Friday, August 30, 2013
The Language of Perceptual Ordination
Another wonderful religious artifact is the keystone that holds up the vaulted ceilings and domes of the cathedrals and mosques. The "Monstrance, is a sunburst. The receptacle contains the consecrated Host exposed for veneration. Like a halo, this sunburst is a symbol of the radiance of the spirit.
I will use this symbol as a model for perception. Awareness radiates. Simply speaking, the lines of attention have names. Up and down. Left and right, Back and forth, Before and after. Four lines, four dimensions. Stating at the beginning, awareness is generated from the center projected outwardly. Your 1st primary boundary is from the self to other(s). Within this boundary of self, there are definitions, divisions, simple elegant math. The monstrance shows a symbol of symmetry. This measuring of space is very logical. We are studying ancient science. This is that innate symmetry. A modular soul if you may.
These types of statements are so redundant as to be easily misunderstood. I could just as easily write many individual pages about each sentence. The naming of these most primary subjects is meta formally logical. We have the basic; SYMMETRIC UNITY DIVIDED BY ENUMERATE PARTITION {Local Gauge Metric.} That's a mouth full. And I am suggesting that we look at symbolic language as an enumerable discreet phenomena. Words have number. Images are symbolic language too. ( A few of my readers right now are thinking, "Imposing symmetrical laws onto everything was stupid." And it's why stupid people like me are still superstitious.) Look at how the machinery worked. It got us here. That's early science.
"Understanding" is this simple trick for rapidly analyzing data. You don't have to know everything. Meta formal logic just imposes structure by dividing the whole into equal parts. It's very simple and very hard to believe. It worked very well for early man and it gave us our society. It gave us our days and years, minutes and seconds. The naming of discreet subjects starts with the ordinals. The metaphors make much easier sense than does the math. I hope that the graphics will help. Scanned Images will be added very soon, making everything much more clear. Dividing important subjects into manageable pieces was how our ancestors learned to prioritize. Sequences, Series, Groups and Domaines. The ordering of information is as simple as organizing things by successive size. A middle, a beginning and an end.
In almost all metaphors, there are vectors, and there are symbols. By giving directions and characterizations, we can tell stories. I am telling an whopper. Investigative reporting is supposed to be about learning. (We will soon be coming to social algebra.) This process of the dissemination of information is the story of humanity.
We can identify a change in popular opinion bias, by the spread of new language. We all have individual histories, but we have only one shared meta formal logic. One became divided into two, the two are now counted as separate subjects and can be counted with that original one, becoming three, and so on. Four corners have the square, the cube has only six faces but eight corners. Look at a cube through its corners and you see a star. {Repeatedly illustrated in the already posted graphics.} Language is simple. People are confusing. But the language of our collective behavior is sometimes divine, reflected through our love of order and meaning. For all the chaos we bring into the world, we still do truly amazing things. Were it not for that occasionally radiant soul we would have died off a long time ago. (Some of my readers don't like metaphors.) Shine on!
In posting the math graphics I have presented a series of proofs. I am using symbolic language to tell a story. I know that I could be messing up horribly by passing out formulas. But the use of a visual metaphor is a lot like comedy. We may not always have to know the joke in order to get the spirit of the levity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Is there anybody out there?