I'm going to keep going, I understand perfectly that up to this point my little experiment is designed to withstand failure. As reason demands a continuous closure, we embrace the probable to eliminate the lies and correct the falsehoods that take place in our ever growing personal experience and knowledge.
On this core subject of Psychic Reading I've outlined many of the basic methodologies. I have explained my own use of Meta Formal Logic as the base means of accounting for the practice of the "Enumerate Partition" of abstract quantities, which informed these ancient processes of rudimentary analysis. Astrology is mom to Astronomy, Stellar Cartography, Navigation . Physiology was preceded by another Meta Formal ancient Intuitive Diagnostic, where again we see abstract quantities uniformly divided up into Meridians in Chinese Medicine. (More Clockwork) The philosophical end table is the modular ancient Chinese Meta Science which "Symmetrically Coalesced" into our "I Ching, the Book of Changes." Through the mass literacy of the traditional Jewish Culture we get to witness the coming of an alphabet of symbols translated from the Torah into the Talmud, to the Sefer ha Zohar, to most strangely the "TAROT." From tiny pieces of evenly divided maps, the language of actual modern medical palmistry is as difficult as any. We only have to look at the elegant complexities of hand writing and uncial fonts to catch a glimpse of what I'm looking at when I'm first reading for someone. Those are a very short list of the tools I have to work from. Today I'm attempting to outline the traditions that have come together to become our modern practices of Intuitive Diagnostics and more casually Fortunetelling.
:Why would such arbitrarily simplistic ways of partitioning data end up producing sound scientific foundations that just needed to be corrected. Two issues.
1st. The shear overwhelming volume of the kinds of information we have at our disposal requires huge lexicons. Order demands simplicity. We have to start somewhere. Partitioning an informational space into a "Unity" divided equally by vectors, was the only way to find a "Basis" for the language of "Self." We have the "Local Symmetries" of "Perceptual Orientation," and "Rotations and Angularity." This gives us our shared language of place, perspective, variability and differentiation. I'm up, your down, right left, backwards forwards, successions, inter relations going on into moving boundaries. Language has to be simplified in order to keep up.
2nd. So much of what we learn about each other happens at the very deep level of preverbal sensitivities. "Echo Imprints" maybe all we have to distinguish why we feel what we feel about each other as an individually uniqued people. And yet at any point that awareness of distinctiveness is so undeniable for most everybody. The Penguins on the beach are rarely confused about "Positive I. D." The parents are looking out for their baby chick, even though all penguins look the same to me.
This ancient practice of dividing down data sets according to "Local Symmetries" and by "Enumerate Partitions" reconstruct to become many of the "Coalesced," soft technologies that we can still learn from today. As the psychic I've become skilled at surfing the boundary between ignorant superstition and arrogant intellectual bigotry. (They are blood brothers.) The truth still lies between.
New Subject; CRITICAL SENSITIVITIES
This process of interpersonal differentiation is critical, even though it is largely understated behind the courtesy of belonging. But even the boundaries of Identification come with distinctions. This is where we get our "Proxy Dependencies." This is how we can mutually identify ourselves and therefore we take on the language and perspectives of "Group."
Even from within our group come separate awarenesses, each one of us will have our own unique sensitivities which may make us critical of each other. Grooming is a most beneficial expression of this co supportive mutual sensitivity. The awareness of personal differences is critical for the survival of said individuals and group. Look to the relations and relative distance. People are both object (1.) and subjects (multiple). Mutual boundary definitions are often as arbitrary as are astrological signs and sometimes say nothing about a persons true nature at all. Not all women are dependent. Not at all, but it is a popular myth even today, that women are supposed to be "Weak." It is often only by distinct critical sensitivities that people become more than a label. Our human capacity for expression is not just for "Signatures of Identification" but also serves to communicate differences of personal critical sensitivities.
