https://plus.google.com/107029281598679098049/posts

                                 https://plus.google.com/107029281598679098049/posts
                    This is so people can find the Math Graphics which are a kind of an indirect proof of all the other types of intuitive creativity, that evades the short sighted. The non linear production of creative assertions are usually lost in plain sight and are therefore "Pearls before swine." I only hope that not everything I've done is bad. Tap on the linking URL.

                                  https://plus.google.com/107029281598679098049/posts

Proper Care and Feeding of your Propositional Assertions

                   Up to this point I've been teaching you how to predict the future by searching for the truth. As investigators we create. Right or wrong, we create. Ask a question and the truth is out there. It's often where you look last. The truth can even be hidden where we have already looked. But until we have made ourselves ready, the truth can persist to evade us. This is where we can have a consensus of mutual blind spots.

                    A propositional Assertion can be like a magical incantation, or even a poem. We all make plans and commitments, that doesn't mean that every thing turns out the way we want, but we still project ourselves into possible futures. Think of your Propositional Assertions like planned parent hood. Conceptually, there is nothing complicated about making propositions. Even if you're not very assertive you can actually make viable assertions. The truth almost seems to have a life of it's own. But it can't speak for itself. "In the beginning there was the word, and the word was made manifest." You yourself may not yet see the life of truth, but look to the works of poems. See how truth may speak to you. And you will ask, "How did they do that?" that is the right question and you may soon learn the answer. It starts with an assertion. A statement. A proposition that starts the dialog, the proposition is like your children. You love the truth even at great cost. For you, what you believe to be true will be sacred. Just go with it. I'm not advocating giving up control to your muse, I merely suggest that if you want to understand how we create, it is the same for how we approach truth. There is some unknown, some uncertainty, it moves into the center of our attention and it becomes of some value to us. Enough so as that we give ourselves to that pursuit of truth or understanding until it becomes real for us or we look somewhere else. For most of us this focus on the uncertain is undramatic. But we all can experience moments of meaning and closure.

                     As I've repeated "Truth is the only eventual inevitability." My 4 Propositional Assertions are;
       1.) A persons guess is always better than odds would allow.
       2.) Everyone has blind spots, and everyones blind spots are different.
       3.) Some people are very different, very differently.
       4.) Everybody needs love. (All things are drawn to love, {Power?} especially love.)

                     These are not weak truisms. These are my armor. This is my truth. It's not about me and I promised in the final analysis this would not be about me. I had to allow that many paths to the undertaking of Intuitive Diagnostics would become rational for popular culture as the result of the inevitable shifting of popular opinions. I merely predicted it in a way that ultimately makes sense, I hope. But that's the thing about building your own propositional assertions. They are born of love. It's the antithesis is censorship. Viral statements merely obscure. Your propositional assertions are statements of intent, without pretense of authority. This is what make the advances in science and medicine so powerful, truth ultimately asserts itself and becomes inevitable. Can you see your minds whirling in doubt, frustration and denial? You can help it, you are under the effect of rational doubt. Unlike viral statements, ("Branding?") thoughtful propositional assertions feed on Rational Denials. This is how you test your assertions to see if they are true. Start gently, Then improve your testing mediums ability to challenge your assertions confidently.

                     Look at the 4 primary propositions of the para psychological methods. They have Number (Enumerate Partition). And they reconstruct into a Unity (Coalescent Symmetry). These are all statistical models for analyzing information about people and our health. If you haven't worked with Intuitive Diagnostics up to this point, then this will seem to be so much gibberish. But if you have, you have seen this useful though seemingly artificial compartmentalization of data used predominantly throughout the world. Then Intuitive Diagnostics may not offend you.

                     As my Croatian Sociology professor would say, "Make predictions, and be prepared to be wrong."

Threshold of Truth, Finding NEW FAITH

                   I can't tell you how often my friends ask, "What's it good for?" (Can it be used to make money? How does it relate to something that has meaning to me,"or anyone else for that matter?") I find it strange that a treatise on the mechanisms of evolving changes in society and personal awareness would seem so pointless. I found a few good models for explaining variability of perception and personal awareness, but it always seems to come back to just business. How much do you want to learn how to read people correctly? How much would I have to pay you for you to want to learn something that "today" is thought of as being uselessly esoteric.

                   The likelihood is that Self Searching Propositions will become much more common. Hard problems don't have to be hard to understand! Enquiring minds want to know. We will be able adapt to asking questions that DON'T already have answers, (No immediate payoff?). People and society will be much less inhibited about using different kinds of data processing, not just applications. For now people like feeling awed and intimidated by technology (when they're not pissed off by it.) But that's mostly because of the inevitable fear and boredom that comes from over specialization. Most people worship the "RED CODE." They don't even want to understand. It's much easier for people to want to be told what is going to happen. Or we may antagonistically think that the future holds no inevitable force whatsoever. Pro or con, truth or deception, I try to understand why people would rather take sides and play follow the leaders. For most people, getting "Authoritation by Proxy" is such an overwhelming temptation that we almost always expect others to know how to think and when to act and why, and this of and by itself isn't even the problem. I come to you, and tell you, you and your opinions are going to change by orders of dimensions. And you will not know what to do. People want to think that it's everyone else that is going to have to change their point of view. I do understand, I just don't know if I can explain or demonstrate. Understanding the "Code of Language" is much harder to communicate than it is to persuade or intimidate.

                    My father always said, or my teacher said, or the doctors say, or Alan Greenspan says. What do you say? Are they right? wrong? Don't know? How DO YOU DECIDE? And how are your views changing? We have already looked at "Non Falsifiability," is a very dubious criteria for absolute truth. What would you say? One of the biggest taboos of today is directed against the courage to doubt erroneously "Dense Code." It is equally common to curse against the complexity of modern technical language out of resignation or rebellion. I know many who say they are open and faithful, but their eyes and ears are closed to anything that would require a "NEW FAITH" of any kind. A "NEW FAITH" in myself may be the only way I can achieve what it is I have set out to do. I do not have the means at this time to make these simple easy assertions accessible. My research says that even if and when I can predict the future, just like Cassandra from Greek Literature, it will not make sense to anyone. All I can really do is to be humble and hope that the process is understood. But even that isn't going to come easily.

The Tyranny of a "Red Code"

                   I have seen more than a few proud souls give their life to the mastery of "Code." What is that mystery that binds us to achieve? No where is the human more vulnerable than when bound by a superior principle. Even very good people can be mislead by contaminated code. Ethics, Values and Principles, the trifecta of greatness. Mine is obviously making sense of the intuitive. For me there is nothing sub rational about intuitive inductive reasoning. But that is only because I actively accept the limitations of the "Medium." As I particularly love the beauty of the great coalescence of disciplines, being wrong generally doesn't bother me. This gives me an huge advantage. But it also makes me very unpleasant. "Complementarity" is the only reason I can stand up for myself as I don't agree with most anybody, pro or con. That's how strong my lust for knowledge is.

                   I've been told not to call what I'm doing the Johnson Method. I must confess, because of the likelihood of people avoiding doing the homework, I must allow for the awkwardness of bringing advanced Spiritual Technology to the general public. This is my "RED CODE."

                   Trying to apprehend the outcome of events on the level of society in transition is not for the faint of heart. Influence Matrices mapping for the dissemination of "The Self Propagating Assertions. Projective differentiation across the shock values and uniform discontinuities of predictions, means we are analyzing the particularity of data first as parts and pieces into the Inevitable Self Coalescing Totality. I know it sounds like B. S. But all discoveries of the "truth" have a scientific dimension. The challenge is as humans we have natural intellectual limitations that prevent any objectivity at all. Don't take it personally. My faith in what I'm "Trying" to do, provides me with unlimited power of speculation. The imagination is from where "ALL" of this has come. If you want to understand a religion of AWE, look at your computer. Symmetries upon Symmetries. From the Many, We Learn As One.

SOCIAL PHYSICS and The Bias of Temperament

                   I keep going back to the original problem. How do I de mystify Psychic Reading, (Intuitive Diagnostics?) The language of science begs recreation!

                   "How do I teach people what I'm seeing?" If I'm correct, "Everyone has blind spots, and everyone's blind spots are different," Then, I'll make a "personal language for you. "Our" language is about you and much less about me.

                    It's about temperament. Identifying distinctions about you and hopefully you only. I like being able to keep a polite safe distance. Looking at peoples hands, seeing people very close up is something that has given me an exceptional power to communicate and understand people in a way that is for me a godsend. {thanx god!} The palm reading is just the perfect front end to be able to study other people, with your expressed permission. And thank you very much.

                   My level of proficiency is only because of bridging seemingly unrelated soft technologies. I've trained actively as a sensitive and find utility in accounting for the variability in different peoples temperaments.

                   I'm having a hard time explaining how the TAROT and Kaballa are both models of "Dynamic Systems." (As with all of our "Symmetric Coalescence.")  The "Modularization" of "META DATA" is the key stone of my very system. I believe that when psychics get bogged down in Astrology it's because they don't understand what the models are mapping. This is where the repetition comes in. I've said routinely "The Map Is Not The Territory."

                   In "Soft Tech," Unity is everything. You can't waste time looking around for the answers. You must know what to do when you are looking out for things that are unusual. You need to have basic characters for your typographic renderings. Human temperament can be as varied and nuanced as a Sung Dynasty Ink Wash Landscape Painting. You'll need to be quick and safe if you want to learn the territory. Most people are generally not respected and if you can communicate honestly, I believe that most people can tell. Integrity is hot.

                  I have proposed to pull off the "True Hoax" by teaching readers my Johnson Method for reading all the distinguishing details for your client's and whom ever. I believe it'll be much easier to just put the information out there and let the results speak for themselves, hopefully helping people all the way. But even this could take a while. (Still calculating.)

                 If even the two larger scale propositions don't produce concrete results in my lifetime most of these changes in social language are predictable. But once you get a clear view of distinctive variability, you get to know people with a complement. ECHO IMPRINTING and everyone does want to be recognized.

                 I just thought by teaching people to look at predictive mediums as dynamic systems, I was modeling changes in variability. Social physics is life in the matrix of probability. Come on, take that look off of your face. I know this is boring. But if I don't speak to the largest audience possible, I'm just wasting time typing in the dark. Damn it I'm your reader. (You'll be getting my bill.)  

A Living Dream "Cycles of Symmetry"

                   I share the belief that marriage is ideally a state of "Healthy Entanglement." An interpenetration of shared reality. But that can be said of life in general.

                   I find that it's really hard to explain our cultures "Sacred Idioms." I try to explain why the Tarot actually makes sense to me. I understand the data distributions. I understand the basic directional polarities of the signs in their ordering. "Sacred Idioms." have always been the most inspiring, most literal and most easy to understand parts of religion for me. Even prohibitions and taboos are sometimes based on real issues.

                   So talking about "Symbolic Language" aways comes back to that which is most sacred for each and every individual person. No where else is this issue of aesthetics, Choice, so influential and therefore important. People often worship, money, status, glamour, but when it comes to the "Sacred Symbols" people still often believe in something greater than themselves. You don't have to believe in "God" in order to still have symbols associated with that thing that other people are calling god. What the concept of god may symbolize to you is definitely not the same as it is for those other people.

                   I've come to understand that the design of a "Meta Formally Logical" model predicting the unknown outcome of events, still sounds very un plausible, for many people. I find that it generally comes from an unfamiliarity with the use of symmetry. I try to explain "Symmetrical Coalescence" It's the unintended collectivization of our "Symmetries." Map to map, symbol to meaning. Mathematicians have invented a language and theory about symmetries. Artists and readers had discovered symmetry and had to create other kinds of signs, structures and models to demonstrate the place of these "Cycles of Symmetry."

                   So I have to come up with a way to show these symmetries in language in general. The primary ordering principles (Polarities) inherent in the interpersonal dyad is an actual linguistic unit. When two people understand each other, we have a special language. A shared platform. This is that active phase of life. In larger groups we are still dealing with a lesser degree of shared language. In particularly large groups, shared languages become less meaningful for people individually. Symbols end up taking the place of actual language. Symbols, often mean opposite things, can often evoke conflicting emotions in different audiences. Symbols die harder than do languages. That is essentially the resistance people have to me being a pro psychic. It's about what this symbol means to them.

                 If, "SOME PEOPLE ARE VERY DIFFERENT VERY DIFFERENTLY,"  then, we can anticipate that even married people can still sometimes have their own opinions, contrary to the popular myth. But then again we don't just travel in straight lines, we actually go in routine circles.

Story So Far "Our Shared Unknown"

                   Let's talk about what we have already achieved. We have awareness. As readers we have the art of living fiction. I don't mean that we live fictitious lives, I mean that we tell stories that come true. When we say we are going to do something, it doesn't always mean that it's going to happen. We are committing to an action. When we approach an unknown, something happens. A story emerges. The unknown is a boundary. We are defined by boundaries. We tell stories about our boundaries. They almost always include people. We become aware of our personal and social boundaries by identification.

                    The story up to this point has been about cultivating the awareness and identification of boundaries. Social, personal, intellectual, physical boundaries. This is a literary experiment in language and documentation.

                    We have identified a type communication that is in fact influence. As we confront and define popular opinion biases, pro and con, we see that boundaries of opinion shift. This story is to help mark, and facilitate that moving shift of popular opinions.

                    Much to my surprise, I see very little work that is designed to help "Society" learn en mass. Most stories are oriented to preferentially biased markets. That's why I've insisted on not pandering to you my "Sacred Unknown Audience." I want you to all be different. If I do this right, the story takes effect without you even noticing. If this story is to become true it must be handled very delicately.

                    As your reader, I may even get to know if I've done my job correctly. You may be able to feel the gentle release from the overly familiar. There is always suspense that accompanies true learning. My job as a reader is to teach, not preach. I may even be able to teach you how to be a good reader. You are reading this story right now. And all I had to do was trust in your ability to recognize the truth when you see it, even if it is still only just another story.

                    This book is a door into "Our Shared Unknown."