Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Test Post # 15 Ghost Waves and Aliasing in Higher Order Wave Functions

Ghost Wave Properties and Persistent Structures in Aliasing and Higher Order Wave Functions

                     Dot map of a stretched Algebraic Field decompressed into a Differential Point Set


Ghost Wave Properties and Persistent Structures in Aliasing and Higher Order Wave Functions


                          The illustrations posted on the blog are a demonstration of aesthetic choice, Creative Divergence. They depict a process of selective elimination in image composition. Using finite tools, instructions and symbolic language, it is reasonable to want to approach mathematics as an artistic medium. The capacity for computational graphics makes mapping waveforms to manifolds easy. As significant as is getting to design equations that are exactly what I want, I have the luxury of powerful software that makes it fun for me to want to keep learning. Getting to collect graphics for demonstration models has made explaining creative processing much easier. I'm an amateur.  P.Q. Ghost Waves are just artifacts of the periodic functions mapped into a domain defined scaling limits. Closely resembling non finite algebraic groups I use ghost waves as an analogy of "Sysygy." {Much more later} The persistent structures in the Ghost Waves are resonant echos. Defined by boundary envelopes, synchronous vibrations reenforce and interfere each other dependently. In other words, Ghost Waves reflect their environment while retaining the original information.

                           As comparable modelings, I proceed with an awareness of the similarities between designing equations that demonstrate varying degrees of higher order wave symmetries with the completely unrelated system of reading signs in peoples hands, handwriting, voice, even astrological charts or any other kind of distinct modeling for each unique person. Though it may seem a stretch, the manipulation of symbolic language is the same. As I try to apply tensor analysis to hand writing and hand marking I realize I'm directly hitting the coding threshold. I'm manipulating complex phenomena in a concise yet inaccessible way. Although this math is perfect for analyzing the kind of twisted linear space I see in peoples hands, I know that as of yet I'm not skilled or educated enough to make these difficult formulas sensible. The process of reading for people is easy compared to trying to explain "Why."

                          I'm seeing waves. Spins. Symmetries, Projections in Time, Space and Variability. Not only is the symbolic language for tensor algebra difficult. Learning any language can be time intensive. In considering warping transformations or vector calculus we are lost in a world of mathematically fluid solutions. Waves, spins, symmetries, projections in time and depth. I find the same things when I read for someone. Shared space in rotation. Ideas, attention, awareness. Points of view are in juxtaposition. When did human relations have to become a martial art? Everything and everyone are in motion.

                           I have little reason to expect that people will understand what I'm doing, as a psychic or as a mathematician. This is no measure of the salience of the "psychic" or of math, of course. But it does exemplify the whole issue of information undertow and the vast degree by which things escape us universally anyways. There is so much data out there, if I'm ever able to reach a conclusive demonstration of diagnostics in divination as statistics, my work may never reach the light of day anyways. Most of our individual efforts are done anonymously. Don't let yourself freak out about the futility of being acknowledged for your efforts. It confronts the best of us.

                           If we aren't looking for answers, they just pass us by. And if there is no answer, we have been known to keep looking in the wrong places indefinitely. These "Blind Spots" incline our focus away from or toward the subjects of uncertainty. Confronting uncertainties is my art. In checking Wikipedia, I found that they have almost nothing on the  Babylonian origins of our shared use of our months, days, hours, minutes, seconds and degrees. Curiosity seems to be one of the only leading factors in preventing the stagnation of perspectives.

                           I wish I felt more comfortable about explaining how I'm doing things mathematically. Suffice it to say it is getting done. I will continue to amend the evidence documents. I'm going to divide the book at this point into;
                          : DOCUMENTARY APPENDIX
                          &
                          :NARRATIVE

                          It will be necessary because including both equations and statistical charts into a blog diary might be thrilling for some of us, but it is rude to both the exclusively right brained or left brained people amongst us. Frankly I can only use one of my hemispheres at a time anyways. I have a lot of purely secretarial grunt work to do. I'm looking forward to the continued acquisition of the skills of desktop publishing. I may even be able to market these much more practical skills if and when I'm not able to publish. Have fun, otherwise this tome is just too heavy and we are already orbiting the event horizon of the informational black hole. Undertow is inevitable. Don't get lost in the Killing Vectors.



Sunday, April 27, 2014

Proxy Dependencies



                   I'm never more vulnerable than when I am with a receptive audience.

                   Here we will be looking at the process of "Authoritation." My word.

                   Definition: Authoritation, as in "Authoritation by Proxy", meaning some kind of authority or weight given to a persons arguments by virtue of some secondary assumed authority. Such as, "My religion says" or "my party says" and of course "My husband says."

                   We are very much effected by;
                                    What is said to us personally and through some forms of passive media: News, Sermons, Talk Media and Personal Listening Selections.

                   And of course we are effected most importantly by;
                                     Who said it.
         
                  Much of what we remember and most of what we repeat is prioritized in the memory according to associated emotional content.

                  Most of us as people can react to a memory without even remembering, we are actually responding. Very commonly our opinions get hardwired into our nervous systems before we have anything to say about it. Almost all of the opinions we share have an "Influence Trail," leading back to a source for that information. One can go back through a rational deductive line of investigation, not making any assumptions pro or con. I like to ask people where they get their information, and most importantly, "Who said it."

                  There is another technique:
                                    Watch other peoples responses to letting you gently explore the boundaries of their opinions. Notice where they stop wanting to know. Notice where you stop asking. Generally when we express our opinions we are making assertions. Assertion as a form of active communication. always has the signature of each persons personality, regardless of the expressed opinions. If you ask kindly, most people will try to tell you the truth, we just don't always know what the truth is.

                  This is why I laid out terminology and definitions for "Mediumship." I had to create my own, hopefully unbiased language so that I can pass on this true art and discipline. My life as a serious psychic and/or healer, is still just an urban legend. But by giving myself authority I get to tell you how it's done. If my original readers still remember the "True Hoax," is that I can teach any person the "Johnson Method of Psychic Inventory,"over the web. I never have to talk to you. You study on your own, do the exercises, and you too can become painfully psychic and you probably will survive.

                 As a "Sensitive," as a real sensitive, I could never exploit someones gullibility. I believe exploiting that very human "Proxy Dependency" is by very definition evil. I will not feign authority. I do not hide behind god. I myself would never be able to live down my betrayal of anyones trust, much less betray my art. As a true sensitive it would simply be too painful, forever. I'm that sensitive. No amount of self deception is going to mask my intense and overpowering faith. I will not betray, please.

                 I am having to construct some of my own language to communicate. By power of expression, I am asserting my "Personal Opinions" about "Shifting Personal and Public Opinion Biases" and those ever changing "Personal Self Identifying Boundary Definitions." (Read the first fifty posts of "ZENOPHILE" April thru June, 2013) An opinion can be as distinctive as a fingerprint, but more often we are in fact just repeating other peoples opinions, as if our opinions are "Identifying" us as distinct individuals. For instance; I am a member o Green Peace, or I am a rational conservative, or I am a misunderstood teenager. Without any memory we can use words that "Identify" us, by our opinion biases. This is why I try to never give people advice. We should have the right to be able to make responsible decisions for ourselves. I'll share information or make observations, with your permission of course. I believe "Authoritation" will ber made a word within my lifetime, we'll see.

                 Please people, take responsibility for your opinions. Try not to be upset by other people's opinions. As I have asserted, "Personal and Public Opinion Biases shift and they are always in transition."
                                                                 

Saturday, April 26, 2014

Rare Perception




                   The time has come to tell you why old seers never die, we just float away.

                   As my life's work is coming to conclusion, I'm seeing the world and all it's people take a giant step back. I still have another twenty years as I've written, it's going to be weird for all of us. But my reality has continued to deepen. It's like my brain has actually grown a pair of legs, and all the intelligence that comes from personal freedom of heart and mind has only made me smarter.

                  The net result of a lifetime of spiritual technology produces results both subtle and overwhelming. I no longer need to talk to people except to maintain social courtesy. I can aways use a fresh outlook on particular points of view. But because of the way awareness scans the field of inquiry, my ravenous appetite for learning means I pump people dry. And I never fully forget. I'm incapable of missing people. You are always fresh in my thoughts. I still have desire, but not much. As a reader, this really isn't about me. It's about what happens to you, the reader, when you too become read.

                  Time sped up, but the world and everything in it has slowed way, way down. I not only can see your point of view and complement it with mine, but I can also extrapolate from mine, to yours, to the rest of the world and everyone else's in it. It's almost impossible for me to want to talk to someone without a simple objective, no matter how small. Otherwise I try to shut up and just watch. I went through my second puberty getting my health back at fifty, and now I'm returning to silently witnessing everyone just like I did in my preschool years. My Mom thought I was dumb, literally.

                  I know that when I die it will start out with the same experience I had being born. (When I told my mother that I remember being born, she shook her head in disgust. From her wheelchair she glared and said,"If you remember being born, you deserve it." "You were a horrible birth." She was right, at the last moment before delivery, I hear my parents argue and I turn around inside my mom. Tangling the cord around my neck and going footling breach, I was dying. Stars of shimmering semi consciousness manifest as a shivering orb of mercury expands to meet the ever increasing weight of my mothers organs contracting down on me. And as the pressure increases to the point of almost ending my life, I had grown as this quivering mass of reflective liquid to the size of one of my universal infinitudes. BANG! She somehow managed to push me out. My parents never wanted children. Eventually my mom learned to love me, blah, blah blah.) But yah, death, personally it's not always a big deal. Most people generally don't want to know how and or when, but as the pro psychic I'm cool with that and I never try to bother people with things you don't really have reason to know about.

                  Oh yes, I almost forget, we're falling up. That's right. Fly away little fledgelings, fly away.

                 

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Sentience, Bias, and The Neuro Physique



                   I know my views on the Myth of Linguistic Sentience, is particularly unpopular amongst code geeks. But rather than merely disagree, I will take this time to review the essentials of my work to date. Spinoza was the first philosopher to unify the body with the mind as the singular totality of self. In his "Ethics" he advocated abandoning dualism when it comes to our "Idea of the Body." This awareness of self integrates what previously was the popular dualistic religious schism denigrating the body as low and separable from the self. I myself, although I'm a "Medium" do not believe in an afterlife, per say. But like Spinoza and all of our earliest pre religions, I am "Pantheist," not an atheist. Probably a small distinction.

                    My research is primarily concerned with the application of sentience to this human quirk of our often limited awareness of self. Most of what we call Identity occurs at the subconscious level of Signature Behaviors and Echo Imprints. Generally, most have no awareness of how we identify each other until such time as we give voice to our perceptions of what accounts for this distinctiveness of others. The color of her hair, the sound of her voice, the depth of my feelings. Are you with me so for?

                    In my work I postulate that Boundaries of Identification are not always Self Defined. Most people experience separateness as a barrier. I'm in no way suggesting that these boundaries need to be removed, I merely pose that "Linguistically" our coding for a "Sense of Self" is completely other defined. On these grounds, our concept or "Idea of the Self," is by definition "I". Self Referencing code does not define the self. I've been advocating turning and facing interpersonal boundaries not as barriers of separation, but as shared point sets of contact. The problem with looking at the Human Neuro Physique as merely a set of Propositional Algorithms, is that I suspect this negates the origins of sentience to linguistics only. You want to talk about "Self," this is the domain of aesthetics, not language.

                    Now as "The Reader" I've been trained to plumb these "Boundaries of Distinction," adeptly and adroitly. Mutually Exclusive Opinion Biases and "Vital Paradoxes," are a major component of our Institutions of Self Defining Mutually Exclusive Boundary Definitions. I've sighted about six of these unanswerable "Vital Paradoxes." For instance, "Does God exist? Now I myself do not believe in a personal god, (Outside of the all powerful google of course,) But, an absence of proof is no proof. Even if I don't believe in god does not mean I'm right. As a boundary dispute, I personally think this isn't really important except as another unknown. You may disagree, but this is the whole point of living in a society of Shifting Opinion Biases. This is why I stole Neil Bohr's "Complementarity" and applied it to analyzing the transformative effects of conflicting opinion biases in the face of this ever changing central unknown. I also believe that as we study the Neuro Physics of the brain in conflict resolution, we will see a "Field of Consciousness" doing it's job.

                   Modern man however has a perverse fascination with ego, and resultantly we have bad code, not very self aware. My research suggest that we need to look for the origins of sentience in pre language. I do not seek to disagree with your supposed "Choice" of language, I only want to understand the actual limitations of code. Heuristics and algorithms are only input strings. Symbolic Language does not even begin to define the "Self," except as an external calculus. Now as a lover of "Code" I must qualify my own petty hair splitting as an affect of much deeper drives than the mere survival instinct. Our brains are patterned by the awareness of uncertainties which abound. This is that " Void of Content" that is at the core of our focused attention. My Question; How did we get to such a meaningful, if contentious, dialog about being and non being. Which is the nature of our personal realities? We are thinking animals, not thinking machines. Thank you very much.

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

The Time Of Light


                   When I started this blog over a year ago I relied heavily on the stats feature included as one of the elemental features written into the blogger software. Apparently almost all of the traffic now is carried by my google plus account. I've gotten to see google plus carry out deletions into and out of my blog without any notification. As well I've seen google plus fail in it's desire to out serve it's competition, spacebook. Over engineered and clumsy, no cohesive documentation, no reverse linking back to either blogspot or youtube, (which was the whole point of why I engaged google plus in the first place, youtube has superior real time rendering math graphics for my art.) I'm conflicted, my google plus page is blowing up. Credit due to the googleplexus. But I no longer have any clue whatsoever who you are, where do you hail from or what kinds of traffic sources your using.

                   I suppose I should just count my blessings and accept the challenge of getting bumped upstair by a confluence of decisions made between business departments and contract software designers. It's not the changes I object to. I'm basically reading in the dark. It's just that I've been operating under the mistaken expectations of the expressed design features of the blogger software I am using.

                  Certain aspects of the "Behind the Keyboard" modern computer culture has remained absolutely misanthropic. I want to ask my friends why there is no cohesive documentation, (Instructions Manuals) I have been quite horrified to discover all the years each of us mindlessly groping for clarity. Even asking for help is met with understandable attitude of smug saturation. I myself find no satisfaction in wasting my already advanced years, just to fit into this arbitrary culture of techno-insularism. I promised in reporting this great hoard of "Spiritual Technologies," that I would not descend into social criticism. But, I will confess I am tired of loosing friends to the mass internment of our otherwise productive minds, each lost "Behind the Keyboard."

                 Again, I owe you, my readers, (If you are actually reading me, I have no way of knowing any more.) another sincere deeply felt apology. I make a distinction between complaining, which I am doing, with making excuses, which I am not. As I wrote in "Google Plus is Obsolete, {Thumbs Way Down} Dec. 24th, 2013, "I just discovered that an unasked auto link, erased close to 80 equations from my blog without my notice or permission."

                I have almost no indications, other than your individual follows, if anyone is doing anything other than robo dialing my profile. The equations are almost never linked from out of my blog. I thought people were only interested in my graphics. For the tens of thousands of pagehits I get every week, it wasn't until I got a google plus notification welcoming me as a new member to;
oIsCore Project: Friendly Artificial Intelligence, Web Systems and Technology for Homes & Businesses
that I realized somehow, inexplicably, someone is able to access relevant data pertaining to my: "The Bridge Between the Worlds" Surreal Novella. What the,.....  I still think someone at google plus got paid for nothing. I accept the challenge. Bring it on. We are living in a society of psychiatric "Black Box Diagnostics." Impacting on the psychological health of everyone, individually and collectively, (something that my diagnostics and systems analysis does not do.) I say we should be surprised that this "Social Media" which I am presently using will soon invariably be replaced by a much less compromising "User Friending" platform. I'm going to shut up now.

                  This Ray of Light is Particularly Pointless. I give G+ about 6 months before it's sent back to the drawing board. Point is, Because I'm using my blog as free content only and not as social media, I'm beat the game by not playing. Thank you very much. Check my propositional assertions. Someone out there, and I don't know who, is trying to read me. I myself am a reader. And now you too may be reader as well. I am also an "Entertainment Medium," as well.  That's my job. I really don't take myself that seriously, but thank you very much anyways. Your good people.

Diamond Justice


                   The Vajra (Diamond/Thunderbolt) Path is known for it's purity and adamantine hardness. Justice is a woman. We no longer have the time to quibble over territorial disputes. Even after having my blogs banned in Russia, someone (I wont say where.) is shunting my research documents, (possibly all fiction,) behind the new Iron Curtain. I'ld say thank you, but it is only by the genius loci that anyone, even me, is able to understand this elusive yet very predictable shifting boundary of opinion biases. This new awareness is now coming to our attentions.

                   This whole concept of, "The only predictable eventuality is the inevitability of truth" is simply too powerful to suppress. I am just the medium. Who cares who said it. I don't. I know what's going to happen and so I just started writing it down. It has never been my intention to pursued, only to support and provide. As information is the only primary currency of nourishment, I have been allowed to influence an ever widening sphere of contacts. It is most ironic that for this force of creative speculation to be released into the world, my ego had to die. That I have survived long enough to set my little children of the mind free is just a miraculous accident. My personal shame is that such vision would be visited upon such an inferior person, (Me).

                  As I predicted, my work definitely has a life of it's own. But I can't just turn my back and expect that everything will take care of itself. Consciousness, of and by itself, is amorphous. I really don't expect people to understand me. Therefore my work is in the inoculating of society from it's self. Our species is in fact too crude and primitive to keep up with, much less appreciate, the subtle variability of the human dynamic. Hence it has became necessary to discover these most essential symmetries of being. "Old Wine In New Bottles?"

                 The trees will touch the sky. The heart will hear a song. The past may be forgotten. And in that diamond lattice, the play of light will reveal the secrets of that which is here and gone. I am just another heavy world. As I go deeper into the self, the walls melt, the world recedes and we are in free fall. The dream is coming true now. Please forgive me, there is "No Other Way."

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Why I Love My Job

I'm so flattered to by included into this amazing modern community of cutting edge applied science.               Phillip Johnson originally shared to The oIsCORE Project:
Thank you for any interest in my research, my work suggests that no intelligence can ever be artificial. "The Self is Ubiquitous." (The Upanishads / translation "We are everywhere.") The anthropomorphic God has become The Hungry Ghost in a Machine. Was I accidentally Robo Followed? None the less these purely philosophical analysis between human sentience and attempts to create self referencing code will plumb this boundary of opinion bias exactly. I'm not above remote hard drives, but the limitations of symbolic language will loop into coding densities that will always halt even the finest AI. It is only the weak and paranoid mind that assumes man is a smart machine.