Beings as I have already basically documented the core principles and motivations of my research, I want to explain the choices that inform my procedures. My work is essentially the linking of the ancient use of what I have called "Meta Formal Logic," through a linguistic of "Perceptual Ordination" to our so called modern "Science." Although, as I have demonstrated, these analysis of phenomena in the world are a totality, and is in fact, just different ways of studying the same things. I would suggest that the reason meta physics is so tainted with the pretense of superstition is because of our modern societies short historical memory. The most important informing drive behind these developing stages of evolving meta science is aesthetics. When early man started ordering sequences of comparisons, these initial structures were the result of latent "Intelligences." Primary languages are the inevitable outgrowth of perceptual ordinations with simple polarities and symmetry. One of the most stubborn but purely unconscious revulsions that modern man has toward the meta sciences is this ancient over structuring Symmetrical Coalescence.
There is no explaining how the Perceptual Ordinations of; the Symmetrical Astrological Mandala, The symmetrical I Ching, the Symmetrical Tarot, the Symmetrical Chinese Meridians, etc, formed unplanned out of an otherwise non sequential unorganized coalescence. In other words, in order for any of these shared cultural properties to exist, there had to be "Latent Intelligences." Rational Positivists hate "The Which Came First, The Chicken or the Egg paradoxes," because there is no rational causation, the motivations are aesthetic and the decisions to make these choices were in non causal agreement. The choices were made independently and mutually correct with no planning other than the free will to find the truth. Just like science. No straight lines to these proofs. There was no "Intelligent Design" to these fortunate accidents of accuracy. Providence is the closest thing we have to the proof of the existence of a "God" per say. And in many cases of our shared history, ancient science saw the truth and it was censored. Unplanned accidents prevented the acceptance of knowledge until centuries much later. By the limitations of our so called modern logic the subject of intuition is now thought of as ignorance. This is in total denial of the creative, spontaneous, non linear and purely inductive methodologies that produced the magnificent sciences we now enjoy. Which if left to the belligerent denials of presumptuously arrogant men, we would never be allowed look for the "Real Truth" in the first place.
