Dead Plan Walking-Twitching and Spewing All the Way

Slightly off center, but I think Hilary dodged a terrible fate and would have been unfairly crucified. Maybe next time, if there is a next time.

On a more positive note, this was the most un thought out hostile takeover of any corporate party ever. And I think all the evil skeletons are out of their closets now, once and for all. I see a lot of people on the left who are not prepared to win this culture war. We're going to see what happens soon after that "Night before the morning after," for the faltering fascist right. To quote the idiot in the "Hot Seat, "It's going to be great."

Please don't hate me, I just think this is the beginning of a liberal renaissance, for the whole world over. And he's already starting to twitch and spew, and basically fall apart.

What? Still too soon?

Why I Never Write Memes

               Memes never come in paragraphs. I'm just another guilty pleasure to the few who read me. Just because no one sees you doesn't mean you aren't truly beautiful. And remember, "We love you."

               I'ld like to thank Wikipedia for all the images I've posted that aren't mine. As well those from all the other hidden artists that I've gotten permission to share freely. When we make a commitment to love and love openly, we don't worry as much about getting paid. Money is only a means to an end, and sometimes it just gets in the way. Most of the mutual news providers I get to read on my home page, often beat out the national news for quickness and accuracy. As much as I may only be another silent contributor, our Mutual Magazine Cultures (a.k.a. relevant honest social media) pervades our recovering societies and is curative and a preservative. Try reducing that to a meme.

             

Why I'm Not Ready For Your International Business

         Thank you for the invite, I'm not ready to offer a prospectus for the rollout of my P.P.I. (Personal Profiling Inventory) This is a checklist of mutual examination techniques used by  very few alternative diagnosticians. I've been paid to see thousands of peoples handwriting and hands, in combination with doing contact therapies and inductive massage for pain management and traumatic injuries. My desire is to document these often abused and very easily misunderstood practices. I identify peoples opinion biases separating people on both sides of countless issue of varied significance, Pro & Con. Each are usually very contentious complete with prejudicial barriers to any communication.

         Separating out these evolving and growing industries from corrupt manipulators who are  usually exploiting peoples faiths, prejudices and superstitions, has made my job a difficult sell. I usually don't try to market myself. One option has been to design a data base from which individuals can examine the available media on these arts and emerging sciences for themselves at a small markup. But because of the pretenses of all pseudo scientific methodologies, most people are unable or unwilling to suspend judgement long enough to embrace healthy skepticism, while still being able to test for the strengths of these developing modes of diagnostics.

         The overwhelming similarity between my work and statistical analytics in general has lead me to examine peoples split opinion biases. This has provided what I use in writing news commentary on my blog. People generally don't see the process of "Pro versus Con" as the dialectic tending toward informative synthetic resolution. Politics, I'm afraid is so caught up with reluctant transformation of our aging society, that the sudden influx of these alternative diagnostics practices are perceived as ignorantly and arrogantly superstitious and thus often rebelliously blasphemous or even worse anti-American.

            Because what I've been doing and documenting for most of my life is still so fraught with antagonistic misapprehensions biased by the spiritual abuses of politics, I doubt I alone will ever be able to get these skills to a discerning market. However, as with most everything I've written about to date, much of what I propose does  comes to fruition without me.

             Thank you again. I'll keep your suggestions in my bookmarks, someday I may except your offer, but I feel at this time this would not be a good fit for most of your members. I am enjoined in an international marketing mindset. I may think globally, but I act only locally. I am a blogger, who does only freelance consultations and treatments out of my home at this time.

Depolarizing Personal Abstracts for Unbiased Language Acquisitions

                                The challenge of speaking (or writing) in plain spoken unbiased language that is not partisan or bias directed, without ambiguity, is the only way to be understood on controversial issues. Ideally we shouldn't need prefaces to predicate opinions that are on normal socially acceptable differences.

                                A rare comment from a wise but liberal intellectual stated, "There seems to be an abstract that I'm missing. Other than the heading, I usually don't understand what your talking about." (Paraphrased by me.) My writings are on the glaring biases of pro and con arguments. I'm not just being equal opportunity offender on sensitive issues. But I haven't been giving my readers enough credit for the very opinion biases I want to encourage. Independent of my attempts to dissolve barriers to communication on both sides of controversies.

                                I wrote, "You are the abstract." Now this is true when discussing personal biases of opinion only. But I my need to be more supportive. I write about the experiential language barriers by degree. We are all stumbling blind on our quest to solve the worlds most precipitous problems. Our experiential biases are in everything from education and class to our overwhelming national appetite for contrarian split bias opinion barriers. Our war on "Fake" opinions has become a battle for the re-appropriation of an otherwise sensible but corrupted language. My vagaries are simply unacceptable. I choose to report on the subjects of Oracles and there use in the randomization of comparable data set analogies. Metaphors have a unified metric.

                                My readers use of this term, "Abstract" in this situation is referring to the academic convention of providing an overview at the beginning of a difficult paper, pre-ordering significant features for an otherwise obscure document, just like a map key. To describe this reader, as the "Abstract" in question is accurate. But it's still too obscure when I'm writing for a rational atheist who is looking at documented practices of traditional divination from a purely analytic perspective. The mathematics of finite algebraic groups alone is worthy of comprehensive documentation, regardless of whether or not someone may have any cause to respect the practice. Because of the density of information in my analysis of these generally abused and corrupted practices, this means I am often reviled and misunderstood on both sides of my neutral literary exercise.

                                 Intriguingly, as I had intended, this is an example of a supremely deep chasm between polarized experiential biases. I've proven the reality of the generally misconceived unreconcilable conflicts between world views. For me to provide "Abstracts" for my writings, I will need to write separate Map Keys for peoples on both sides of our preferred choices of language.

                                 I really don't know if I have cleared anything up for anyone. But if I have, maybe you can see the subtle reflective symmetries between this relatively low priority subject, and other subjects of much greater conflicts and disagreements.

Why I Hate Being a "Psychic"

                                                      Rosicrucian Cross by junemoon.com
                                                                   background by me

                            This literary exercise is designed to expose the popular myths and myth conceptions on both sides of this contentious, but generally unimportant issue. Misinformation dominates this arbitrary and divisive subject. Opinion biases are the gauge symmetry of pro and con, and mutually discounted by opposing peoples conflicting world views. But in ages of mass stupefaction, Oracles have gotten the same corporate mistreatment as did the "Prophets." By worshipping historical insights from ancient religious Authorities as the sacred "Gospel Truth," we've reinfected our society with the very delusions that have been exploited throughout human time. A submissiveness to God is usually confused with Church, Temple and Mosque, as if there were no "Moral Code" of sufficient virtue to warrant practice without institutionalization by religious hierarchy. Getting "Outed" by other so called professional psychics, just for being a Non Believer means, I've been branded a Heretic. I am not psychic. I am a "Professional Psychic," and I don't have to believe in anything at all, one side or the other.

                             But now over the web, "Blue faces" take the place of soap box evangelists and are now screaming preachy declarations at us in meme form. These noisy dictators polarize the ballot boxes by using brainwashing techniques on vulnerable and gullible true believers. My reasoning thus calibrates grades of bullshit used by corrupt politicians, by comparing politicians to the spiritual abuses and moral hazards of deluded psychics, arrogant clergy and of course the religiously self serving financiers. Not every psychic, politician or C.E.O. is equally insane, corrupt or ignorant. But I still have much that I need to explain. In tracking the dissemination of my reports on the plusses and minuses of Oracles, predictive media and speculative models in general, I'ld like to separate out some useful products from all the other signaling noise getting passed off as believable truths. I can't stand lying to make a living, so I've had to side with skeptics and stop taking revenue. That being said, I suspect that my research is correct. I'm using very powerful software every time I employ the data randomization techniques that are the utility of an Oracle. The utter randomness of comparative mapping guarantees detached subjectivity. The only problems result from confusing the analytic modeling for objectivity. Again, this is the comparative analysis by analogy only. One of the most daunting problems stems from when a reader becomes adept at using language accurately, yet one should never be believed. Being right about having excellent predictive skills, is a terrible curse.

                             Jungian Developmental Psychology is a psychoanalysis by associated complexes only. All available metrics are for comparative analysis by analogy only. The practice of effective psychoanalysis never advocates prejudices that prevent peoples rational empathy skills. Stereotyping people, pro or con, is always bad medicine. Reducing a person to mere generalities and then stroking that persons fragile ego boundaries for an identification of exclusivity or desired belonging, is the very practice of evil in it's most pernicious form. But then we come to the vital paradoxes, from which we don't have any good answers, we only have dubious models with which to aid in the explorative of speculations.  I've written much on, "The map is not the territory," and "You need not believe in order to perceive." But especially when I get to the diagnostics, like how I've seen thousands of clients hands, and they do say a lot. I'm confronted with that "Informational Void of Content" surrounding my work and popularized mutual ignorance, on both side of this polarized issue. Psychic or not, I know something about you don't know, you don't have to believe me regardless of which bias you take.

Recessively Recurrent Wisdoms

"Kali" by junemoon.com

I've spent my whole life studying ancient traditions. My teacher of the "Psychic Arts" when asked, "What do you believe in?' said, "I believe in the three fold Mother Goddess." "The White Goddess" by Robert Graves outlays contrarian poetic practices of oral and historic documentary. The remnants of Sappho for instance reveals her to be at the end of a highly advanced culture of female academics that stayed at home while men were militarized and left uneducated abroad. She was mistaken for a man hater through history although very famous in her own time. As much as I've always loved the libraries as a place of solace, I find myself wondering. Is the resurgence of "Transitioning" in bohemian communities like mine a response to the stupidity of gender binary identification barriers?

"Transitioning" as I used the term, refers to gender reassignment. Another odd but hopefully useful terminology shared by my teacher, was what he called "Esoteric Feminism." He'd say "The man must become the peacemaker as the woman is a warrior," healthy inevitable role reversal. He also added the Hindu adage that states, "Shiva without Shakti is a corpse." This often is paraphrased to mean that the subjectively masculine reason, without the Objective animating feminine force of life and reality is a dead proposition. My friends gloss departs from the proverb to say, "And Shakti without Shiva is a thug." If you met my sister you would see how this can sometimes be observed by comparing the end results of the inevitable need for role reversals and the switching of conventional polarities as codified by a dysfunctional patriarchal society. Also compare Coquille with Coquette from the Commedia del Arte, stock theatrical portrayals of characters with the platonic love of bardic tradition. These archetypes were the mainstay of even such radical performers as Charlie Chaplin, with his tramp giving flowers to the innocent but more affluent woman as a gesture of futile affection.

Wow, I sure as heck wasn't expecting that. I certainly agree Hinduism is as spiritually corrupted as any religion. The flowering of renaissance throughout history has had to deal with traditions of spiritual abuse. My attempts at highlighting moments of creative understanding may not be agreeable for you, but I'm still learning. As referenced through your "Massive Testosterone Induced Hallucinations." {I'ld also like to borrow this, it's good.} You maybe drawing the whole pretense of masculine objectivity into question, and you're challenge may be with my personal comfort level with subjectivity, and not my maleness. But hey, I'm getting allot from your engagement and I only hope I'm not being unfairly provocative in my review. I still want to thank you, this is gold.

Sensitive Emotional Boundaries and Intuitive Aprehension

             I started cataloging essential concepts needed to take good directions. Just applying a biometric to so called sensitivities, doesn't hold any water until it's backed up with recordable variabilities for analysis with the available statistical modeling. {Much more on the Heuristics of Personalization Profiling later.} Technique wise, I'm identifying distinguishing qualities. We provide information generated by amusing curiosity and often a real need. I then point out, "I don't know what the answer is, but now let's look at what the answer(s) probably are going to be." This is usually revealing. I avoid portraying some pretentious authority, Gurus, and leaders in general, can often spiritually abuse.

          
            We'll have to start with being sensitive to people's; Personal Boundary Space.   Defining your own emotional boundaries and sensitivity can be critical to understanding others.  We must take responsibility for being aware of others feelings. We also need to be able to protect ourselves.  Being able to appreciate people as individuals is a unique virtue and a priceless gift. Being able to read people's mind for me is just a disturbing side effect of caring.  I love my job.  I just need to be really be careful.  Blah,  Blah,... Blah.  And so on.

            As "Sensitives,"  we so called "Psychics" also have to protect ourselves. So. Never lie, especially to yourself. All people have "BIAS  FEARS," Pro and Con, believers and disbelievers alike. (At parties, there is usually no shortage of guys who want to punch me out, and I sympathize with their disgust for psychics. Most readers are terrible readers and certainly not even vaguely psychic.) I really do prefer some healthy skepticism. I don't have to let my own personal biases get in the way. Telling you this weeds out the stragglers. I don't want unreceptive clients. I don't need people to agree with me. I prefer people with different opinions from mine.  In working with people, I don't like judging people or taking their inventory.
            
            Now as to the sensitive boundaries, this is where we find the real pros.   I'll demonstrate using some of my own personal biases and basic boundary issues;
                                    
            I've come to love looking at peoples hands.  Palms and Handwriting. I get to hold people's hands, thousands of them. I feel them. Everyone feels different to me.  I'll be using models to demonstrate the actual statistical mapping for variability, more later.

            This is a thousand times more sane than this sounds. I'm perfectly aware how different people feel about these issues. I always support different people in faith. And I love people for whatever they believe. I also do inductive massage touching and feeling others. Treating pain, grief and loss.  I have been loathed by psychics who say that I don't believe, and that I'm just doing it by the numbers. But I have enough faith to want to master my craft. DO THEY?

             I'm a very gifted reader.  But I don't believe in any of it at all. And I'm really good at it. Too good. And I don"t believe in any of it. But it works. I love reading. It's hard work.  I have pride. This exemplifies the practical absurdity of me being a self doubting psychic.  I have issues. And I feel it is more than disrespectful to dismiss any one's opinion, and it is not my place to criticize.
            
            I would very much like to make this not about me. I'm not complaining at all. Don't get me wrong. I actively experience life as a sensitive. I think it's good luck to be able to tell which voices are inside of me alone. I hear so much.  I totally buy into the pure magic.  What I get to do with people is not easily dismissed. This isn't about me. It never was. And I'd like to prove it.  Looking at peoples hands. Looking into their eyes. Listening to their voices. Touching your bodies. I read into the metaphorical stars.

            And by the way, another bias fear I have, I choose not to be attracted to people when it is not appropriate. I don't like sexual tension. "Intuitive Apprehension" and "Intuitive Tension" creates a boundary between self and others, a mirror of sorts. The "Mirror of Karma" as it is written in the "Tibetan Book of the Dead,"  is where all our good and evil deeds are reflected therein.  Attachments and payoffs do come with the disincentives of moral hazards.                       
            
            I myself am showing symptoms of a "Neutral Opinion Bias Fear"  I don't want to take sides.
The opinion biases between so called believers and non believers as detractors and advocates are actually about the same to me.  When it comes to psychics most people are at least a little skeptical, or at least we should be. Being sensitive about people's different faiths, beliefs and desires has made getting to see peoples hands easy and fun for me, rather than creating anxiety for me or for my many querent. People almost always like my readings very much. I make people very comfortable. But I must confess. I do have a strong Bias, but it is a neutral bias, based on experience and tact. 

             Let us proceed to the next most immediate sensory boundary, "Others?" How do we perceive others? We use our senses. People can either enjoy being read or it can be a violation. Let someone read you, you should have the choice, it should never be an abuse of power. {In a age of data mining and surveillance industries, we have pretty much lost the subtle sensitivity of privacy and diplomacy.}

             Usually some of the easiest people for me to read, are the dry stoics who think I'm deluded, corrupt and or dangerous. I not only support their distaste for fuzzy excuses for human interaction, but I also want proof. These usually men are very easy for me to understand. These people like to think there is no working in the subjective realm of personal awareness, largely because they think they can't be read. Fortunately people with thick emotional boundaries can also be very shrewd and perceptive, and are often unintentionally the best intuitive them self. They, (and maybe all of us) are always denying that there may indeed be something subtly important that they (or we) are not aware of. Question becomes, "How do we go into what you don't already know about, in following information being generated by your personal interest based curiosity or need alone?" {What does the hand say? No, seriously, I'm asking.}

               I don't believe in type casting, but I will be going over maps for analysis of variabilities and for the comparison of types and typologies.  Thank you for holding up on your end of the bargain.  I'm still learning, and this is proving to be far more usable than I could have ever hoped for. Re edited for clarity.