If we want to look at truth, at the power of predictable truth, that transformative inevitability of truth: We need only to look at those "Truths" which have split the popular opinion biases in favor of good sense. Examples:
1.) Non Violence,
2.) Human Rights,
3.) Globalism,
4.) Secular Humanism,
5.) and now "Complementarity."
If we look at the strengths and weaknesses of each of these social revolutions, we realize these conflicts to varying degrees are long term, ongoing and seemingly unresolvable. But we have also witnessed the undeniable force of change expressed through the inevitably transformative tidal power of information. The gravity of these foreshadowed "enlightenments" have generated predictable waves of truth's swells, signaling the onslaught of these unstoppable awarenesses that inform and construct the outcome of events, regardless of the power vacuums and fear mongering that feed off of decaying cultures in denial.
Usually when we are attacked for our radical or revolutionary liberalities, it is usually done through a process of Branding. The enemy of my enemy is a friend with a recognizable brand label. Woe. We humans can be exploitably dumb. My one time secretary says that, "Historically oppressed peoples can make for predictably gullible followers."
If, "It is the privilege of wisdom to listen," then I say, it is the wisdom of privilege that makes me need to speak out, because I know most people don't know what freedom is. Freedom to think. Freedom to speak. Freedom to make choices for one's self without permission from others. To be able to decide for one's self what it is that each person will do.
The concept of free speech and what it is to be qualified for protection under the law is still viewed as matter of citizenship, and therefore is still a matter of state. This is Branding in it's largest political dimension. Meta Branding is the titled name for each of the forces for constructive change. (See table above.) Brand name states are always co-opting for these idealized associated powers of the Meta Brands, through programs of "Stated" objectives whether a political machine is ever able to deliver on the promised "Stated" objectives or not. As a matter of course, peoples gullibility makes the political (Macro Economic) world go round.
Answer; Meta Branding that can't be mis identified. Of the five Meta brands I have sighted above in the table, "Human Rights" seems to be the only one that doesn't stink of extreme liberal politics (Yes, I am a liberal.) And yet in the final analysis, All of the liberal Meta Brands are very anti-branding, (Case in point; "There are no violent militant pacifists.) Creative mediums, as I see it, are nothing more than models for intelligent prediction. Try to prove me wrong. My Meta Brand of "Complementarity" can't be re-branded. But businesses will try, just watch. This is the world I see.
