meta Formally Logical and Enumerate Partitioned)/(Ancient Time Keeping Metrics).  It turns out to be much much easier to use a compass and a straight edge than it is to try to do the same Geometry with a Graphics Calculator Software.

         Similarly it has been the case with using small varied round clear stones to prove the "Preverbal Ordering Principle":
       
         Each stone is different, just like people; (Size, Shape, Color, Clarity, etc.)
       
         Each stone is a discreet entity, just like people; (One Stone, One Person.)
       
         It's much easier to remember each stone without symbolic language, naming is secondary, (John is just a name.), just like people; (If you can't remember what someone looks like, a name wont matter.)
       
         And the counting of all compared sampling specimens form their own comparative groups,  just like us people.  As humans we have been imposing Symmetrical ways of Collating groups for as long as we can remember. This Symmetrical Coalescence / Meta formally Logical,  is at the core of all Ancient Spiritual Technologies.  [Father/Mother,  Brother/Sister]/{Day/Night, Morning/Evening}

                     Our animal brains are much too developed to be limited to linguistics alone. It's just to slow.  That's not to diminish this most precious shared resource of shared language, which should not be dumped. To the contrary I want Math to be the universal language, but that's asking a lot. The need for intuitive simplicity will always demand that thought experiments will take precedence over the much more difficult hard technology. I'm fortunate to have had a lifetime to study. When it comes to defining differences between stones, people, concepts or even just variabilities in general, in between said objects and/or subjects,  categories of comparison emerge. Language is our shared naming and ordering of categorized objects and subjects.

                     Point being now days the term intuitive is thrown around with equally vague arrogance by commercial new age marketeers as is done by the sales representatives of computers.  The language of both seemingly opposed world views are pandering and spiritually exploitative. I'm hoping that with my own overwhelmingly neutral opinion bias, that if I must offend, I intend that I have offended everyone equally without alienating anyone.           Good luck.

True Ethics Are Never Private Property

       
         True Ethics Are Never Private Property                                                        April  21st,  2013

                      If you wonder why I have been belaboring this issue of Boundary Definitions by Opinion Bias,  it's because no where are our intuitive sensitivities more focused.   As a sensitive it is my job to understand others. This requires unbelievable style, subtlety and tact. (Style, subtlety and tact, not my words. More on my teacher later.)

                      I'm not interested in dwelling on my own indifference to opinion bias, everyone has bias and no one can be entirely free from bias. Nor should one expect that bias is a bad thing.  When we are presented with alternative perspectives we all experience shifts in focus, some good some not so much.  That is not to say that all opinions are equally right. Much to the contrary, sometimes our individual blind spots are reenforced by ignorance and stupidity. Notice I said, "our."  There is almost nothing more difficult than having to tell the truth under overwhelming opposition.

                      I strongly believe, and I do believe, that so as we have inherited a traditional moral code, I also believe we must consider ethics.  Without the review and analysis of the moral code we would never have acquired the means to confront the abuse of power. Nor would we have had the need to evolve a system of ethics that allows for personal differences and the conflicts that ensue.  

                      Understanding the larger issues of these differences of bias is the domain of the human dynamic.  Philosophy aside I would hope that I've given more than ample weight to the issues of bias, because this will be central to the mapping systems of this soft tech of reading people.

                      Can I be any more clear?

Sensitive Emotional Boundaries

                                 Sensitive Emotional Boundaries               Apr 20, 2013


            The main reason I started with cataloging the concepts was that I needed to have directions.
         
            Next we will start with;    "The Personal Boundary Space."   Defining your own emotional boundaries and sensitivity can be critical to understanding others.  We must take responsibility for being aware of others feelings. We need to be able to protect ourselves.  Being able to appreciate people as individuals is a virtue and a gift. Being able to read peoples mind for me is just a side affect of caring.
I love my job.  I just need to be really be careful.  Blah,  Blah,... Blah.  And so on.

            As "Sensitives,"  we "Psychics" have to protect ourselves.  Plus all people have some kind of
                                                              "BIAS  FEAR"

            I really do prefer that people come to me with some skepticism. Point is I don't have to let my own personal biases get in the way of me getting to work with people.  Telling you this is my way of weeding out the stragglers. I don't want unreceptive clients. I don't want people to agree with me. I prefer the company of people different from me.  In working with people I like not having to judge other people or take their inventory.

            Now to the boundaries, this is where you find the real pros.   I'll demonstrate using some personal biases and basic boundary issues that I have;
                                   
            I've come to love looking at peoples hands.  Palms and Handwriting. I get to hold peoples hands, thousands of them. I feel them. Everyone feels different to me.  I'll be using models to demonstrate the actual statistical mapping for variability, more later.

            This is a thousand times more sane than this sounds. I'm perfectly aware how different people feel about these issues. I always support people in faith. And I love people for whatever they believe. I also do inductive massage touching and feeling others. Treating pain, grief and loss.  I have been loathed by psychics who say that I don't believe, and that I'm just doing it by the numbers. I have enough faith to want to master my craft. DO THEY?

             I'm a very gifted reader.  But I don't believe in it at all. And I'm really good at it. Too good. And I don"t believe in any of it. But it works. I love reading. It's hard work.  I have pride.

            This exemplifies the practical absurdity of me being a psychic.  I have issues. And I feel it is more than disrespectful to dismiss any ones opinion and it is not my place to criticize.
           
            I would very much like to not make this about me. I'm not complaining at all. Don't get me wrong. I actively experience life as a sensitive. I think it's good luck to be able to tell which voices are inside of me alone. I hear so much.  I totally buy into the pure magic.  What I get to do with people is not easily dismissed. This isn't about me. It never was. And I'ld like to prove it.  Looking at peoples hands. Looking into their eyes. Listening to their voices. Touching their bodies. I read into the metaphorical stars.

            And by the way, another bias fear I have, I choose not to be attracted to people, I don't like sexual tension. "Intuitive Apprehension" and "Intuitive Tension" creates a boundary between self and others, a mirror of sorts. The "Mirror of Karma" is written about in the "Tibetan Book of the Dead."  All your good and evil deeds are reflected therein.  Attachment does come with disincentives and moral hazards.                      
           
            I myself am showing symptoms of a "Neutral Opinion Bias Fear"  I don't want to take sides.
The opinion biases between so called believers and non believers and detractors and advocates are actually about the same to me.  When it comes to psychics most people are at least a little skeptical. Being sensitive about people's beliefs and desires has made getting to see peoples hands easy and fun.

            People almost always like my readings very much. I make people very comfortable.
I do have a strong Bias, but it is neutral. Let us proceed to the next most immediate sensory boundary, "Others."

             How do we perceive others? We use our senses. People can either enjoy being read or it can be a violation. Let someone read you, you should have a choice, it should not be an abuse of power. Usually some of the easiest people for me to read are the dry stoics who are very easy to understand, largely because they think they can't be read. Fortunately people with thick boundaries can also be very shrewd and perceptive and are often the best intuitives themselves. Though they, (and maybe all of us) are always denying that there might be some important subtlety that they/we are not aware of.

               I do not believe in type casting but I will be going over maps for analysis and for comparison of types and typologies.  Thank you for holding up your end of the bargain.  Still learning.

1st demonstration of ancient analysis by Enumerate Partition

                                                                                                                  April 17th, 2013

                                                  As is normal for me I've approached a challenge way beyond my abilities,  and it is resulting in my falling on my face.  That said,  Thank you,  I'm really enjoying this.

     Took a few days off to focus thoughts.  My friends request that I explain Simultaneous Incarnation first as a Dyad. It has moved my thoughts forward.  I saw that the Implicit structure of the human Dyad exemplifies the Meta Formation of rudimentary thought.  I see that the extension of the awareness of self to "other" is this most primary of distinctions.  We will be seeing how this relation of the primary duality, it's boundary and it's definition by distinctive differences will be at the core of analysis and it's comparison to the Self and others.

     And by splitting the halves in half we are forming the origin of all circular models.  (i,e.  Day,   Night;   Sun rise,  Sun set.  Day after Day.  Simple.)  Meta Formal Logic seems like a burdensome proposition at first but when you can see how simple it really is, it becomes obvious why intuitive thought seems so unconscious.  Most of what we "Think" is so fundamental,  that we barely even notice.

     At this point I can jump off directly into the first of our shared Meta Formal antiquities,  Ancient Astronomy.  Let's go back to Bronze Age Babylonia.  This is the source of the origins of the Hours, Minutes and Seconds.  Hence the eventual clock,  plus the 360 degree circle and the 12 Astrological signs.  Supposedly no one knows why we settled on these divisions. But with the use of diagrams I expect,  I will make a very plausible explanation as to why it is the only logical number system based on the Meta Logical analysis of the arcs of the Circle.  (Elementary Geometry And ancient Trigonometry)

      I must confess, this 1st demonstration of the use of  the applied  analysis,  "Enumerate Partition," came off much better than I had hoped.  I am adapting skills in desktop publishing. I want the rest of the propositions and proofs to go just as easily.