The Aesthetics of Science

                         Please forgive me for posting unfinished pages, I find assertions, like red wine need time to breathe. Such are the aesthetics of science. If we want to understand that beautiful dance around the "Void of Content," approaching the unknown we must consider our choices. On this most practical level we all make decisions based on our preferences, desires and aesthetics. Yes it's true. This search for truth can be absolutely beautiful. More soon.

                         If you are reading this, you probably have opinions that are as distinctive as a fingerprint or a signature. Just like your little quirks, hangups and even your unique "Styles of Evasion."
                         (Reposted from #3. Some People Are Very Different, Very Differently. April 25th, 2013)  
                         {At this point I would like to enumerate four "Styles of Evasion."}

              1.  Active deception, Showing Off, Lying, Phonyness, Bragging, Exaggeration, Hyperbole,  etc.
              2.   Spacing out, Disengagement, Withdrawal, Omission, Vagueness, Aloofness, etc.
              3.   Condescension, Put downs, Dismissal,  Negation, Passive Aggression, etc.
              4.  Over Compartmentalization, Inaccessibility, Burnout, Over Conscientiousness etc.

          You probably recognize any or all of these evasions in yourself and or others.  Some more than others.  I'm showing the ways we confront or avoid the stresses of uncertainty. When in doubt, learned styles of evasion take over.  A little Meta Formally Logical diagram to demonstrate;

                                                                    2. Spacing Out
                                                         1. Lying       +      3. Condescension
                                                                    4. Burnout

          At the center of this diagram is the uncertainties we all can evade, just in our own way.  You will notice the symmetry and the two axis of polarity. Openness to these uncontrolled uncertainties is the mark of a truly open person. It is almost impossible to be open all the time. We have these evasions hardwired into our survival instincts. The next time you see someone being evasive, consider the source. They/We maybe feeling vulnerable.

          The two axis are; Horizontally,  Positive Misrepresentation of fact on the left side and the Negative Misrepresentation of emotions on the right side.     
                                       Vertically, Passive Evasion of responsibility on top and the Active Evasion of irresponsibility on the bottom.}

          The melding of genotypes with the peculiarly unrepeatable conditions for each person's life can never be duplicated. The science and math of a multivariate analysis of these kinds of variations are in fact some of the most cumbersome calculations known to computation. Just know that when we evade, we use energy and that any real sensitive will know it. Show a little empathy. This is where we get to show a little tact.

                         When our self reflections are done without an understanding of the commonalities of the human experience, we often feel very alone. Everyone does. But It has been said, (I don't remember exactly where, maybe it was me,) "Our personal problems all have a public dimension." This is obvious when we are confronted with shifts in bias as is the case of changing popular opinions. (Author's Message!)

                         I must admit that my writing has become too heavy. No fault of mine, such is my love. I doubt there is any other way to report the detailed sensitivity of my work. I need to be as truthful as I can possibly be. Who would have thought that gravitas could cause an informational black hole. This is one of those things that no one will believe until they can look for themselves. We are seeing the beginning of an educational event horizon. Possibly my work will not escape this informational undertow. Only those in the distant future will ever know I'm right about: "Preverbal Ordering Principles," "Coding Density Thresholds" and "Echo Imprinting." By then, my work will probably have been lost, as generally happens for most people. No big deal. But I could be very wrong, in many, many ways. Please forgive me.