What a lot of us can feel can often be expressed as "Emotional Language." I'm just a very good medium.
Just like almost everything else, languages have polarities.
Dynamics of assertions and denials, propositions and disproof. There are also dynamics to persuasion. Appeals and Refusals, Approach and Deference. Interrogation and Accusation. We all want to know, how and when to act, and why. Influence is a very strange phenomena of human behavior. The intent can express dominance and recessiveness, (See, SOCIAL RECURSION.) The language of influence is not easy. (As a "Sensitive" I've been given a whole extra arsenal of resources.) Getting people to want to cooperate can be very positive, but you do have to worry about the worthiness of all the cooperating parties. We hope that we can see the utility of good, fair commitments. But once you have to look at the place of a situational ethic, "We soon recognize the possible inevitability of corruption and bad faith."
The moral question probably does come down to a pursuit of personal power and knowledge, freedom and responsibility. These are very real normal constraints. Our innate religiousity is incredibly rational and practical. People don't need excuses to want to have good faith. Most people can appreciate the value of a viable social contract. A moral good. NO ONE WANTS TO BE THE TARGET OF "BAD FAITH." But we are still looking for some understanding, some knowledge or language with which to feel secure, that everything has a meaning. It's usually my atheist friends that come up with the best explanations of God, and a few actually don't judge me for my commitment to being a psychic. In a religion of awe, "We need not forgo having faith." Physicists are said to be many of the most innately religious people. Because atheist or not, we spend an inordinate amount of time contemplating the possible existence of God.
A "Complementarity" thus involves a "Middle Path" if you like, a path of "Mildness." Somewhere between antagonists. Society not only produces works of "Coalescent Symmetries," but society also, functions as a continuous collective. Maybe good and so called evil are not the cause of everything that happens, but a sense of moral direction is something we are all supposed to be able to understand. Even if it is only for the sake of important dramatic resolution, closure. This is particularly important for anyone who claims to be a psychic. People can be deceitful. People have attitude. Calling my self a psychic is almost an invitation to be asked to leave and not come back. Let's be honest. I said it before, "I'm not supposed to be trusted." I'm an actual psychic, whatever that means to you. But "I" do trust you. And I'm definitely going to want to trust in your ability to find a reasonable and rational "Complementarity" for your self. Lets' see where this goes now from here.
