Barriers of Symbolic Language

                            
                  The term Symbolic Language is a math term for precise symbols and methods of things like Calculus and Tensor Analysis. Most people have an aversion to languages that are difficult. 
                                        Coding Density = Foreign Language  
                  
                   I've been beating up on my fellow psychics and to be fair, I'm turning against belligerent science. When it comes to matters of faith, people work hard at building walls. (Science takes faith.) I'm building a bridge between the supposedly antagonistic contenders for the attentions of the faithful. Pro and Con. Latin Mass or Physics Lecture, it doesn't matter. Language is used to communicate and/or alienate.

                    I love Math just like I love Jesus, Buddha and whoever else has lived to free the world of ignorance and illiteracy. But both are abused and taken for granted.  People who worship the slide ruler are often as sadistic as, well...,  I think I need to get specific.

                    When I first started getting my sanity back, I again started using a simple drafters compass to divide the arcs of the circle, (Meta Formally Logical Induction by Ancient Time Keeping Metrics). It turns out to be much much easier to use a compass and a straight edge than it is to try to do the same Geometry with a Graphics Calculator Software.

         Similarly it has been the case with using small varied round clear stones to prove "Preverbal Ordering Principles":
       
         Each stone is different, just like people; (Size, Shape, Color, Clarity, etc.)
       
         Each stone is a discreet entity, just like people; (One Stone, One Person.)
       
         It's much easier to visually remember each stone without symbolic language than by naming each stone.  Like people, if you can't remember what someone looks like, the name doesn't matter. Names are important but the memory is for much much more.
       
         Counting each sampling specimen forms comparative groups,  just like people.  As humans we have been imposing Symmetrical ways of Collating groups for as long as we can remember. This Symmetrical Coalescence and Meta Formal Logic,  is at the core of all Ancient Spiritual Technologies.  [Father/Mother,  Brother/Sister]/{Day/Night, Morning/Evening}/[1./2., 3./4.]

                     Our animal brains are much too developed to be limited to linguistics alone. It's just to slow.  That's not to diminish this most precious shared resource of symbolic language, and language should not be dumped. To the contrary I want Math to be that universal language, but that's asking a lot. The need for intuitive simplicity will always demand that creative thought experiments takes precedence over the much more difficult hard technologies. Then we can get on to the hardware. I'm fortunate to have had a lifetime to study. When it comes to defining differences between stones, people, concepts or even just variabilities in general, in between said objects and/or subjects, categories of comparison emerge. Language is our shared naming and ordering of categorized objects and subjects, symbolically.

                     Point being now days the term Intuitive is an equally vague and commercial new age marketing gimmick. Symbolic Meta Speak is also done by sales representatives of computers.  The language of both Meta Physically and Materialistically Opposed World Views are both pandering and spiritually exploitative. Belligerent Science and Materialism is just a new way of manipulating peoples beliefs. I'm hoping that with my own overwhelmingly neutral opinion bias, that if I must offend, I will have offended everyone equally without alienating anyone.           Good luck.