Mirroring and feedback are two ways we give and receive directions from each other. We can also cue each other non verbally by expressions, gestures and by the changing the subject. Conversation is the most active region of mutually changing explorations into our shared co boundaries and differences. Psychics get an understandable bad rap for "Cold reading," (and for doing it very badly if I must say.) I personally like a certain amount of "Blind Study" that comes from doing a reading correctly. A deadpan response may not tell me when I'm right about somebody, but at least I don't have to tell people about things that are none of my business. As a process of "Mutual Boundary Exploration," I try to discourage repeat business. It always gets way too personal and I loose any "Blind" credibility I might have had when I didn't know that person.
The point of departure in a conversation, (just like with a good reading) starts with a question, issue or interest. Mutual language, interests and beliefs or experiences all form the platform from which the mutual exploration is directed. Most people have little or no experience with the use of statistical analysis as a scientific basis for an inductively intuitive diagnostic. As a result I could be just as phony and untrustworthy as any other psychic who is really just a clumsy "Cold Reader." (Most so called "Psychics" are definitely not even slightly psychic.) I prefer to say I'm a "Professional Psychic." Because whether there is such a real thing or not, I'm willing to play the game, and I'm very good at it. I love my work and I love the people I'm able to serve.
The irony of course is that we are all "Reading" each other all the time anyways, whether we know it or not. The most "Psychic" person I know is my training partner and of course he doesn't even believe in psychics at all. He's one of the only people I know who doesn't piss me off. He's that sensitive in an intelligent practical sensible sort of way. Our interests are as very different as are our distinctive personalities. He knows, interpersonally, I let him drive. His pacing and conversational tempo is fine with me although I can get really quite lost in the clouds. He's got his feet on the ground and we bring our own unique divergent perspectives. Plus he also has a background in statistics and resultantly we have very fertile rewarding discussions, point counter point on the issues I explore in my blog.
Acting as a very polished parabolic mirror means I not only risk burning people with the focus of my critical sensitivities, but I'm also hated for knowing things that aren't my problem. Co vectors and Co Boundaries are just math terms to define relationships between objects and movement. If I want to explain what I'm doing, I first consider who I'm speaking to. You are someone who has control over the direction and the boundaries of our contact. That's the only way it should be. Very rarely do I ever defy anyone. Denials are for amateurs. I do have the right of refusal, and generally I don't let people know my business casually. I know that sounds weak, but If you really were psychic you would know why I choose to be sensitive to the directions that other people take.
