Friday, April 12, 2013

Mappings for the Self as a Unity

                                                                                                                                       April 12th, 2013
     


                                                      Mappings for the Self as a Unity


      Yesterday I started outlining simple language we all use to order our perceptions of what being alive involves.  I basically wanted to show how easy it is to take apart language in it's simple utility. I also started showing the way we organize the fundamental pieces we use to communicate.  Just like taking a watch apart, we will usually find disassembling something as complex as language, easier than putting that watch back together in working order again.

      Although I have no reason to reinvent the wheel of language, I have had to come up with a few of my own new words.  The "Symmetrical Coalescence" is the process I describe when I compare and design models that map for this "Totality" of each and every person. Up to now this has often been the domain of poets as well as teachers. Each person is a universe, and each of us is just the tiniest part of this greater universe. People have often tried to believe that we create our own reality.

      I much prefer the quote from the ancient Upanishads; "The self is ubiquitous."
 
                   Enter;
                             Central Premise,  We exist.  Core to our awareness is the means to inform and instruct.  Communication is a force, an energy and a potential. And although, "In the beginning there was the word," fortunately we are not always limited or defined by just words. Sometimes we can become aware of more than just the parts. Words sometimes come together to make the unexpected.
   
      A love that defies description, a joy inexpressible, even things more important than life itself. Life transcends description.  Put this amazing timepiece of human consciousness back together again and suddenly we are "greater than the sum of our parts."

      The models I will be using have these simple commonalities;
               1. All models are made of pieces.
               2. All the models compare analogously to whatever subject we are analyzing.
               3. All models are Meta Formally Logical, (Based on the Fundamentals of Conceptual Language.)
               4. All models are designed, regardless of the mystical implications.
               5. And most importantly, because these magical systems were the result of generations of cultural evolution and study, each one is a "coalescence" of data.  Lots and lots of data.
               6. All of these modelings are communicated and are traditions and cultural institutions.   Mappings are for the analysis of the Self as individual Unities.

         We will be looking at;
               1. Astrology and ancient Astronomy     (historical origins of timekeeping and math)
               2. Chinese Medicine and Philosophy    (origins of chemistry and physiology)
               3. Tarot   (Evolutions of Mystical Christianity and Judaism)
               4. And my own specialty, Palmistry and Handwriting Analysis.  (Statistics and Analysis)

          At the core of each subject are humanities attempts at an Observational Science of the human, all leading from fundamentals to specifics, coalescing immense resources. Although all have undergone revision, these are just the short list of diagnostic and predictive tools.

          Mappings are for the analysis of the Self as individual Unities.

   

No comments:

Post a Comment

Is there anybody out there?