I share the belief that marriage is ideally a state of "Healthy Entanglement." An interpenetration of shared reality. But that can be said of life in general.
I find that it's really hard to explain our cultures "Sacred Idioms." I try to explain why the Tarot actually makes sense to me. I understand the data distributions. I understand the basic directional polarities of the signs in their ordering. "Sacred Idioms." have always been the most inspiring, most literal and most easy to understand parts of religion for me. Even prohibitions and taboos are sometimes based on real issues.
So talking about "Symbolic Language" aways comes back to that which is most sacred for each and every individual person. No where else is this issue of aesthetics, Choice, so influential and therefore important. People often worship, money, status, glamour, but when it comes to the "Sacred Symbols" people still often believe in something greater than themselves. You don't have to believe in "God" in order to still have symbols associated with that thing that other people are calling god. What the concept of god may symbolize to you is definitely not the same as it is for those other people.
I've come to understand that the design of a "Meta Formally Logical" model predicting the unknown outcome of events, still sounds very un plausible, for many people. I find that it generally comes from an unfamiliarity with the use of symmetry. I try to explain "Symmetrical Coalescence" It's the unintended collectivization of our "Symmetries." Map to map, symbol to meaning. Mathematicians have invented a language and theory about symmetries. Artists and readers had discovered symmetry and had to create other kinds of signs, structures and models to demonstrate the place of these "Cycles of Symmetry."
So I have to come up with a way to show these symmetries in language in general. The primary ordering principles (Polarities) inherent in the interpersonal dyad is an actual linguistic unit. When two people understand each other, we have a special language. A shared platform. This is that active phase of life. In larger groups we are still dealing with a lesser degree of shared language. In particularly large groups, shared languages become less meaningful for people individually. Symbols end up taking the place of actual language. Symbols, often mean opposite things, can often evoke conflicting emotions in different audiences. Symbols die harder than do languages. That is essentially the resistance people have to me being a pro psychic. It's about what this symbol means to them.
If, "SOME PEOPLE ARE VERY DIFFERENT VERY DIFFERENTLY," then, we can anticipate that even married people can still sometimes have their own opinions, contrary to the popular myth. But then again we don't just travel in straight lines, we actually go in routine circles.
