Social Linking Phenomena

                        This page should have been about "pastimes," shared experiences, and beliefs. I want to show you the shape of your social data. As much as your taste in music and types of food do give you a shared frame of reference, we are defined by so much more. I'ld like to focus on what it is that I can give you. Sensitivity to style takes energy. It is the expression of energy that you respond to. If you choose to want to train yourself, WE ARE TRAING YOU TO BE PSYCHIC. This will take you to a place of exceptional  exposure. Style is always an energetic proposition. Sorry, it's the truth.

                        When we get  to understand our bonds of interaction between all people, we must consider having limited emotional resources. Each of us has only so much energy we can use before we get burned out. One could suggest that emotions are nothing more than energetic fields. But emotions are very slippery and understanding them is not easy. My argument is not with the absurdity of emotions but with the difficulty we have making sense out of them. Something that is emotional, acts as both a signaling and immunological barrier. But emotions as a conscious subjective resource are much more important. (Did I say everybody's emotions are different?)

                        It was necessary to come up with a way of mapping out these peculiarities of the emotional fields. We have also lived in, ({Soft spots} well mapped,) a shared language of subjectivity. We rarely use it. These emotional resources are easily qualifiable by the examination of the body. Language is critical. I'm sorry for being clinical about it. It is essential that I find and use an understandable language for describing and detailing the subjective. We have literally a shape to our awareness, (Perceptual Ordination/The shape of our individual senses.) An emotional field is just one example. There is also a kinesthetic boundary of awareness (Touch, Taste and Smell), a visual range of perception and even equilibrium for balance (A Sense of Place), that all can be experienced subjectively at the same time, (that's a lot.) As subjective awarenesses have no material substance, we have only our bodies to speak for our awareness.

                       Mirroring someone is one way of defining shared emotional space. Just imitating someone, however isn't always a compliment. There are also many other ways of defining boundaries of awareness, (Conflict Resolution, Neurolinguistics, Active Listening.) Most of my work always seems to come down to defining boundary conditions. There is the boundary of self. There are also boundaries of contact. As well, there are group identities and "Self Defined Boundaries of Distinction," (mostly defined by social identification, membership or groups. {i,e. I am a boy, white, I am a gym rat, I like girls, etc.)

                        Most of our daily emotional resources can be used up everyday, just like needing to eat or sleep. If  we are not able to recharge our emotional budget, we can experience life like someone who is hungry or tired. There are so many different factors to our daily needs. Life was very different for our ancestors. They experienced much emotional pain and grief. Since then, infant mortality has dropped in this country steadily. The Industrial Revolution and immigration has helped to bring millions of my fellow citizens to the U.S. People have come to live much longer here in the states. Emotional variables have continued to change for each generation, especially for those of us who are employable and enjoy longer lives. Unlike most of us, many of our ancestors lived through much more difficulty. Life is still hard for everyone, but they had to deal with grief as a consequence of almost daily living. There are many people alive today who are still living with war and poverty.

                        When I look at your hand I'm seeing your family history. It's not in my interpretation of the hand. Partly because of the mythological significance of palm reading, most people have never really looked at their own hands. Much less do we inspect and examine each others. There are still places where you could be killed for being a palm reader. Start with eye training. Just look. I know what I'm asking.

                        If you decide to start doing this you will have little difficulty looking at hands. Cut yourself a lot of slack here especially at the beginning. Most people will want a palm reading. And I do mean everyone. It may be worth it for you, simply for that surprise of uncertainty.  That joy of wonder. No answers, just clear understanding. Oh come on, I know you can do this. People will love you when you make what you say the truth.  Come on. I want to hear you say it. "I Don't Know."

                       I want so much to make this easy and understandable. PEOPLE WANT TO BE RECOGNIZED. And you will never know what it's like until you start to do it. The books are just a way to see what you can look for. Interpretation is something learned by exposure. People will be showing a lot more than they realize. They will be thinking about their fate line. You"ll be looking at size, shape, texture, coloring, depth, sensitivity, subtle motion. This is a lot easier with time. Your resources allow you to absorb that distinctiveness for each person. and interpret what you see. As a reader you don't have to be right. You must be sensible. PEOPLE WANT TO BE RECOGNIZED.

The Aesthetics of Science

                         Please forgive me for posting unfinished pages, I find assertions, like red wine need time to breathe. Such are the aesthetics of science. If we want to understand that beautiful dance around the "Void of Content," approaching the unknown we must consider our choices. On this most practical level we all make decisions based on our preferences, desires and aesthetics. Yes it's true. This search for truth can be absolutely beautiful. More soon.

                         If you are reading this, you probably have opinions that are as distinctive as a fingerprint or a signature. Just like your little quirks, hangups and even your unique "Styles of Evasion."
                         (Reposted from #3. Some People Are Very Different, Very Differently. April 25th, 2013)  
                         {At this point I would like to enumerate four "Styles of Evasion."}

              1.  Active deception, Showing Off, Lying, Phonyness, Bragging, Exaggeration, Hyperbole,  etc.
              2.   Spacing out, Disengagement, Withdrawal, Omission, Vagueness, Aloofness, etc.
              3.   Condescension, Put downs, Dismissal,  Negation, Passive Aggression, etc.
              4.  Over Compartmentalization, Inaccessibility, Burnout, Over Conscientiousness etc.

          You probably recognize any or all of these evasions in yourself and or others.  Some more than others.  I'm showing the ways we confront or avoid the stresses of uncertainty. When in doubt, learned styles of evasion take over.  A little Meta Formally Logical diagram to demonstrate;

                                                                    2. Spacing Out
                                                         1. Lying       +      3. Condescension
                                                                    4. Burnout

          At the center of this diagram is the uncertainties we all can evade, just in our own way.  You will notice the symmetry and the two axis of polarity. Openness to these uncontrolled uncertainties is the mark of a truly open person. It is almost impossible to be open all the time. We have these evasions hardwired into our survival instincts. The next time you see someone being evasive, consider the source. They/We maybe feeling vulnerable.

          The two axis are; Horizontally,  Positive Misrepresentation of fact on the left side and the Negative Misrepresentation of emotions on the right side.     
                                       Vertically, Passive Evasion of responsibility on top and the Active Evasion of irresponsibility on the bottom.}

          The melding of genotypes with the peculiarly unrepeatable conditions for each person's life can never be duplicated. The science and math of a multivariate analysis of these kinds of variations are in fact some of the most cumbersome calculations known to computation. Just know that when we evade, we use energy and that any real sensitive will know it. Show a little empathy. This is where we get to show a little tact.

                         When our self reflections are done without an understanding of the commonalities of the human experience, we often feel very alone. Everyone does. But It has been said, (I don't remember exactly where, maybe it was me,) "Our personal problems all have a public dimension." This is obvious when we are confronted with shifts in bias as is the case of changing popular opinions. (Author's Message!)

                         I must admit that my writing has become too heavy. No fault of mine, such is my love. I doubt there is any other way to report the detailed sensitivity of my work. I need to be as truthful as I can possibly be. Who would have thought that gravitas could cause an informational black hole. This is one of those things that no one will believe until they can look for themselves. We are seeing the beginning of an educational event horizon. Possibly my work will not escape this informational undertow. Only those in the distant future will ever know I'm right about: "Preverbal Ordering Principles," "Coding Density Thresholds" and "Echo Imprinting." By then, my work will probably have been lost, as generally happens for most people. No big deal. But I could be very wrong, in many, many ways. Please forgive me.

Who Is the Spaminator

                         Now that events have eliminated most of the false subscribers, "you" are the only remaining readers who have chosen to continue reading for now. If you yourself have been able to find the reading materials I've recommended, you may have seen my personal bias for historical accuracy. As the whole point of my work is the understanding of symbolic language, it has been a privilege to be able to appeal to the most academic of psychics. I do feel a little badly about screening out questionable traffic sources by ignoring the spam they have been trying to use to entice me. But they should have the choice of deciding for themselves whether they want to keep me on as a free content blog provider.

                         I have just checked for what actually happened to the traffic source, "The Tao of Badass" and as they have said in their seduction video offer, it was a limited time only offer. The website is no more. Classic "Games Theory." (Basic premise, "You know you want it." "So your going to pay for it." But I didn't want it. And I certainly didn't ask.) But it still leaves me wondering why and how so many in Russia were using their commercial website to access my blog. But unless I'm contacted, I'll never know why. What a strange compliment. I'm still occasionally being read via their other website for weight loss through applied games theory. Interesting stuff, if you don't believe in yourself you will not achieve your goals. But that's just a good place to start. I like "Games Theory," but that is it's problem, it's theory. And although attitude is critical, it's almost harder to maintain attitude than it is your weight or sex appeal. Such is the power of faith, (and it's limitation.) Mind control is not something that everyone has, nor can it be marketed as a consistent product. That's why I never make promises or take advantage of peoples gullibility. No matter how tempting I wont sell false hope even when I know it may be the only thing that works. That drive for "Authoritation By Proxy," is so great for most people, that it is inevitable that people accuse me of being a con artist brainwashing the foolish and weak minded. It's OK to give your money to a stock adviser or a political campaign. It's acceptable to believe in cranky doctors or criminal attorneys, but I still prefer to let people make their own choices. I realize the sacrifice, but I stay out of trouble. Peace out.

Lies About Misanthropes

                         One of my pleasures in study and research has been busting myths, (this one is unspoken.) One of these most destructive myths is our tendency to judge and divide people by type. Case in point. Misanthropy is nothing more than a variable of temperament. Not all misanthropes are un loving. People don't choose to be clannish either. And even then, misanthropes don't necessarily hate, they just don't care for people. Including themselves, these often wonderful people will sometimes be able to speak their minds without concern for everyones fragile emotions. This is something I don't do, and sometimes I wish I did. What I gain through kindness, I pay for with a total lack of passion and warmth. I too am very loving, but without healthy attachment. You win some and loose some. But understanding constructive polarity is always a winner.

                          Please don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that misanthropes are incapable of empathy or dignified self restraint. I'm asserting that being a zenophile comes with overwhelming baggage. And until I understood the importance of this grossly misunderstood difference, I was in agony. Judging myself harshly for crippling scruples, I have had little choice but to learn why everyone isn't like me. Those who are the most different share in the extreme. My friends are good people, but only about half of them are actual misanthropes. My mom was a misanthrope. She said, "You really care about people, and that's good." "But I don't." "I don't even care for my self." Hence the talk, she went on, "People's concerns are in fact for themselves only."

                          I said, "As they should be. Any concern we have about another person is in fact an extension of the love we have for ourselves."

                          The opposite of zenophilia is not misanthropy, it's xenophobia. Most people who are misanthropes would be much closer to being what I would call zenophrenic, (my invented word for, "conflicted about people in general.") Even as an involuntary zenophile I too can have dread toward other people. I just care a lot that's all. When my nervous system isn't shorting out I see the radiance of the human soul in each and every person. But some days I too feel really ugly towards strangers. But I do "always" care deeply. I love all people deeply. I've never had any choice in the matter. (I am a cup bubbling over.") Even when I feel bitter and hostile, it's always easy for me to want take other peoples feelings into consideration. I don't even have to think about it. If everyone was like me we would all starve to death out of courtesy. Thank God, (if there is a god,) for all of the angry functional misanthropes. God created misanthropes and atheists and all those other people whose enlightened selfishness is so different from me. I see everyones point of view. Thy skepticism nourishes me. Thy severity maketh my path clear of self deception. Thy criticism toughens my skin. Thy evasion quickens my step. Thy obsession with death keepeth my heart pure and unpolluted from attachment. Thy fear of death doth maketh my job of guiding you into the beyond a privilege few can ever know. Your fear of God only makes my love deeper. Thank God not everyone is like me.

                          If you search, zenophile, you can come to a well established group of committed bloggers advocating challenging xenophobia in all it's forms. A new approach has been to create a dialog, literally a new language of inclusion, including everyone. This language of inclusion means we seek to understand, everyone,.......without exception. I myself have had the privilege of seeing this process at work in my own studies and practice. I'm a little embarrassed to admit, I love you and I have no idea who you are. Weird. I have no idea where this is going.

                       

More Meta Formal Conventions Partitioning Data

                          For the sake of brevity we must start in on Caballa {sp.}(Jewish/Christian Mysticism. As in this example we have the three pillars of: Mercy, Mildness and Severity. Similar to the Ida, Kundalini and Pingali. (Hindu,)Satva [Fire{"+"}<PITA>], Chi [Air{"+"&"-"}<VATA>] and Ananda [Water{"-"}<KAPH>). (Chinese,)Yang(Positive), Yan (Neutral{the Tao}) and of course Yin (Negative). Qualitatively, you will learn to be able to make distinctions based on comparative differences between people and their temperaments on the basis of these similar differences. Much more to come......

                           These Pillars have names. They are parts of the tree of life. The Sephir Yetzera (I'll have to check Spelling and all,) is the text that outline the Sephiris (Plural). These are the spheres of contact that manifest reality in our existence. This is an Implicit model of creation that has 7 attributes of God that can be comprehended by man. Ten in total spheres are identified, graphed and wrote about extensively. These divine maps simultaneously represent the spiritual history of the holy Torah and the creative spiritual life of God and People. The living text has a body. This blueprint is called the "Adam Kadmon." We are supposedly created in the divine image of that body of the word. The Wife is said to be the "Torah" in that the woman is the spiritual manifestation of the feminine spirit of God {Shekina}, in her home as well as her marriage. In the name of Jehova, (spelled Yod, Heh, Vav, Heh, in Hebrew,) we have the original balance of God as masculine and feminine. These correspondently are depicted in the Tarot as the four suits of: Clubs (male), Hearts (female), Spades (boy) and Diamonds (girl). There has been much talk of freeing this "exiled" female manifestation of God with the return to paradise. (Talk about a  lot of pressure. Oy.) I have loved my time studying the history and traditions of Jewish mysticism.

SUBTEXT That Which Doesn't Get Said

                         As I examine the Wikipedia, it's very limited documents on palmistry, and especially it's talk page, I'm especially impressed by the call for a "consensus." There is also an absence of accounts for the variability of the different traditional schools of interpretation. As well the conspicuous "Void of Content" is a proof of the gap between practice and philosophy, dooming the dialog to mutual disagreement. No real attempt has been made to analyze the "Opinion Biases." The notion of "Pseudoscience" is flagged, promoting the usual propaganda about "Cold Reading," when the prospect of educated (informed?) guessing is blamed for the untrustworthy analysis of "psychics." WOW! I must confess that I have also always sympathized with these objections to palmistry. But my intention to embrace a "Complementarity" is because, I WANT INFORMATION. Not simplistic generalizations, pro or con. {The expected utility of the proposed quantum computing will be able to handle the larger scale calculations of facial recognition software and all the other Nth order multi variate statistics. Will our minds be able to keep up with these very reasonable requests for information?

                         I've made a few basic assertions, like the four basic propositions of "The Para Psychological Methods."(#1. A PERSON"S GUESS IS ALWAYS BETTER THAN ODDS WOULD ALLOW, April 23rd, 2013) Which though deceptively simplistic, these may prove to be the only way I can prove by statistical analysis, the falsifiability of the pre-eminent concept of "pseudo-science." (The concept of "pseudoscience" does not rise above it's own deductive criteria of "non-falsifiability." The concept proof of "pseudoscience" is in itself, "pseudoscientific" in this most arbitrary way. It proves itself wrong by it's own absolute over generalization.)

                         The dialog on the subject of "Opinion Bias," has for too long been dominated by the abuse of "Subtext." This is most often carried out through the subterfuge of an elite spiritually abusive few, controlling the dialog by deciding what is allowed to be said. This is how arguments are polarized by partisan religion, and pretentiously dogmatic belligerent science. We are often silenced by mockery. Cloistered with baseless viral statements, memes and party lines. Our healthy survival instincts can understandably end up being used against us, negating our will to communicate.  We have all become shy introverts. Of those of us with the intelligence to form personal opinions, we are marginalized. For instance, I find myself wondering if I haven't lost all of the Russian readers to the weight of politically expedient popular biases. The web has been criminalized in many countries. It may simply not be possible for me to reach those thousand plus readers who may never be able to come back to reading this blog. It may be too late and there isn't much I can do.

                         But as this book is ultimately designed to be re-drafted into a book form, hopefully, if and when the book may prove that "The True Hoax," (May 23rd, 2013) is actually substantiated, the book will still become accessible. As I have suggested, I am going to continue to alternate the documentation of pertinent information with these occasional narratives. This may make my own subtext more approachable.

                         With your advancement into "Eye Training," "Ear Training" and "Voice Training," (and hopefully "Touch Training," if and when we get the time for this most basic of diagnostic resource,) you yourself will be able to more clearly identify "SUBTEXT." I had originally planned to use the notion of subtext as a way to describe unspoken, often unintentional behavior which precludes and substitutes for communication. To Go Where Words Dare Not Enter  (July 14th, 2013) & DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY  (June 28th, 2013) Good luck and best wishes. If you have been able to read between the lines, I'm trying to say much that I prefer to leave to you, the readers to figure out in your own good time. You may have already noted my "Subtext."

                       

Redirect Back to the Philosophy

                         I suspect that as I've lost close to a thousand readers for my blog, this may be a great time to redirect our attention back to the philosophy. There will be plenty of time to fill in the details. The relevant books are out there and although Wikipedia has put out requests for volunteers to help them with their history and science documentation, I'm inclined to think most of us will need help with our more basic human relations skills. This is at least as important than the dry data.

                        The traffic source that was sending my blog to eastern Europe may not want to carry me anymore. I suspect their initial interest was due to my work on the dynamics and polarity of the reading model. This is a natural extension of the human relations dichotomy. As I mentioned they seem to be the same company that markets games theory based seminars for meeting woman and such. Loved the attention while I got it, but I probably hadn't earned the access to the Russian readership.

                        Let's stick to the subject. In Chinese philosophy the Taoists are known for their respect for the balance of Male and Female, Yang & Yin, Light & Shade, Warm & Cool. This essential "Diametric" is integral to understanding Chinese medicine and diagnostics. No where has the sophistication of Meta Formal Logic provided such well accepted and practiced methodology. Although here in the west Acupuncture is becoming an accepted medical adjunct to western medicine, yet it is still not understood, and interestingly enough it is still considered Pseudoscience simply because it contradicts western scientific philosophy. Yet what Chinese medicine and diagnostics lack simplistically it makes up for with thoroughness. The five element mandala can be laid out on a five pointed star, with the elements of;
                                      ELEMENTS                  YIN ORGAN                  YANG VICERA
                                      Fire                                 Heart                                Small Intestine
                                      Water                              Kidneys                           Bladder
                                      Earth                               Speen/Pancreas                Stomach
                                      Wood                              Liver                                Gall Bladder
                                      Metal                               Lungs                              Large Intestine
 Or the elements can be laid out as a cross with the Earth element in the center. We'll see another example of this arrangement when we get to the Tibetan mandala for the realms of attachment in the afterlife. The central primary realm is in the center of the diagram. Look at the Yin Yang Mandala. These energies are all interconnected and circulated through the body by longitudinal "Meridians." They are if fact all linked perfectly with the corresponding times of the day in series. With the inclusion of the central "GOVERNING and CIRCULATORY" meridians, we get each of the meridians corresponding to the twelve divisions of each day where the organ is strongest and most active. Your digestion is timed to be most active in mid day for instance. The subtle toroidal geometric symmetries of the meridians are too difficult to explain here without my diagram. This too will be added. thank you for your patience.

Appreciating this rotational wheel behavior in these Meta Formal models, is useful for understanding the implicit philosophy modeling the human existence, inwardly in terms of health and outwardly as reflective of nature and the human dynamic. {"As above so below." Metaphor for the symmetry between the Creator and the created world. <Blessed Be!> } Look at your Yin/Yang symbol. Fire feeds on Wood, and Fire is extinguished by Water. And so on.