Asserting Our New Wealth # 4

Thursday, January 30, 2014       Reposting a repost is tacky but I want to reward my readers for finding the tasty bits and it helps everyone catch up. (Mommy, are we there yet?)     From: Sunday, September 22, 2013

                                                          
                         I am going to attempt to demonstrate that information is the only real form of viable currency today. The irony of this statement is that many of us live in graduate school ghettoes.

                        New Core Concept: We are going to construct;  "INFLUENCE MATRICES." In tracking and generating the dissemination of new information we observe the lines and vectors of influence. This simple phenomena can be observed as the transformative medium of truth. Let's demonstrate.

                        How many of you had ever heard of an Opinion Bias before reading my blog? Even fewer of you had ever considered that the opinion bias is a shifting system dynamic. As we communicate, we generate and disseminate information. As we listen and learn new things, our opinions can change. I used to the think the Catholic church was never going to change. I'm so glad to be wrong. Interestingly enough, even my research told me I was wrong.

                        As information is generated and disseminated into groups and society, even this sways opinion. And not always in a uniform fashion, we often observe upheavals and discontinuities in the mass proliferation of "TRUTH." We started here with something relatively unimportant like psychic reading, so as to observe and model for this demonstration of the transforming influence of the truth. Invariably, we have observed several of these "Shock Values," of transformative truth. (The term shock values is borrowed from differential calculus to describe the abrupt acceleration of a rate of change as it jumps out of a linear continuity. This type of change creates, "Shock Values," as they are often unexpected and unpredictable, as a linearly continuous change decomposes into a differential point set, as the it approaches it's infinite limit.) We don't always anticipate an accelerating rate of change. It is therefore not necessary for me to try to persuade you, I find it much easier, (and more fun,) to just inspire and entertain. Hence the itinerary of the consummate entertainment medium. And this is how it is done. (Is this shocking enough for you?) Let us follow up on the results of our findings.

                       As our society has encountered and assimilated new accelerating transcultural influences, we have come to adapt to rapid change. Advances in diet, medicine, language, politics and even faith are transforming culture as we speak. People will have to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century. But that is neither your job or mine. Let the truth speak for itself. It is our new wealth.

An Ocean of Desires # 3

From; Sunday, October 27, 2013

                         What are these little essays in the face of the real problems of the world? We are confronted with an ocean of desires. Love is deep enough to encompass our world in solutions.

                         Tyrants still try to exploit, starve and oppress our peoples, and our children are denied quality educations. The environment is still being polluted. The carbonation of our oceans, {CO2} is making sea water too acidic to sustain coral in our beautiful dying seas. Love is so big it embrace everything in the whole world, dissolved with an ocean of desires. Sometimes it seems impossible to express, but are we aren't giving up. Desire is a very good thing. We want to hold on to what is good. "Desire is what keeps everything in it's place." (Quoted from my teacher, Steve.) Apathy about the world, is much worse than Heroine. Much worse.

                         I had a friend who insisted, we will all be dead in three years. This is not the first time he threw his doomsaying in my face. In principle I can agree, things are really bad. But as I had first said to him decades ago, (when he was wrong the first times,)  "The world goes out with a whimper, not a bang." Quotation not mine. (C. S. Lewis? Gertrude Stein? T. S. Elliot? I don't remember.) Theoretically, we could already be too late. But that's not what I see, thirty years ago or today. I love people and so I believe in us.

                         I reject the Apocalypse. I write about a future I have seen, rational people will want to see proof that we are going to survive together. I love beautiful undiscovered truth. But what to do about so much suffering? These problems are not going away on their own. Only the proof of our love can help us to survive.

                         So,   "Never take away hope." (Quote from my Secretary) The fact is that my pessimistic friend had been VERY WRONG in the past. Is he going to be wrong this time? Any comfort I derive from his skewed intuitions is hollow. Not just because these problems aren't going away, but because a "Let It Be" attitude is what has gotten us into these problems in the first place. There is real evil in the world. And therefore, complacency is much worse than Heroin. That "Let It Be" attitude is one of the worst philosophies that has ever perverted our otherwise reversible shared fate.

                         I know I sound foolish insisting that, "Hardships change us for the better." And that a sudden "end of the world" would be much too good for us." But my instincts have been entirely correct up too this point, and maybe my visions of the future are right too. For those of us who suffer from liberal guilt, we feel responsible for the suffering in our world. And I believe that even this must have some positive good. Let's go back to shifting mutually defined opinion biases. I think our work makes a difference.

                        Did Mark change my opinions? No bloody way!!!!! I still believe our species will solve this problem the same way we are healing the Ozone Layer. Did I change Mark's opinions? I certainly don't think so. That's not my problem anyways. "Societies General Opinion Biases change faster than do peoples Individual Personal Opinion Biases."  A much younger friend of mine says, "Popular paranoia isn't as prevalent in youth culture today as it was in decades past." Fascism isn't as fashionable anymore. Hell, most of the old farts who are responsible for the evils of the world will be dead soon anyways. But may our love prevail, I hope, live and pray.

More on the "Mutually Inclusive Negative Double Opinion Bias" # 2

                 
                   This six word term, "Mutually Inclusive Negative Double Opinion Bias" was first posted in 2009 as part of, "My Interview With A Psychic." <ppireadings.blogspot.com> Session #2. I was intending to describe the way people with conflicting opinions sometimes share popular prejudices for essentially the same reasons. Atheistic "Rational Positivists" like to think all Psychics are phony and dangerously deluded. Christians, Moslems and Jews often give me the same attitude for essentially the same reasons. Irony being, they often don't even see the commonality of their shared (though understandable,) prejudice. This is one of the things that turned me on to "Complementarity." If people who conflict, can share common illusions based on "Reasonable" objections, then how common is the need for diplomacy and tact when we must confront popular, but incorrect opinions.

                   My friend Bill, who interviewed me, once said "Do we tolerate intolerance?" The correct answer is always no! But I must also confess that in the case of the understandable doubts that most people can have about Psychics, it is largely a matter of debate that reflects changing cultural dynamics rather than just bigotry. If you read yesterdays repost on "Echo Imprinting" you saw my early clumsy attempt at explaining this core principle. It's actually a very apt concept about our latent intelligence, used for all the different identification variables that we are aware of, but often without our conscious knowing. The sound of a persons voice, the look of their eyes, their subtle distinctive smell, their style, movements and mannerisms, etc. When I'm looking at someones hands, signatures or doing massage therapy, that persons distinctiveness impresses itself into my consciousness, even without my intent. But I can't expect people to understand what I am actually doing as a Psychic that gives inside information about each and every person.

                    It is not surprising to me that I'm confronted with an understandable intolerance, coming from conflicting camps. It is a little redundant for me to make light of this but, this is essentially why I've made bringing this work to the general public my duty. I believe that if I am able to displace the naive prejudices that people have about psychics, I may also be able to make this more popular through writing a best seller. Such a high goal, though seemingly unrealistic, is not so far fetch when considering the ever shifting opinion biases in society. Doctors now days are far more curious about my work in diagnostics and healing.

                    I suspect my friends comment on "Session #2. if I catch his drift is to point out that much of the confusion about such strong opinions is that, just because something (Like Psychic Reading,) isn't always good, doesn't mean that it is always bad. This is why I always advocate for a little diplomacy when it comes to such controversial practices. I've used my best researching and analysis skills to help extricate this complex, historically significant subject from it's husk of dis-information.

That Flower of Symmetrical Coalescence {Post # 3}

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

 

                                             That Flower of Symmetrical Coalescence

                          Good evening. As the cycles of time come round on them selves we see the models for human diversity coalesce into a symmetrical flower. I was quite happy to look up, Bloom's "TAXONOMY" in Wikipedia. It is designed to look like a 6 petaled flower. Just like; The 12 Astrological Signs/ Months/Hours <12 parts> The Eneagram <9 petals>, The Chinese Five Element System <5 petals>, The 4 Temperaments or Directions <4 parts>,  and so on, all of these models have a kind of modular symmetry. Each of the individual parts are similar in form and function.

                          We start with that original division of comparing one thing to another. Yang to Yin, larger to smaller, male to female, bottom to top and so forth. From that first pairing we go from a single point to a line connecting the two points. Adding another point we come to three points which forms a surface. A forth point added to our set, if it is out of the plane of the first three points our model goes from just an area to an actual volume. With a 5th dimension we go from the substance and it's form next to motion and time. {Elementary Caballa, 101} and so on. {Check Crowley's NAPLES ARRANGEMENT in the "BOOK OF THOTH.}

                          Such is the case for any analysis of a multi-variant statistic. With each new variable we add an extra dimension. Every time we are comparing more than just a couple of different variables we are creating progressively more possible combinations of variety. We as people really are this interesting. Knowing about all these detailed differences between different people is easier to understand if we are oblivious to statistical analysis and the calculus of variation involving huge numbers. This is why I have avoided trying to bring up this very heavy issue of human variability until now.

                          This is the key to understanding "Meta Formal Logic." Each unity, (a person, the sky, the earth, the seasons, time, the family, etc,) are all divided equally. {By the process I call, an "Enumerate Partition."} And then all of these individualized parts are drawn back together again as the reunified totality. {Here we come to what I have come to describe as, the "Symmetrical Coalescence."}

                          Why these conventions have remained consistent throughout human history, I really can't say. But fortunately for those of us with a respect for unanswered questions these tools have great utility. And frankly I really can't imagine measuring something as abstract as time any other way.

                          I must confess that for all of the information I'm writing here on this infinite scroll, You, My discriminating readers are scrutinizing the blog and focusing in on central theme. I believe this document will be much easier to read in hard copy edited to be read from the beginning. But of course re editing will make the final draft

Syncretism and Syzygy / Tuning Into Our Parallel Universes {Post # 2}

Thursday, July 10, 2014

                   Everything I've written about so far in this blog has been about the grand Symmetrical Coalescence. Everything has come together. You may still be fighting and fussing. The fact is that you maybe don't agree with me and that I'm not worrying about your opinions. Welcome to my world. I never asked for your permission other than that I try to apprehend how to best share my work on "Para Psychological Methods."

                   I have also relied heavily on diagrams and models to help demonstrate the existence of higher order symmetries using exotic manifolds and differential fields. I suspect that these occurrences or "Syzygies" are apt metaphors of these often unanticipated structures latent in computational and numerical spaces. I spend an immense amount of time studying the advances in Physics so I may be able to learn about the possibility of an "Energetic Neuro Physics." My explanation of things like "Sensitive Boundaries" and "Perceptual (Opinion) Biases" may seem too theoretical to bother with, but if I am correct then there will be plenty of people who will be able to find the empirical evidence, besides just me. As a "Systems Dynamic" it will be easy to prove or disprove. But people will still fuss and fight anyways.

                    As I continue to reexamine many decades of study and worship, I have been privileged. I am reminded of the "Conjugate." That which is defined by the other, and in essence does not exist without the other. In Math there are even objects which exist only by order of mutual transformation. This is the world I see.

Heuristics and Algorithms in Psychic Reading Technologies {Post #2}

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

                   I take great pleasure in watching the behavior of the market research algorithms used to target advertising over the web. I'm one of those geeks who is pleasantly insulated by my limited interests. I only use you tube for music and the ads are directed by my use of all three of my browsers although I rarely overlap any one browser's specific use. I never use the web for searches. Similarly, my g + account grasps nothing of the real content of my blogs, when it tries to tag me. I love the music I get to hear and I resultantly post links to g +. As much as I complain about the arbitrary nature of the quirks designed into almost all over engineered software, sometimes the interactive elements of the lower layers of processing entertain me to no end. I believe that the notion of "Usability" is the biggest hoax perpetuated by the "Economy of Scale" and mass consumer marketing, I understand the real problems confronting interactions of business departments with design tech. This is in fact from where almost all problems of mass marketing derive. We should want to be able to believe in what we are selling. When we look at business in terms of a heuristic, (Games Theory) we come up against that inevitable threshold of uncertainties.

                   Point is, market research algorithms try to approximate my customer potential, by trying to predict what I may want to buy. (Sounds like just another psychic to me.) I too am always guessing at what a client may want to hear from me, fully aware of all the moral hazards that accompany psychic reading, intuitive diagnostics and the speculative arts in general. As much as I have already written on the subject of business consultation, I as of yet have little awareness of how many of my clients and readers truly understand what it is I have been talking about. Making comparisons between something as low rent and throw away as psychic reading with the other high dollar speculative arts like diagnostics, systems analysis, medicine, law, economics, and worst of all politics, has made me the "Web Pariah." I am confronted with the horrible moral crisis that every ethical consultant should have to consider, and yet I'm supposed to be the lightweight. Uncertainties abound in the worlds of business, medicine, the sciences, law, finance, and again worst of all, "That dark art of Politics." There are no guaranties, and most of the time you don't even get your money back.

                  One of the main reasons I am despised by most so called psychics is that I don't pretend to be psychic. I am an artist. I work with checklists, processing loops, palettes, and many more ways of departitioning exhaustive memory. (I still find it amazing that my blogger software likes to tell me that there is no such word as departioning, as if an authoritative arbiter on the correct usage of spelling in grammar.) Contrary to popular prejudice, being deemed correct need not ever be the same thing as being truthfully honest. In procedural analysis often times we may want to see barriers to understanding removed. Resultantly, "We may speak truthfully, but are not heard." That is not the fault of heuristics. Man is not just a "Rational Thinking Machine," we must also understand how we are individually stroked. This fine art of understanding may not be reducible to an algorithm. I feel we may have covered this topic for today. Thank you for your attention.

Inter Sensory Sensitivities and Familial Bonding {Post #2}

Sunday, May 11, 2014

                   Critique, as a social skill, is a necessary requirement for bonding. Knowing how we identify and recognize each other is always happening mutually. Modesty (Grooming?) in most cultures usually involves an admission of vulnerability, by covering up in some way. We not only want to be recognized, even if in quiet obscurity, but we also have a need to be able to recognize everyone else too. Our culture's obsession with appearances has made us prissy and self conscious. Gossip or not. We all fill out some kind of a social profile, often of our own design. One of the perks of being the "pro psychic" is that I'm trained to be respectful and gentle. We all will try to open ourselves to the truth (whatever that might be), sooner or later. Our desire for denial is something that has only a limited shelf life. So the desire for knowledge about a person's own karma is usually why people to come to me. I'm not qualified to judge anyone, ever! I just happen to know it very, very well.

                   But for a fee, "I will tell someone what even their own relatives wont say to them. And I am very supportive about it, making everyone look great in the process. Learning to be the astute observer of people has caused me to want to find humility and respect, two words I am unworthy to use. This ability to focus our attentions on any other person is critical to the development of all significant shared experiences. Our shared physical and emotional space is filled with the constant exchange of information, back and forth. If I touch you, you may feel me, and vice versa, simple. We are always in a process of "Shared" reality, it's why we need these incredibly big brains. Only be virtue of interpersonal (and Inter Sensory) contact do we have so much to offer each other. We must go through so much of what it is we need to learn together. Daily life can be subtle. The daily life is also complex. The daily life can be dangerous or absurd, or even boring. Identifying peoples individual signature behavior is the key to working in shared emotional spaces. Without these deep preverbal sensitivities the whole point of our individual awarenesses would be lost. The uniqueness of our individuality is critical to our sense of self, at least superficially.

                   An overexposed, "No Boundaries" world view needs a human touch. Even social criticism today has taken on a life of it's own. Public mockery has become the media staple of todays Reality Programming. But fortunately standards are always changing, whether anyone really changes or not. Perceived commonalities can often just be the cultural labels, be they public or personally intimate. Shared experiences may be a non verbal currency of emotional relations. From within our shared contexts of Personal and Group Identities (Roles, duties and obligations), we learn our language for relatedness. As creatures of shared language, Self Reflection can only show us so much. A Seer is a reader of oracles. Putting the correct (alternative?) perspective on a problem set is much more supportive than just being critical, or worse yet apathetic. Point is, as a reader, I want to be able to give you the best product I can. You may find that my friendliness, and my familiarity with my work may help to take some of the sting out of having to go under that microscope of examination. My work with people can be like a very gentle stress test. In the psychic examination, by looking at your hands, your writing, your eyes, I also listen for your voice. I'm not going to criticize, but in that moment I do follow you very closely. Then when I get to the sought after information, I'll take over and read. Otherwise I try to mind my own business. That's it. Usually I don't need to cheat.