Knowing the Difference Between Innocent Naivete' and Arrogant Denial.

                             
                                   Knowing the Difference Between Innocent Naivete' and Arrogant Denial.


                          Personal differences can predispose people to be utterly naive about each other. Blind spots can for most people seem like insurmountable barriers. For instance most men have a very limited understanding of the strengths and virtues of the female brain. Most woman are not that much better at understanding men. Polarity for most is like an Iron Curtain. Negotiations easily break down. Try to set a good example by not taking resistance personally. Tact is golden.

                         Watching people's responses is about the only way you will know if someone is actually hearing what you are trying to communicate. You will want to prepare yourself for the variety of evasive behaviors people exhibit. When people don't like what you are saying, don't get discouraged. Most skeptics are actually going to want to try to listen. But they have usually formed exclusively biased opinions about psychics. However, only a smaller portion of skeptics will take it upon themselves to be jerks toward you. Like I've said, they will want to think you are insane, ignorant or stupid. Try not to take it personally. Your true believers are going to be much more annoying anyways, just because they will want you to be just like them, in faith as well as in bias.

                          If you can see past personal biases you simply change the game to include the person you are reading to. They don't have to agree with you. But you will have to be agreeable to them, You will want to frame what you say for that particular person. But don't pretend you are going to change anyone's opinion. You can be dead right about knowing that the woman's fiance is a lounge lizard. But even if the bride "to be," hears you; she may not be able to, or even want to, protect herself. So always leave yourself the option of being ignored. History is littered with legends about great and powerful idiots who wouldn't listen. Not to mention those schmucks who hear you, but who will arrogantly chose to reinterpret what a reader says, just to serve themselves, usually with disastrous results. Not to even bring up the psychic who oversteps their ground by imposing their opinions as "TRUTH." There are always more psychics if you really need to spend your money.

                         Let's look at another 3 "Cycle Models." This first one I saw on "Sesame Street," a very popular children's educational program here in the U.S. I'll call it a "Wheel of Emotion."

                                                                      2.Adulthood
                                                                        {>,}Angry

                                     1.Youth       { ^,}Happy     "O"       {v,}Sad       3.Maturity

                                                                        Fearful{<,}
                                                                        4.Death

                          We will compare this type of model to a similar but unrelated artifact of "THE TIBETAN BOOK OF THE DEAD," This is mapping the realms of attachment we all confront as we die. (I'll finish this tomorrow morning. It's really good I'm finally getting this academic stuff written down.)  I'll also start laying out the symmetrical mappings for "TAROT," four suits {elements,} etc.