Thursday, August 1, 2013

The Shape of Your Data

Four lines Intersect In A Hyperspace Like On A Hand Or In Handwriting

           
                         I'm so sorry for all the tedious explanations. It's so that even if you don't remember most of this, you will know how to do it technically. Everything will be technical when we come to analyzing data structure. We have already examined the meta formally structured data modeling of Bronze Age spiritual technology.

                         I actually I feel I can do better than this. I will be revising and re-editing this blog to turn it into a book form. Adding and correcting as I go along. Blogging, like psychic reading, is like poetry.
                        "It's not always what you say, or even how you say it."
                        "It's what you don't say, and knowing better, how you don't say it."

 Everything I want to be able to understand is very overly detailed. So many unanswered questions. I'm not supposed to say this.
                        How do I teach the greater issue? "How do I un-teach people?" People need a an opportunity for a conscious re-education. Otherwise I'm just doing your homework for you. You are not going to want to waste a lot of time looking at just the fingerprints, but you will want to know the basic shape of your information. A little more detail oriented precise variabilities, I then want to get back to your actual "EYE TRAINING."

                         The Shape of Your Data:

                               Looking at the variability of peoples interests or biases can often seem to form moving surfaces, actual boundaries.

                               Items of variability can be ordered and compared.

                               Comparisons of items can be ordered into lists.

                               Lists can be formed into tables, tables grow into branching trees.

                         Sometimes it will be very hard to read the tables through the trees. "Math Joke"  Groupings of different varieties have a different shape. Learn to group and list your data. If you want to get to the point of forgetting all this stuff you will want to group your data. For instance, the differences in the relative lengths of the index to ring fingers shows a difference like boy or girl. Boys on one side of the room and girls on the other. Sounds like junior high school prom. When we get to systems analysis, this little "Eye Training" trick will pay off.

                          As much as I feel it is my responsibility to explain the elements of comparison in say a palm reading, I will need time to give you the quality of interpretive resources I myself would like to have, the books are all we have. And although my unique perspectives give you extra skills for turning the limited information into a clearer map, I'm still calling the fingers by their planets. Ideally I'ld rather be focusing on the resources you can get from me, exclusively. Thank you for paying attention, In the long run this will put you way ahead of the learning curve. You have the advantage.

                          We are going to step back for a second to focus more on the fingers, namely the prints. Sometimes called the fine line patterns, these are also found and read on the "Planetary Mounds" of the hands and feet, (Dermatoglyphics.) These "papillary," markings are genetic and do not change with time the way that the deep lines sometimes can. On each finger tip and most mounds, of the Hands, Toes and Feet, there are:

                                       Loops;
                                                   Radial / from the percussion side of the hand
                                                   Diurnal / from the thumb side of the hand
                                                                  {only one delta / three way point of divergence in the fine line markings (bottom of the finger pad above the joint}

                                       Whorls {having two deltas [above the last finger joint]}

                                       Arches {no deltas / lines go directly across the finger}

                           The interpretations for each type of marking on each finger / mound is dependent on which finger / mound the marking occurs and how we model data for that corresponding planetary sphere of influence.

                           Sometimes an arch can be flat looking like a delta. (Delta, The convergence of papillary lines going in three different directions.) And although the delta or arch is found low on the finger tip, the difference is distinct. A whorl looks like a whirlpool if it is spiral, or like an eye if the lines are concentric around a point on the finger tip or mound. Whorls can have loops inside, usually just one but rarely two loops inside a whorl can be like a (yin /yang) double loop. You may also see a yin /yang double loop that does connect with fine lines that go to the edges of the fingers on both sides. An example of a very unusual genetic and statistical anomaly, is a person born with all whorls on each of all ten of their fingers, happens only once in a half a million people. People with whorls are the least common to begin with. This is one of those little details that can demand a lot of study. Finger prints and the prints on the hand and feet will tell you about genetic predisposition. {I'm Trying to learn the tensor algebra notation for the contour line mappings analogous to the fine line finger print.}

                           As you are starting to notice, there is the probability of getting lost before you even get out your magnifying glasses. Again the interpretations of these differences can be thought of as a multi variate statistic. Recognizing the groupings of the distributions is often more important than thinking that you are always going to have the interpretation for each and every kind of hand or finger marking. This is where doing your own research is going to make all the difference in the world. Being informed about what you are looking for is much more impressive than thinking that you always are going to be right about an interpretation.

                          I'm going to keep coming back and filling in more details on each subject.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Is there anybody out there?